The Role of Attention in Modulating the Placebo Effect

February 10, 2025 updated by: Francesco Pagnini, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Effects of Attention and Placebo Modulation on Cycling Performance: an Experimental Study on Stationary Bikes

This project aims to examine whether these forms of attention to sensory information can modulate the mind-body interaction. This will be demonstrated through a study focused on the placebo effect with attention manipulation. Specifically, the project will focus on the construct of mindful attention to increase the precision of the likelihood and reduce the effects of priors, and on directed attention to modify the position and precision of the likelihood, hypothetically modulating the placebo effect.

The study involves recruiting 128 healthy individuals, who will be asked to cycle on an ergometer for approximately 60 minutes, with alternating phases in which attention will be manipulated. After an initial warm-up phase, they will receive a placebo drink, presented as "highly stimulating." An additional group of 32 participants will not receive either the placebo drink or the attentional stimuli, but will undergo the same training cycles. All participants will receive a pre-intervention assessment, and heart rate, emotions, and perceived fatigue will be monitored.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Milano
      • Milan, Milano, Italy, 20123
        • Recruiting
        • Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons (18+) in good health, verified by presenting a medical certificate (sporting, competitive or non-competitive, or of good health).
  • Be available to go to a gym. If not enrolled, the cost of admission is borne by the project.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, musculoskeletal injuries, upper respiratory tract infections;
  • allergy and/or intolerance to caffeine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Participants will be provided with a chest strap for heart rate measurement (the strap will be washed and disinfected after each session), connected to the Polar Beat app downloaded by the researcher. Subsequently, each participant will perform an initial 10-minute baseline warm-up session (a cadence of 70-80 RPM will be requested). From the cycle ergometer display, values for watts (the amount of work done per second), power (the amount of work done over a certain period of time), and speed (expressed in kilometers per hour) will also be extracted. During the test, no visual or verbal feedback will be provided. Participants will be blind to the cycle ergometer screen, so the data will not influence their behavior. Heart rate will be continuously recorded throughout the exercise period and during the participant's recovery. Participants will then be randomized to one of the following manipulations.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants will be provided with a chest strap for heart rate measurement (the strap will be washed and disinfected after each session), connected to the Polar Beat app downloaded by the researcher. Subsequently, each participant will perform an initial 10-minute baseline warm-up session (a cadence of 70-80 RPM will be requested). From the cycle ergometer display, values for watts (the amount of work done per second), power (the amount of work done over a certain period of time), and speed (expressed in kilometers per hour) will also be extracted. During the test, no visual or verbal feedback will be provided. Participants will be blind to the cycle ergometer screen, so the data will not influence their behavior. Heart rate will be continuously recorded throughout the exercise period and during the participant's recovery. Participants will then be randomized to one of the following manipulations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Numeric Rating Scale 0-10, where 10 indicates maximum fatigue.
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Heart rate beats, assessed with Polar H10 chest strap
30 minutes
Perceived efficacy of the energy drink
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Numeric Rating Scale 0-10, where 10 is the most effective.
30 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mindfulness
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Mindfulness Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS) is a widely used self-report measure designed to assess an individual's level of mindfulness, particularly focusing on present-moment awareness and attention. Developed by MacKillop and Anderson (2007), the scale evaluates the frequency of mindful states in everyday life, emphasizing the ability to remain attentive to and aware of current experiences. The MAAS has been extensively applied in both clinical and non-clinical settings to explore the relationship between mindfulness and various psychological and behavioral outcomes, such as stress reduction, emotional regulation, and overall well-being.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
Anxiety
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a widely used self-report measure designed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms. Developed by Beck et al. (1988), the scale focuses on somatic and subjective symptoms of anxiety, such as nervousness, fear, and physical sensations like sweating or dizziness. The BAI is commonly used in both clinical and research settings to screen for anxiety disorders, monitor symptom changes over time, and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Its reliability and ease of use make it a valuable tool for assessing anxiety across diverse populations.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
Stress
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used self-report tool designed to measure the level of stress an individual perceives in their daily life. Developed by Cohen et al. (1994), the scale evaluates how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overwhelming respondents find their life circumstances over the past month. The PSS is often employed in both research and clinical settings to assess stress levels, explore its impact on health outcomes, and monitor changes following interventions aimed at stress reduction. Its versatility and simplicity make it suitable for diverse populations and contexts.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
Optimism
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) is a psychological assessment tool designed to measure individual differences in dispositional optimism. Developed by Scheier et al. (1994), the LOT-R evaluates the extent to which individuals hold positive expectations about future outcomes. This self-report scale is widely used in both research and clinical settings to examine the role of optimism in psychological well-being, health outcomes, and coping strategies. Its concise format and strong psychometric properties make it a valuable instrument for exploring optimism across various populations and contexts.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
Cognitive flexibility
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS) is a self-report instrument designed to assess an individual's capacity to adapt their thinking and behavior in response to changing situations or environments. Developed by Martin and Rubin (1995), the scale evaluates key aspects of cognitive flexibility, including the ability to consider multiple perspectives, generate alternative solutions, and cope effectively with challenges. This tool is widely used in research and clinical settings to explore how cognitive flexibility influences problem-solving, resilience, and overall psychological well-being. Its straightforward design ensures usability across diverse populations.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
Personality traits
Time Frame: Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)
The Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) is a brief self-report measure designed to assess the five major dimensions of personality: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Developed as a shortened version of the original Big Five Inventory, it includes only 10 items, making it ideal for contexts where time is limited, while still providing reliable and valid results (Rammstedt & John, 2007). Despite its brevity, the BFI-10 retains the ability to capture key personality traits and is widely used in psychological research and applied settings to gain insights into individual differences.
Once, at the baseline (pre-experiment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Francesca NA Grosso, MD, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Università Cattolica del Sacro

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe