Sport-Related Concussion Recovery in Athletes

March 3, 2025 updated by: Hyung Rock Lee, University of Central Arkansas

Enhancing Concussion Assessment: a Multimodal Approach Using Neurocognitive Testing, Balance Evaluation, and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy

The goal of this study is to enhance the accuracy and sensitivity of concussion evaluation by integrating traditional assessment tools with emerging neuroimaging technologies, such as Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). By systematically collecting data across multiple assessment domains-including sideline evaluations, neurocognitive testing, balance assessments, vestibular/ocular-motor screening (VOMS), and brain activity measurements-this study aims to improve the diagnostic process and ensure a safer return-to-play protocol for athletes recovering from sport-related concussions.

Research Questions:

  1. How do traditional concussion assessment tools (SCAT, computerized neurocognitive tests, balance tests, and VOMS) compare to fNIRS in detecting changes in brain function following a sport-related concussion?
  2. What is the relationship between pre-injury baseline measures, acute post- injury assessments, and recovery-phase evaluations in athletes diagnosed with a sport-related concussion?
  3. Can fNIRS improve the sensitivity and specificity of concussion diagnosis compared to existing clinical assessments?
  4. How do clinical symptoms, medical history, and other individual factors influence concussion recovery and return-to-play timelines?
  5. Does integrating fNIRS with traditional assessment tools enhance the ability to track recovery progression and inform return-to-play decisions?

This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of concussion diagnosis and recovery while assessing the added value of fNIRS technology in improving clinical decision-making.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

  1. Study Description This study aims to enhance the accuracy of concussion evaluation and improve return-to-play decisions for athletes recovering from sport-related concussions. By incorporating both traditional assessment tools and advanced neuroimaging technology, such as Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), this research seeks to refine how concussions are diagnosed and monitored.
  2. Who is Participating?

    College athletes will be recruited as part of their routine concussion baseline testing. Participants will include:

    • Athletes diagnosed with a sport-related concussion by healthcare providers.
    • Matched control athletes who have not sustained a concussion, assessed on the same schedule as concussed athletes.
    • Contact and non-contact sport athletes who have not experienced head injuries, tested before and after the season.
  3. How is the Study Conducted?

    Testing occurs at four key time points:

    • Pre-Season (Baseline): Athletes complete a series of tests to establish their normal cognitive and physical function before any injuries occur.
    • Post-Injury (Within 72 Hours and Asymptomatic): If an athlete sustains a concussion, they undergo assessments shortly after the injury to measure its immediate effects.
    • Return-to-Play: Once the athlete has completed the necessary recovery steps and is cleared to return to play, they are reassessed to evaluate their recovery progress.
    • Re-Baseline (Six Months Post-Injury): Concussed athletes undergo follow- up testing at least six months after the injury to assess long-term recovery and determine whether any persistent neurophysiological changes remain.
  4. What is Being Measured?

    This study utilizes a comprehensive concussion evaluation approach that includes:

    • Sideline assessments (e.g., Sports Concussion Assessment Tool [SCAT])
    • Computerized neurocognitive testing (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing)
    • Objective balance tests (NeuroCom VSR Sport)
    • Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening (VOMS)
    • Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure brain activity non-invasively
    • Clinical symptom tracking and medical history review
  5. Why is This Study Important? The data collected will contribute to a robust database aimed at improving concussion assessment methods. By integrating fNIRS with standard concussion tests, this research seeks to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve the ability to track recovery, and ensure a safer return to play for athletes. Additionally, the inclusion of a re-baseline assessment at six months post-injury will provide valuable insight into the long-term effects of concussion, informing future guidelines for concussion management. Ultimately, these findings could lead to more reliable tools for healthcare providers managing sport-related concussions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Conway, Arkansas, United States, 72034
        • University of Central Arkansas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited through university-affiliated sports medicine providers. When a student-athlete, including intramural sports participants, exhibits any signs, symptoms, or behaviors consistent with a sport-related concussion, they will be removed from practice or competition by either a member of the coaching staff or the sports medicine staff.

Upon confirmation of a concussion diagnosis by the medical staff, the concussed athlete will be selected as a study participant and will be required to follow the post-concussion protocol outlined by the participating institution, which adheres to NCAA standards.

Whenever possible, control subjects will be recruited from the same team, other sports teams, and/or students at the participating university who meet the inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be recruited from athletes who have sustained a concussion and/or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), as determined by a physical examination conducted by medical staff based on the established concussion definition: biomechnical forces, typically resulting from a direct blow to the head, face, neck, or elsewhere on the body with an impulsive force transmitted to the head.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of a psychiatric illness, attention deficit disorder, or learning disability.
  • Current use of psychoactive medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Concussed and Matched control Pool

The concussed group consists of collegiate athletes who have been diagnosed with a sport-related concussion by healthcare providers and meet the specified inclusion criteria. Injured participants will undergo testing within 72 hours of the injury and at predetermined time points post-concussion. Matched control participants will be assessed at the same time intervals as their injured counterparts to ensure comparability.

