Assessment of Remote Approaches for Identification of Autonomic Dysfunction Among Survivors of Leukemia and Lymphoma

April 22, 2026 updated by: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

This study seeks to determine if diagnosing cardiac autonomic dysfunction (AD) can be done remotely with the same accuracy as in-person testing. If so, the identification of AD could happen sooner, facilitating remote studies of the condition and potentially reducing the risk of illness. Childhood cancer survivors, particularly survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Hodgkins's lymphoma (HL), appear to be at increased risk for AD.

Primary Objectives:

  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of heart rate variability (HRV), measured remotely with biosensor technology (Actigraph LEAP), compared to in-person assessment using the Ewing battery as the reference standard to identify cardiac autonomic dysfunction (AD) among survivors of leukemia and lymphoma.
  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31 (COMPASS31) compared to the Ewing battery to identify AD among leukemia and lymphoma survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each participant will complete an in-person standardized clinical assessment for AD, called the Ewing battery. during the participants' Human Performance Lab during their SJLIFE functional exam. It is estimated it will take 60-90-minutes to complete the Ewing battery. The tests include monitoring heart rate variations during deep breathing and lying down to standing, as well as monitoring blood pressure variations when standing and maintaining hand grip. Participants will be asked to not consume aspirin, ibuprofen or acetaminophen 24-hours before the assessment. Additionally, participants will be asked to avoid alcohol or caffeine within 6-hours, and smoking 3-hours, before testing.

After the in-person assessment, each participant will be given a wrist biosensor to remotely monitor heart rate variability for 7 days after they return home. Participants will also complete an AD symptom questionnaire, COMPASS31. The AD symptom questionnaire will be completed either before or after the in-person assessment. This questionnaire will take about 20-30 minutes to complete.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

188

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • Recruiting
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kirsten K Ness, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Study Population

Survivors from the SJLIFE cohort previously treated for ALL, HL, and Non-HL diagnostic groups

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants enrolled in St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) >18 years of age.
  • Primary diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL), or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Non-HL).
  • Not currently taking beta-blocker medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who cannot speak, read, and/or understand English.
  • Individuals who are unable to follow directions/instructions in order to complete the Ewing battery.
  • Individuals with acute heart failure (new or worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure, including a combination of the following: dyspnea, orthopnea, lower limb swelling, elevated jugular venous pressure, and pulmonary congestion).
  • Women who are currently pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Screening (COMPASS31 + battery assessment + heart monitor)
Patients complete the COMPASS31 questionnaire and undergo an in-person Ewing battery assessment over 60-90 minutes on study. Patients then wear a biosensensor heart monitor for 7 days to monitor heart rate variability remotely on study.
Undergo in-person Ewing battery assessment
Receive COMPASS31 questionnaire
Wear biosensensor heart monitor that remotely collects heart rate variability.
Experimental: Screening (battery assessment + COMPASS31 + heart monitor)
Patients undergo an in-person Ewing battery assessment over 60-90 minutes and complete the COMPASS31 questionnaire on study. Patients then wear a biosensensor heart monitor for 7 days to monitor heart rate variability remotely on study.
Undergo in-person Ewing battery assessment
Receive COMPASS31 questionnaire
Wear biosensensor heart monitor that remotely collects heart rate variability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability (msec)
Time Frame: Up to 7 days after the on-campus study visit
The standard deviation of normal-to-normal heartbeat intervals over a 24-hour period measured in milliseconds
Up to 7 days after the on-campus study visit
Abbreviated Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (0-100)
Time Frame: During the on-campus study visit (Day 1)

Symptom burden-based questionnaire of six weighted domains (orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal bladder and pupillomotor)

Abbreviated Composite Autonomic Symptom Score:

  • This questionnaire, administered during Day 1, generates a weighted score from 0 to 100, and questions fall into one of six domains: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor function. Scores are determined by applying a simplified scoring algorithm.
  • Overall score interpretation:

    • < 3 or less: Mild
    • 3-7: Moderate
    • >7: Severe
During the on-campus study visit (Day 1)
Ewing Score (0-5)
Time Frame: During the on-campus study visit (Day 1)

Derived from sum of five individual autonomic test scores

Ewing Battery Scoring:

  • This battery is administered during Day 1. Each test within the battery (5 tests total) is assigned a score of 0 (normal), 0.5 (borderline), or 1 (abnormal).
  • Overall score interpretation:

    • 0-1: Considered normal autonomic function
    • 1.5-2: Mild autonomic dysfunction
    • 2.5-3: Moderate autonomic dysfunction
    • 3.5-5: Severe autonomic dysfunction
During the on-campus study visit (Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kirsten K Ness, PhD, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant de-identified datasets containing the variables analyzed in the published article will be made available (related to the study primary or secondary objectives contained in the publication). Supporting documents such as the protocol, statistical analyses plan, and informed consent are available through the ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) website for the specific study. Data used to generate the published article will be made available at the time of article publication. Investigators who seek access to individual level de-identified data will contact the computing team in the Department of Biostatistics (ClinTrialDataRequest@stjude.org) who will respond to the data request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available at the time of article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be provided to researchers following a formal request with the following information: full name of requestor, affiliation, data set requested, and timing of when data is needed. As an informational point, the lead statistician and study principal investigator will be informed that primary results datasets have been requested.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Childhood Cancer

Clinical Trials on Exercise Intervention - Ewing Battery Assessment

Subscribe