"Living an Active Life with Osteoporosis" - a Digital Patient Education Program on Osteoporosis. a Feasibility/pilot Study As Part of the PATOS Project (Patient Education in Osteoporosis). (PilotPATOS)

February 4, 2025 updated by: Anna Spangeus, University Hospital, Linkoeping

In this feasibility and pilot study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a digital patient education program for individuals with osteoporosis. The study involves a 5-week intervention period during which participants will have access to the digital education program. Patients will be assessed both before and after the intervention.

The digital patient education program comprises eight modules covering essential topics related to osteoporosis self-care. The program includes both psychoeducation and support for behavioral changes. Patients will progress through the program at their own pace.

The name of the digital patient education program is: program is: "Att leva ett aktivt liv med benskörhet" (translated to english "Living an Active Life with Osteoporosis")

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Östergötland
      • Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden, 58183
        • Linkoping University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoporosis diagnosis with or without a previous low-energy fracture
  • Age > 50 years
  • Women and men
  • Basic computer skills

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with difficulty understanding the Swedish language to the extent that they cannot comprehend the content of the patient education program.
  • Cognitive impairment/dementia where the patient is not deemed to understand the implications of study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital patient education program
Digital patient education program for 5 weeks
The education consists of 8 modules including main themes within osteoporosis, with content aiming to promote behavioural changes including psychoeducation and behavioural activation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - generic
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed with RAND-36 (Research and Development questionnaire). The RAND-36 compromises 36 items with two to six response options according to an ordinal scale. Eight health domains are assessed, coded, scored and summarised to derive the domains. The scores are transformed into a 0-100 scale. Zero indicates the worst possible HRQoL and 100 the best.
6 weeks
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - generic
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed with EQ-5D-5L. The EQ5D covers 5 dimensionsand. In addition to these dimensions, the EQ-5D includes a visual analogue scale (VAS) where respondents rate their overall health on a scale.
6 weeks
Self-Care in osteoporosis
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed with 26 questions in 5 domains (medication, diet, physical training, fall risk, ergonomy). Questions covering knowledge, motivation, opportunities and behaviour.
6 weeks
Patient enablement instrument (PEI)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The patient enablement instrument (PEI) is used to measure the patient's perceived change in ability to understand and cope with his or her health issues after the treatment period and contains six items. The text "As a result of the participating in the Osteoporosis School, do you feel that you are …" is followed by six items; 1) able to cope with life, 2) able to understand your illness, 3) able to cope with your illness, 4) able to keep yourself healthy, 5) confident about your health, and 6) able to help yourself. The following five alternative answers were used for each statement; much better/much more, better/more, same, less/worse and not applicable. The PEI point for much better/much more is 2; for better/more is 1; and for same, less/worse or not applicable is 0. These points are added and thus the total PEI score ranges between 0 (worst score) and 12 (best score).
6 weeks
Fear of falling
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed with Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). The FES-I is a 16-item questionnaire used to measure the level of concern about falling during social and physical activities inside and outside the home. Each item I scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (1 = not concerned, and 4= very concerned). The item scores are summed up to a total score ranging from minimum 16 to maximum 64 with higher the score higher being the concern for falling.
6 weeks
Fear avoidance beliefs regarding physical activity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire physical activity subscale (FABQ_FA) include 4 questions about physical activity. Agreement with each statement is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale (0= completely disagree, to 6= completely agree), and a total score is calculated (maximum of 24) with higher scores indicates stronger fear avoidance beliefs.
6 weeks
Illness perception
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed with the Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire BIPQ which is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses cognitive and emotional representation of illness. Each item is rated on a 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating a more threatening perception of the illness. The total score is calculated by summing the scores and range between 0-80 with higher scores indicate worse illness perception.
6 weeks
Self-reported physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The questionnaire (Hälsobladet) is used in clinical routine in Sweden to assess self-reported lifestyle habits on a weekly basis
6 weeks
Self-reported pain and intake of pain medication
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self-reported pain was assessed both regarding intensity (NRS 0-10) and frequency as well as medication intake.
6 weeks
Self-reported fall and balance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self-reported fall during the last year as well as perceived balance was assessed (NRS 0-10)
6 weeks
Maximal walking speed
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Walking speed was assessed with patients walking 10 meters at a maximal walking speed.
6 weeks
Hand-strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed in sitting position with the Jamar both right and left side.
6 weeks
Chair Sit to stand (30 sec)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The maximal number of sit to stand during 30 seconds.
6 weeks
Measure of hyperkyfosis
Time Frame: 6 weeks
With patients in upright standing distance between C7 and wall, as well as between tragus of the ear to wall was evaluated.
6 weeks
Timed-loading standing test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Ability to stand up with weights (1-0.5 kg) in both arms during a maximum of 2 minutes
6 weeks
One-leg standing with eyes opened
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed for both right and left legs and a maximum of 60 seconds
6 weeks
One-leg standing with eyes closed
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Assessed for both right and left legs and a maximum of 60 seconds.
6 weeks
Walking on a line
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patients were asked to take a maximum of 15 steps forward on a line and then a maximum of 15 steps backwards on a line.
6 weeks
Timed-up and go (TUG)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patients were asked to stand up from sitting and walt 3 meters, turning around, walk back and sit again. Time was measured in seconds.
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity Pattern
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Activity pattern will be measured with activPAL™ in a subset of patients (n=10). The activPAL™ will be used recording physical activities during 7 days (including time spent lying, sitting, standing and stepping).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Digital patient education program

Subscribe