Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse

This study aims to determine the rate of recurrence of central pelvic organ prolapse in patients who have undergone surgery (sacropexy with and without mesh) for the same pathology.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

There is a lack of data in the literature comparing sacroplexing with the use of mesh with sacroplexing performed without the use of mesh in terms of recurrence, improvement in symptoms, and restoration of normal pelvic organ prolapse relationships. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of recurrence of central pelvic organ prolapse in patients with a clinical diagnosis of genital prolapse stage ≥ 2 according to the POP-Q classification who underwent laparoscopic sacroplasty with mesh (group 1) and without mesh (group 2). The study may provide information on the impact of mesh in laparoscopic surgery for the correction of central pelvic organ prolapse.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
        • Contact:
      • Verona, Italy, 37126
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with genital prolapse stage ≥ 2 according to the POP-Q classification undergoing laparoscopic sacroplexxy with mesh and laparoscopic sacropexy without mesh

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of genital prolapse stage ≥ 2 according to POP-Q classification
  • Surgical treatment of laparoscopic sacropexy by mesh (group 1) and without (group 2) in female patients
  • Acquisition of informed consent
  • At least one follow-up evaluation at 24 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 80 years
  • Previous genital prolapse surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate of central pelvic organ prolapse
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
The rate of recurrence of central pelvic organ prolapse in patients with a clinical diagnosis of genital prolapse stage ≥ 2 according to the POP-Q classification, undergoing sacroplasty with and without mesh
24 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate of central pelvic organ prolapse in laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy, sacralcervicopexy and sacralcolpopexy
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
The rate of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence in patients treated with mesh (group 1) and without (group 2) in the laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy, sacralcervicopexy and sacralcolpopexy
24 months after surgery
Rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: During surgery and within 30 days
Evaluation of intraoperative and postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
During surgery and within 30 days
Modification of symptoms after surgery
Time Frame: Before surgery and 24 months after surgery
Change in pre- and post-operative symptomatology assessed through the completion of a questionnaire
Before surgery and 24 months after surgery
Changes in the disease framework
Time Frame: Before surgery and 24 months after surgery
Change in the disease framework of pelvic organ prolapse according to the POP-Q classification assessed before and after surgery
Before surgery and 24 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diego Raimondo, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Female Genital Prolapse

Subscribe