Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy on Supraglottic Airway Devices Position

January 9, 2025 updated by: KMUHIRB-F(I)-20240331, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

The Effect of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Examination on Supraglottic Airway Devices Position in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

A comparison of SaCo VLMTM video laryngeal mask airway with the I-gel supraglottic airway during airway management in patients undergoing elective surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The position of the supraglottic airway is checked using a fiberoptic endoscope: The bronchoscope is placed at the opening of the laryngeal mask, and assessed using the following grading system: Grade 1: Vocal cords not visible. Grade 2: Vocal cords and anterior epiglottis visible. Grade 3: Vocal cords and posterior epiglottis visible. Grade 4: Only vocal cords visible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification I~III, age 18~65 y/o, BMI 18~30kg/m2, elective surgery, surgery duration < 2 hours, supine position, general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway insertion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking, betel nuts use, any known anatomical variation or disease of facial or airway structure, anticipated difficult airway, limited mouth opening distance or neck motility, loosening teeth, gastroesophageal reflux history, ongoing upper airway infection or inflammation symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Third-generation SADs (SaCoVLM)
The third-generation SADs (i.e. SaCoVLM™) combines video system and laryngeal mask with gastric drain.
The visualization of the glottic structures through the SaCoVLM™ imaging system is graded as follows: Grade1: Visibility of the lateral portion of the right epiglottic fold and part of the laryngeal inlet. Grade 2: Visibility of both epiglottic folds and part of the laryngeal inlet. Grade 3: Visibility of the laryngeal inlet and part of the vocal cords. Grade 4: Visibility of the entire vocal cords.
Active Comparator: Second-generation SADs (I-gel™)
The second-generation SADs (i.e. I-gel™) with a gastric drain conduit have designed to reduce the risk of gastric reflux and aspiration.
The visualization of the glottic structures through the SaCoVLM™ imaging system is graded as follows: Grade1: Visibility of the lateral portion of the right epiglottic fold and part of the laryngeal inlet. Grade 2: Visibility of both epiglottic folds and part of the laryngeal inlet. Grade 3: Visibility of the laryngeal inlet and part of the vocal cords. Grade 4: Visibility of the entire vocal cords.
The position of the i-Gel is checked using a fiberoptic endoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glottic visualization grades by fiberoptic exam assessment
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction to the end of surgery
Grade 1: vocal cords were not visualizedGrade 2: vocal cords and anterior epiglottis were visualizedGrade 3: vocal cords and posterior epiglottis were visualized Grade 4: vocal cords only were visualized
From anesthesia induction to the end of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-operative effectiveness
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction to the end of surgery
Secondary outcomes were evaluated by oropharyngeal sealing pressure, first attempt success rate, insertion time
From anesthesia induction to the end of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KMUHIRB-F(I)-20240331

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

not decided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraglottic Airway Devices Position

Clinical Trials on a native video image system

Subscribe