Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers and Telerehabilitation in Cerebral Palsy

August 26, 2025 updated by: Kutahya Health Sciences University

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers and Mobile Application-Supported Telerehabilitation in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

The inadequate number of rehabilitation sessions and the difficulties in accessing rehabilitation services for people with cerebral palsy result in delayed progress and low levels of physical activity for these people. As a result, it is well known that daily life often hinders the implementation of prescribed home programmes, leading to neglect. In the rehabilitation of people with cerebral palsy, physiotherapists face difficulties in monitoring patients and ensuring compliance with home exercise programmes. Both people with cerebral palsy and their carers often experience dissatisfaction and lack of motivation regarding the monitoring and control of development and activity.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation programme supported by a mobile application and a wearable activity tracker, in addition to a standard rehabilitation programme, on physical activity levels, quality of life, sleep quality, balance, activity participation and motivation, and patient satisfaction in people with cerebral palsy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kütahya
      • Kütahya, Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Kutahya Health Sciences University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 14 and 18 years old
  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Currently enrolled in a regular rehabilitation programme
  • Level 1-3 according to Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • No cognitive impairments affecting the understanding of exercise programmes
  • Voluntary informed consent to participate
  • No recent surgeries (e.g. botox, muscle relaxation) within the past 6 months
  • No socioeconomic issues related to the use of smart devices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The impact of recent surgical procedures or medical interventions on physical performance.
  • The influence of health conditions that affect the entire body and physical performance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control
Participants in the conventional exercise group will continue their standard rehabilitation program supplemented with printed home exercise instructions, including visuals and text, similar to the content provided to the TG.
Experimental: Telerehabilitation
Participants in the telerehabilitation group will receive weekly home exercise instructions through a mobile application installed on their or their caregivers' smartphones, in addition to their standard rehabilitation program. These instructions will include videos, reminders, and directives for the exercises, with compliance monitored through mini-surveys delivered via the app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents
Time Frame: Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
The PAQ-A was developed by Kowalski et al. in 1997 to assess physical activity levels in adolescents (Kowalski et al., 2004). It is suitable for the 14-20 age group. The questionnaire consists of nine questions and assesses physical activity levels over the past seven days. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted in 2017. PAQ-A contains eight questions scored between 1 and 5, with a ninth question asking about any condition that might have prevented physical activity during the past week. A score of "1" indicates low-intensity physical activity, while "5" indicates high-intensity physical activity. The ninth question is not included in the scoring. The total score is calculated by averaging the scores of all questions (Aygün Polat, 2017).
Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale
Time Frame: Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
The PAES is a satisfaction scale developed by Mullen et al., consisting of eight items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (Mullen, 2011). The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Bozkurt et al. (Bozkurt et al., 2022).
Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Teen
Time Frame: Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.

The CP-QoL Teen scale is a quality-of-life questionnaire designed for adolescents with cerebral palsy (Davis et al., 2013). Its Turkish adaptation was carried out by Çelik et al. (Çelik, 2012). The CP-QoL Teen scale has two versions: one for caregivers and one self-report version for adolescents. The adolescent self-report version consists of six categories: family and friends, school, participation, communication, health, special equipment, and pain and discomfort. These categories are evaluated under four sections: general well-being and participation, communication and physical health, school situation, and social well-being. The caregiver version includes two additional categories: service assessment and family health (Davis et al., 2013). Scoring involves two steps:

  1. Items are transformed to a scale with a possible range of 0-100;
  2. The algebraic mean of item values is computer for each domain.
Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
The PSQI is a scale that provides information on sleep quality and the type and severity of sleep disorders in the past month (Buysse et al., 1989). Sleep quality is evaluated based on sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ağargün et al. (Ağargün et al., 1996). Each question is scored between 0 and 3, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. A total score of less than 5 indicates "Good sleep quality," while a score of 5 or above indicates "Poor sleep quality."
Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
Trunk Control Measurement Scale
Time Frame: Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.
The TCMS is a valid and reliable scale for assessing trunk control in individuals with cerebral palsy (Heyrman, 2011). The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Özal et al. (Özal, 2019). The TCMS evaluates two main components of trunk control during functional activities: maintaining balance within the support surface and actively moving body parts. Therefore, the TCMS consists of two main sections: static sitting balance and dynamic sitting balance.
Prior to the commencement of the study and following a period of six weeks from the initiation of the application.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Telerehabilitation

Subscribe