The concussion test battery will comprise five assessments designed to evaluate sport-related concussion: 1. Health Questionnaire, 2. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT), 3. Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) 4. Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), 5. Balance Assessment.

Additionally, the NIRSIT scanner will be utilized at each testing session to assess cognitive function and brain activity through Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).

The conclusion test battery will comprise five assessment designed to evaluate sport-related concussion:

  1. Health Questionnaire - Including as assessment of signs and symptoms.
  2. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT)
  3. Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS)
  4. Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT)
  5. Postural stability assessment (NeuroCom VSR Sport).

Functional Neuroimaging Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive neuroimaging technology that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood oxygenation. The NIRSIT scanner will be employed at each testing session to assess cognitive function using the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and postural stability using the NeuroCom VSR Sport system.

Pre-season and Post-Season Subject Pool
Participants will complete baseline concussion testing upon initiation into their intercollegiate athletic program. This group will consist of uninjured collegiate athletes from both contact and non-contact sports. Testing will be conducted at two time points: pre-season and post-season.

The conclusion test battery will comprise five assessment designed to evaluate sport-related concussion:

  1. Health Questionnaire - Including as assessment of signs and symptoms.
  2. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT)
  3. Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS)
  4. Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT)
  5. Postural stability assessment (NeuroCom VSR Sport).

Functional Neuroimaging Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive neuroimaging technology that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood oxygenation. The NIRSIT scanner will be employed at each testing session to assess cognitive function using the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and postural stability using the NeuroCom VSR Sport system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prefrontal Cortex Activation during Neurocognitive Test using Functional Near- Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Division-I Athletes following Sports-Related Concussion
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after becoming asymptomatic.
To compare prefrontal hemodynamic activation using fNIRS during the performance of a computerized ImPACT in a sample of concussed Division-I athletes tested within 72 hours post-injury compared to age-matched healthy subjects.
From enrollment to 1 year after becoming asymptomatic.
Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Postural Stability Testing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Division-I Athletes Following Sport-Related Concussion
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
The purpose of this study is to examine prefrontal cortex activation during postural stability testing in Division-I athletes following a sport-related concussion using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
From enrollment to 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
Evaluating the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Multifaceted Concussion Assessment Battery: A Comparison with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Outcomes
Time Frame: From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enhancing Concussion Assessment Battery: Evaluating the Validity of Reliable Change Indices (RCI) in Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) using Machine Learning Approaches.
Time Frame: From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
Computerized neurocognitive tests like Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) are becoming more widely used by sports medicine professionals to evaluate concussions. A baseline ImPACT test is often recommended to help compare post-injury results, providing a more accurate picture of an athlete's cognitive function after a concussion. One method ImPACT uses to assess changes in cognitive function is the Reliable Change Index (RCI), which helps determine whether a difference in scores is meaningful. However, RCI has limitations, such as being less sensitive to real cognitive changes and the potential for misinterpretation. This study explores how machine learning approaches could improve the accuracy of concussion assessments using ImPACT scores.
From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Bifactor-ESEM analysis of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) symptom inventory.
Time Frame: From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) includes a symptom inventory widely used to assess self-reported concussion symptoms in athletes. This study will only use the self-reported symptom scale from the ImPACT as the primary Outcome Measure, with no other sub-scores or assessments included. The ImPACT symptom scale includes 22 symptoms rated on a 0 to 6 severity scale, with 0 indicating no symptom and 6 indicating the most severe. The total symptom score, ranging from 0 to 132, will serve as the primary Outcome Measure. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. This study will apply Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM to examine the factor structure, evaluate general and specific symptom dimensions, and improve the interpretability of ImPACT symptom scores for more accurate clinical assessments.
From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic
Neurocognitive Composite Scores and Symptom Scale Scores from the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): Traditional vs Remote Administration
Time Frame: From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic

ImPACT is a widely utilized tool for assessing the cognitive function of collegiate athletes. Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive performance may vary depending on the environment in which concussion assessments are conducted.

The ImPACT test battery consists of the following components administered in sequential order: (1) Demographics, (2) Symptom Scale, (3) Word Memory, (4) Design Memory, (5) X's and O's, (6) Symbol Match, (7) Color Match, (8) Three Letters, (9) Word Memory Delayed Recall, and (10) Design Memory Delayed Recall. All tests are automatically scored by the software.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many student-athletes transitioned from traditional, in-person concussion assessments to remote, at-home testing. This study aims to determine whether remote testing yields results comparable to traditional testing, ensuring the accuracy and consistency of concussion assessments regardless of the testing environment.

From enrollment 1 year after becoming asymptomatic

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hyung Rock Lee, Ph.D, University of Central Arkansas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Concussion, Brain

Clinical Trials on Concussion Assessment Battery

Subscribe