- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06826417
Anxiety and Surgery Satisfaction for Cataract Patient With Different State Anxiety
Pain, Anxiety and Anesthetic Satisfaction for Patient With Different State Anxiety Underwent Cataract Surgery With Topical Anesthesia
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
BACKGROUNDS Nowadays, phacoemulsification for cataract treatment is the most common surgical procedure performed and anesthetics procedure has been shifted from retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia to topical anesthesia (TA). Phacoemulsification under TA is proved to be a safe and low risk procedure with the incidence of adverse events requiring medical emergency team interventions to be 0.04%. However, it is not uncommon that patients can suffer from pain, anxiety and unpleasant visual sensation during this procedure. Complementary sedation has long been thought to alleviate the anxiety and pain of the patient during surgery with local anesthesia. Studies revealed that approximate one fourth of the patients underwent phacoemulsification under TA or retrobulbar anesthesia requested additional intravenous sedation of midazolam. However, the intravenous sedation, such as midazolam, propofol, or etomidate, increase the risk of additional anesthetic complications of heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, and nausea, and therefore, anesthesia monitoring was mandatory during the surgery.
Compared with intravenous sedation, oral sedation is less costly and less invasive. Studies with different oral sedation agents revealed different effect. In the study of 41 patients serving themselves as control, patients reported more pain and photophobia in the surgery with TA alone than the other with midazolam syrup and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. However, two studies comparing oral diazepam or triazolam with intravenous midazolam showed similar rate of anxiety and pain or noninferior satisfaction. Moreover, the randomized control trial containing 50 procedures in each groups revealed that patients received TA alone during phacoemulsification reported similar pain or anxiety level to those received complementary intravenous midazolam.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chiun Ho Hou, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 262131 +88623123456
- Email: chiunhohou@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Taiwan
-
Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan, 100
- Recruiting
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Chiun Ho Hou, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 262131 +88623123456
- Email: chiunhohou@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 80 years old.
- Patients diagnosed with cataracts.
- Scheduled for cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation under surface anesthesia at National Taiwan University Hospital.
- No adverse reactions to oral anti-anxiety medication (XANAX).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of any contraindications for surgery before the procedure.
- Presence of any contraindications for medication before the procedure.
- Inability to provide clear and complete answers to relevant questionnaires, or expression of no preoperative anxiety during the outpatient visit, or scores below 21 on the STAI-S or STAI-T assessment.
- Regular use of anti-anxiety medications, sleeping pills, or analgesics before the procedure.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding during the preoperative period.
- Severe corneal diseases, overripe cataracts, small pupils, or lens dislocation leading to difficulties in conventional surgery.
- Patients under surface anesthesia who cannot fully cooperate with the surgical procedure.
- Pregnant or uncertain pregnancy status (women under 55 years old to be verbally asked by research team members).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial: in a double-blind manner, to receive a placebo (identical in appearance to Xanax but without any active effects)
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Xanax
|
double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial: in a double-blind manner, to receive Xanax
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: 1-3 months
|
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a psychological scale specifically designed to assess symptoms of anxiety.
The Chinese version has been translated and adapted for Chinese-speaking users.
The inventory consists of 21 items covering physiological and cognitive anxiety symptoms, such as palpitations, breathlessness, and tension.
Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3) based on the frequency or severity of symptoms, with a total score range of 0 to 63.
Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.
The BAI demonstrates strong reliability and validity, making it suitable for clinical diagnosis, psychological assessment, and research purposes.
It helps clinicians and researchers quickly understand an individual's anxiety levels and evaluate intervention effectiveness.
|
1-3 months
|
|
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S / STAI-T)
Time Frame: 1-3 months
|
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a psychological assessment tool designed to measure anxiety levels, focusing on state anxiety (SA) and trait anxiety (TA).
The Chinese version has been translated and culturally adapted for Chinese-speaking users.
The inventory comprises 40 items, with 20 items assessing state anxiety and 20 items assessing trait anxiety.
Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1 to 4), resulting in a total score range of 20 to 80 for both SA and TA.
Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety.
The STAI is widely recognized for its strong reliability and validity, making it suitable for clinical diagnosis, psychological assessment, and research purposes.
It is particularly valuable in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and understanding anxiety characteristics and trends across different populations.
|
1-3 months
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Surgical Procedure
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Anesthesia Type: Peribulbar, Topicalanesthesia Incision Area: Corneal, Limbal, Scleral.
Incision Location: O'clock position.
Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE): % / second.
Total Surgical Time: Minutes.
Phacoemulsifi cation Technique: Phaco-chop, Stop and chop, Divide and conquer.
IOL Type:Toric, Non-toric.
Capsular Tension Ring (CTR) Use: Yes, No. Suture Presence: Yes, No. Zonular Laxity: Yes, No. Degree of Fixation Loss: Perfect, Fair, Not cooperative, Severedeviation.
Number of Abnormal Head or Body Movements.
