Refractive Outcomes Utilizing Two SS-OCT Biometers for IOL Power Calculations

January 29, 2025 updated by: The Eye institute of Utah
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the potential refractive outcomes using the Argos 1.5 biometer in the surgical planning for cataract extraction to that obtained from IOLMaster 700. Both devices are used as standard of care in surgical planning optimization for patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cataract surgery is one of the most performed surgical procedures globally. The goal of the cataract surgeon is to implant an intraocular lens (IOL) with an appropriate IOL power to compensate for the refractive error and leave the patient emmetropic. The accurate measurement of ocular parameters is therefore critical for the effective calculation of IOL power, which directly impacts postoperative visual outcomes. However, accurate IOL power determination is influenced by several factors, including the measurement techniques employed and the specific biometers used in the process.

Optical biometry has become the gold standard for ocular measurements since the introduction of the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) in 2001. The IOLMaster 700 utilizes SWEPT Source OCT (SS-OCT) with a wavelength of about 1055 nm to generate a 2D OCT cornea-to-retina cross-section scan of the eye. This allows for the computation of all axial biometry measurements, including axial lengths (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depths (ACD), and lens thickness (LT).

A relatively newer biometer, Argos 1.5 is also non-invasive and based on SS-OCT technology for IOL power determination with a similar wavelength of 1060 nm ±10nm. However, the IOLMaster 700 uses a traditional axial length computation approach that relies on a single refractive index whiles Argos 1.5 uses a segmented axial length approach based on multiple refractive indices attributed to each ocular component often referred as True AL.

This study aims to evaluate and compare the potential refractive outcomes and biometric measurements of patients undergoing cataract surgery when using Argos 1.5 versus the IOLMaster 700 with the available formulas on each device. By analyzing these biometric measurements, we aim to uncover insights that could enhance our understanding of how different measurement techniques influence postoperative visual outcomes, ultimately contributing to improved patient care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects at least 21 years of age, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21 years or older (Adult age)
  • Assessed to have Cataract Grade 1 and above per LOCS III or Wisconsin Grading scale in at least one eye.
  • Able to comprehend and sign the informed consent form.
  • Potential postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 logMAR or better and targeted post-op refraction to be emmetropia, based on the investigator expert medical opinion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No active ocular infection or inflammation
  • Unable to fixate due to nystagmus or other eye movement abnormality (e.g., significant strabismus)
  • Contraindicated for pupil dilation (e.g., narrow angles, allergies) per medical judgement of the investigator.
  • Any ocular disease and/or condition that, in the investigator's clinical judgment, may put the subject at significant risk, may compromise study result or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Observational
No interventions will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in predicted refraction
Time Frame: 1 month
Predicted refraction is defined as the refractive power predicted by the IOL calculation formula. The predicted refraction for planned IOL power when using Argos 1.5 will be compared to IOL Master 700 for available formulae common to both devices (e.g. SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Holladay I, Holladay II etc.) using forest plots. Data for Barrett TAL [Argos only] will be analysed using descriptive statistics
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in the predicted IOL power for emmetropia
Time Frame: 1 month

The differences in IOL predicted power will be compared using descriptive statistics and forest plots.

For the second endpoint, we will be comparing the biometry measurements (ACD, CCT, WTW, LT, AL, K readings) from both devices for the same subject eye. The agreement will be quantified using Bland-Altman analysis for each measure for the total subject population.

1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zachary J Zavodni, MD, The Eye Institute of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 7, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 22, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12809-ZJZavodni

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Subscribe