Recovery Strategies Based on Mindfulness and Physical Exercise on Levels of Stress and Inmunoglobulin A (ERME-IgA)

Differential Effectiveness of Two Recovery Strategies, Based on Mindfulness and Physical Exercise, on Levels of Stress, Academic Performance, and Inmunoglobulin A. A Controlled Trial. A, and Cortisol. A Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study aims to compare the differential effects of mindfulness meditation (MBI) and physical exercise (PE) on different stress, academic performance and health variables (self-report means and biological measure of IgA levels). A controlled trial of three groups is proposed, with pretest, posttest and two follow-ups at 1 and 3 months that would be developed among the Guardia Civil (Spanish military police) non-commissioned officers and officers academies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recovery from fatigue and daily stress involves mentally disconnecting from the journal. To achieve this disconnection (or psychological detachment), research has shown that engaging in a variety of interesting and motivating activities for individuals after the day allows them to achieve this disconnected state of mind and, consequently, facilitates recovery from work.

Previous research has shown that two of the most effective recovery activities are physical exercise (PE) and mindfulness meditation (MBI), although the results on the differential effects of the two are not conclusive (Karabinski et al, 2021; Steed et al., 2021; Wendsche et al., 2021).

Thus, the present study aims to compare the differential effects of MBI and PE on different stress, academic performance and health variables (self-report means and biological measure of IgA salivary levels). A non-randomized controlled trial (participant chooses to take of three groups proposed) with pretest, posttest and two follow-ups at 1 and 3 months. It would be developed among the Guardia Civil (Spanish military police) non-commissioned officers and officers academies (N ≥ 150). An MBI (focused attention meditations), an aerobic PE program (running with mental association strategies) and an inactive control / waiting list (LE) condition will be contrasted.

The dependent variables considered are: 1) recovery experiences; 2) perceived stress; 3) general health; 4) academic performance; 5) positive and negative affect; 7) daily states of fatigue, stress, psychological distancing, mindfulness, and sleep; 8) IgA levels in saliva. The intervention program is structured for four weeks, during which the two intervention groups will carry out their recovery strategy (MBI or PE), starting and increasing the practice 5 minutes every two weeks. The control group will continue as usual. The investigators believe that this study is a quasi-pioneering initiative because of its theme, and will have an important scientific and technical impact. The importance of the topic addressed in terms of health and academic performance is associated with important contributions in terms of knowledge transfer to the educational field and society in general.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Raquel Ruiz Iñiguez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 65 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently practicing any type of meditation regularly.
  • To have a physical or mental illness that prevents mindfulness practice.
  • To take medication that interferes with salivary inmunoglobulin A (SIgA).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI)
A 4-week mindfulness-based intervention comprised of focused attention meditations. From 15 to 30 minutes of practice per session, four times/week through audio guides.
A mindfulness instructor will guide focused attention meditations that will last from 15 to 30 minutes. Participants will be instructed at the beginning of the intervention and will have audio files to guide the exercises during their practice.
Active Comparator: Physical exercise (PE)
A 4-week physical exercise intervention comprised of running with mental association strategies. From 15 to 30 minutes of practice per session, three times/week through workout audio guides.
An instructor will guide to running with mental association strategies that will last from 15 to 30 minutes. Participants will be instructed at the beginning of the intervention and will have audio files to guide the exercises during their practice.
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
The participants will continue their daily activity and obligations in the academy as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Salivary Immunoglobulin A (SIgA) with four time points data.
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week before interventions), Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up
Biological measures. Salivary IgA levels as a biomarker of mucosal immunity.
Baseline (1 week before interventions), Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up
Change in General Health with four time points data.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) consists of 12 items. It is a unidimensional measure of psychological distress. It is answered on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 4 (1 = Never and 4 = Always). The score was used to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 36. Total scores range from 0 to 36 with a score of 11 or 12 considered typical, scores > 15 suggesting evidence of distress, and scores > 20 are considered severe problems with psychological distress.
Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
Change in stress with four time points data.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
A single item was used: Stress refers to a person's situation when they feel tense, restless, nervous, or anxious, or are unable to sleep at night because their mind is constantly preoccupied with work-related issues. Please indicate the extent to which you currently feel this type of stress. It has five possible responses on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5 (being 1 nothing and 5 a lot), with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress
Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
Change in Need for Recovery with four time points data.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up

The Need for Recovery (NFR) Scale consists of 9 items. It facilitates the understanding of the factors that can lead to sustainable working and employability. It is answered on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5 (1 = Never and 5 = Always).

The score was used to generate a total score ranging from 1 to 100.Our research team will carry the validation of the Spanish version of NFR. The higher the score, the higher the fatigue symptoms presented by the worker.

Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
Change in Academic Performance with four time points data.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (grades before the interventions start), 1 and 3-month follow-up (grades after the interventions finish)
Academic performance will be measured directly through the grades obtained in the academy (by course and by subject).
Pre-treatment (grades before the interventions start), 1 and 3-month follow-up (grades after the interventions finish)
Change in Positive and Negative Affect with four time points data.
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up
The PANAS Scales of Positive and Negative Affect (PANAS) - Spanish version has 20 items. It is the most widely used scale of affectivity. It has two dominant dimensions, positive affect (10 items) and negative affect (10 items) It is answered on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5 (1 = Very slightly or Not at all and 5 = Extremely). The score was used to generate a total score ranging from 20 to 100. For the total positive score, a higher score indicates more of a positive affect. For the total negative score, a lower score indicates less of a negative affect.
Pre-treatment (the day the interventions start), Post-treatment (4 weeks from the start of the interventions), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fatigue (single-item measure from the Single-Item Fatigue Measure)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Single-Item on fatigue level:" Indicate what level of fatigue you felt today". The response is recorded on a 5-point Likert scale varying from "not at all" to "very much".
Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Change in Psychological distancing (item n. 3 from the Recovery Experience Questionnaire).
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Single-Item on Psychological distancing level: "After work, I have been able to disconnect". The response is recorded on a 5-point Likert scale varying from "not at all" to "very much".
Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Change in Sleep (item n. 6 from the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index).
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Single-Item on Sleep: "How did you sleep last night?". The responses are articulated on a 5-point Likert scale varying from "very bad" to "very good".
Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Change in Stress (single-item measure from the Single-item Measure of Stress Symptoms).
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Single-Item on work stress: "Indicate the extent to which you have felt stressed, tense, nervous, or anxious today". The response is recorded on a 5-point Likert scale varying from "not at all" to "very much".
Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Change in Mindfulness (item n. 3 from the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire).
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions
Single-Item on attention: "Today it has been difficult for me to be attentive to what required my attention at all times". The response is recorded on a 5-point Likert scale varying from "not at all" to "very much".
Time Frame: 4 days per week during the 4-week interventions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PID2019-110490RB-I00 (3)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based intervention

3
Subscribe