Surgical Complications:Capsular rupture, Vitreous loss, Hyphema, Iris prolapse, Others (specify).
|
1 days
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Surgical Procedure (Intraoperative Monitoring)
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Oxygen saturation (%).
|
1 days
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Surgical Procedure (Intraoperative Monitoring)
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Blood pressure (mmHg).
|
1 days
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Surgical Procedure (Intraoperative Monitoring)
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Heart rate (bpm).
|
1 days
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Pain Scale
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Surgical Outcome: Initial outcomes immediately after surgery, including corneal clarity, IOL positioning, and patient reaction.
Complication Management: Actions taken to address any intraoperative complications, such as hemostatic measures or additional medication.
Pain Assessment: Documentation of immediate postoperative pain levels and pain management interventions.
|
1 days
|
|
Cataract Surgery Records: Anesthesia Satisfaction Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1 days
|
The anesthesia satisfaction rating scale evaluates patients' satisfaction with the anesthesia experience during surgical procedures, focusing on factors such as pain management, comfort, and communication with the anesthesia team.
The scales typically use a numerical rating system, such as a 10-point scale, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
These tools are simple and effective for assessing patients' perspectives on specific aspects of their care.
The results are valuable for optimizing clinical procedures, improving patient experiences, and enhancing the quality of medical services.
|
1 days
|
|
Postoperative Follow-Up
Time Frame: 1 days
|
Bulbar Injection: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Anterior Chamber Reaction (AC Reaction): 0, 1, 2, 3,4. Corneal Edema: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) (IOP): ≤21, >21. bulbar injection(0 to 4 +) (0) no injection; (1) very slight; (2) slight; (3) moderate; (4) severe. Anterior chamberreaction (cell 0 to 4+) in a 1 x 1 mm slit-lamp beam (0) No cells; (1+) 5-10 cells ; (2+)11-20 cells ;(3+) 21-50 cells ; (4+) >50 cells. |
1 days
|
|
Postoperative Follow-Up (Postoperative Symptoms)
Time Frame: 1 days
|
None; Fatigue; Ataxia; Dizziness; Headache; Urinary retention; Amnesia; Muscle weakness; Nausea; Confusion; Disorientation; Restlessness; Others (specify).
|
1 days
|
|
Postoperative Satisfaction Pain Scale
Time Frame: 1 days
|
The pain scale is a tool for assessing patients' subjective perceptions of pain, widely used in clinical and research settings.
It typically employs numerical ratings (e.g., 0-10) or a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the most severe pain.
Patients select a score based on their experience, quantifying their pain levels in a straightforward manner.
This tool is commonly used in postoperative, chronic pain, or acute pain management, helping healthcare providers quickly understand patients' pain conditions and adjust treatment plans accordingly.
With its simplicity and high reliability, the pain scale is an essential standardized evaluation tool in the medical field.
|
1 days
|
|
Postoperative Satisfaction Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1 days
|
The postoperative satisfaction rating scale assesses overall satisfaction with the surgical experience, including pain relief, medical care, and service quality.
The scales typically use a numerical rating system, such as a 10-point scale, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
These tools are simple and effective for assessing patients' perspectives on specific aspects of their care.
The results are valuable for optimizing clinical procedures, improving patient experiences, and enhancing the quality of medical services.
|
1 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202302067MINB
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cataract Surgery
-
Matthew RauenNot yet recruitingNuclear Cataract | Cataract Surgery Anesthesia | Cataract and IOL Surgery | Cataract Surgery ExperienceUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityEnrolling by invitationIntraocular Lens | Cataract Extraction | Cataract Surgery | Eye Disorders | Cataract and IOL Surgery | Cataract Surgery ExperienceUnited States
-
Züleyha SönmezAtaturk UniversityActive, not recruitingCataract Surgery | Cataract Patients | Cataract After SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Colvard Kandavel Eye CenterEnrolling by invitationCataract | Cataract Bilateral | Cataract Surgery | Cataract (Post-operative Cataract Surgery Follow-up)United States
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeSingapore General HospitalCompletedCataract Surgery | Stress Levels | Music Improving Outcomes in Cataract SurgerySingapore
-
Vision Care Collective LimitedRayner Intraocular Lenses LimitedRecruitingRefractive Surgery | Cataract Surgery | Visual CorrectionUnited Kingdom
-
Utah Eye CentersRecruitingCataract Surgery | Correction Vision SurgeryUnited States
-
Seva Canada SocietyPragyaan Sustainable Health Outcomes Foundation; Divyajyoti Trust - Tejas Eye...Recruiting
-
Helix SurgicalSanté Atlantique - Saint-Herblain - FranceRecruiting
-
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryCompletedPatients' Information Level About Cataract Surgery | Patients' Attitude Before and After Cataract SurgeryAustria
Clinical Trials on Xanax
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedSedation | Perioperative Care | Older Adults | Cataract Surgery | Cognition FunctionUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoHoffmann-La RocheCompletedGeneralized Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Completed
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedHealthy SubjectsSingapore
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruitingCataract Surgery Anesthesia | Ophthalmology | Oral Anxiolytic | Satisfaction SurveyTaiwan
-
Timothy L. BrownNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); Cognitive Research... and other collaboratorsCompletedDriving Under the Influence | Driving BehaviorUnited States
-
Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaCompleted
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Investigacion Farmacologica y Biofarmaceutica, S.A. de C.V.Withdrawn
-
Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaCompleted
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Terminated