A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake (BCS)

December 3, 2024 updated by: Thomas Yuen Tung Lam, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Mobile Messenger-initiated, Theory-based, Culturally Tailored, and Fully Automated Chatbot to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake

Breast cancer (BC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide. In Hong Kong (HK), BC is the most common cancer, ranking third in cancer deaths among females. International guidelines advocate regular mammographic screening for women aged 40-50 to 69-74, reducing BC mortality by 20%.

The success and effectiveness of an organized cancer screening program are largely dependent on high adherence or uptake rates. However, nonadherence to BC screening is common and the suboptimal uptake rate remains a challenge, particularly in Asian countries.

Conventional interventions are effective in increasing mammographic screening uptake but are time-consuming, labor-dependent, and expensive. Mobile messenger chatbots are a potential cost-saving tool for enhancing BC screening uptake because they involve only a one-off development cost and a small maintenance cost . Currently, most studies evaluating the effectiveness of mobile health interventions in improving mammography screening uptake have been conducted in Western populations . Health-seeking behaviors for cancer screening in the Chinese population differ from those of Caucasians because of differences in culture, health beliefs, and education, especially regarding breast-related diseases. Chinese women often feel embarrassed when talking with healthcare workers in person about breast health. Communicating with a fully automated chatbot can minimize embarrassment. Additionally, linguistically and culturally tailored interventions are effective in increasing cancer screening rates in the Chinese population.

However, studies evaluating combined theory-based mHealth interventions to enhance BC screening uptake are scarce. Two theory-based WhatsApp chatbots were developed to promote CRC screening, and the longitudinal repeat fecal immunochemical test (FIT) adherence rate of a population-based CRC screening program in HK. These two chatbots used in investigator's previous studies had designs similar to that of the proposed chatbot, except for the health education materials. The chatbot design can be adopted directly with minor modifications to the workflow, replacement of content from CRC screening-related to BC screening-related, and culturally modified education materials. Consequently, the investigators can develop a new chatbot for this study at a lower cost and in a shorter time.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the past two decades, internet and mobile phone usage has increased due to affordability. The COVID-19 pandemic has further necessitated online and phone-based healthcare, paving the way for less labor-intensive, cost-effective mHealth interventions. These include short message service (SMS) text messages, telephone calls, email, social media, and mobile apps, which have significantly boosted BC screening uptake by 1.2%-50.9%. Among them, manual calls and SMS are prevalent methods. Manual calls facilitate interactions with subjects, aiding informed decision-making and participation but require high manpower. Although SMS offers automatic communication and chatbot features, each message costs approximately HKD$0.2, posing long-term economic challenges, especially for population-based interventions. Conversely, chatbots based on mobile messengers, like WhatsApp are less expensive due to unlimited free text and multimedia messaging across different mHealth operating systems. WhatsApp is globally prevalent, including in HK and has been successfully implemented in various clinical settings. Given these promising results, the investigators believe that mobile messenger-initiated chatbots have an extended role in the BC screening uptake rate because of the ubiquity, acceptability, and effectiveness of mHealth interventions. However, studies evaluating combined theory-based mHealth interventions to enhance BC screening uptake are scarce.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

470

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. asymptomatic Chinese Women
  2. 44-69 years old
  3. eligible to enroll in a government-subsidized risk-stratified BC screening program
  4. ability to read Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. moderate- or high-risk women as defined by the local risk-stratified BC screening program
  2. inability to provide informed consent
  3. incomplete conversation with the chatbot.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WCI
The WCI group will receive automated messages based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), including personalized risk assessments, educational videos featuring medical professionals and relatable scenarios, and tailored prompts to encourage mammographic screening.
The WCI group will receive automated messages based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), including personalized risk assessments, educational videos featuring medical professionals and relatable scenarios, and tailored prompts to encourage mammographic screening.
No Intervention: STR
A standard tet reminder will be sent regarding the breast cancer screening program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BCS uptake rate
Time Frame: Within three months after the intervention
The primary outcome is the BC screening uptake rate, defined as participation in and completion of mammographic screening within three months after the intervention.
Within three months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BCS uptake rate
Time Frame: Six months after the intervention
BC screening uptake rate within six months after the intervention
Six months after the intervention
Risk factors related to BCS non-adherence by interview
Time Frame: Six months after the intervention
Risk factors associated with breast cancer screening non-adherence will be collected by focused group discussion
Six months after the intervention
Mammography results
Time Frame: Six months after the intervention
Number of positive mammography results of subjects who completed mammography
Six months after the intervention
Mammograph breast biopsy rate
Time Frame: Six months after the intervention
Uptake rate of subsequent breast biopsy for those with positive mammographic results
Six months after the intervention
Detection rate of breast cancer
Time Frame: Six months after the intervention
Detection rate of breast cancer
Six months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Still being decided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Risk

Subscribe