Clinical Study of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Disorders

February 14, 2025 updated by: YiCheng Zhu

The aim of this clinical trial was to determine whether rhythmic auditory stimulation is effective in treating gait disorders in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, primary Parkinson's disease, and various parkinsonism syndromes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does rhythmic auditory stimulation increase walking speed in patients with gait disorders? To determine whether rhythmic auditory stimulation is effective in treating gait disorders, researchers will compare a gait rhythmometer with an active control that does not receive rhythmic stimulation.

Participants will:

Gait training was conducted once a day for 15 minutes for 7 consecutive days Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) was performed before and after treatment Feedback on subjective improvement at the end of the 7-day treatment

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

For post-stroke hemiplegia

Inclusion criteria :

  • Age 50-80 years old
  • One or more strokes (cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage), with the most recent stroke occurring at least 6 months earlier
  • Walking independently without a cane or walking aid with obvious gait asymmetry
  • 0.4m/s< baseline velocity <0.8m/s
  • Sufficient hearing, vision and comprehension to complete motor function tests
  • Patients were willing and able to participate in all study procedures and signed informed consent
  • No other rehabilitation treatment was received at present

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to cooperate with the motor function test
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
  • With bone and joint diseases, such as a history of lower limb fracture within 1 year, waist and lower limb bone and joint surgery, bone and joint deformity seriously affecting walking, etc.
  • Except for stroke, there was no parkinsonism, myasthenia gravis, poliomyelitis and other nervous system diseases affecting the walking function of patients.

For primary Parkinson's disease (PD)

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 50-80 years old
  • PD met the diagnostic criteria of Chinese Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease (2016 edition)
  • Obvious panic gait, freezing gait or slow gait, but can walk independently without the use of a cane or walking aid
  • Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) stage 2-4
  • 0.4m/s< baseline velocity <0.8m/s
  • Sufficient hearing, vision and comprehension to complete motor function tests
  • Patients were willing and able to participate in all study procedures and signed informed consent
  • No other rehabilitation treatment was received at present

Exclusion criteria:

  • Unable to cooperate with the motor function test
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
  • With bone and joint diseases, such as a history of lower limb fracture within 1 year, waist and lower limb bone and joint surgery, bone and joint deformity seriously affecting walking, etc
  • There was no stroke, myasthenia gravis, poliomyelitis and other neurological diseases affecting the walking function except for primary Parkinson's disease

For Parkinsonism syndrome:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 50-80 years old
  • All parkinsonism syndrome except primary Parkinson's disease, including but not limited to drug-induced parkinsonism, multiple system atrophy, cerebral small vessel disease-related parkinsonism, etc
  • obvious panic gait, freezing gait or slow gait, but can walk independently without the use of a cane or walking aid
  • 0.4m/s< baseline velocity <0.8m/s
  • Sufficient hearing, vision and comprehension to complete motor function tests
  • Be willing and able to participate in all study procedures and sign informed consent
  • No other rehabilitation treatment was received at present.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Unable to cooperate with the motor function test
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
  • With bone and joint diseases, such as a history of lower limb fracture within 1 year, waist and lower limb bone and joint surgery, bone and joint deformity seriously affecting walking, etc
  • There was no stroke, myasthenia gravis, poliomyelitis and other neurological diseases that affected the walking function except for parkinsonism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rhythm intervention group
The intervention group was treated with a gait rhythm device under the supervision of the researchers. The complete gait training was conducted once a day for 15 minutes for 7 consecutive days. Each patient wore inertial sensors at both ankles during gait training to collect gait information during walking.
Sham Comparator: Active control group
The control group received gait training without rhythmic auditory stimulation under the supervision of the researchers. The complete gait training was conducted once a day for 15 to 20 minutes for 7 consecutive days. Each patient wore inertial sensors at both ankles during gait training to collect gait information during walking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the gait speed measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline gait speed
10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stride length
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride length (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride length.
10 days
Stride frequency
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride frequency (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride frequency.
10 days
Stride speed
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride speed (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride speed.
10 days
Swing speed
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the swing speed (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline swing speed.
10 days
Standing phase
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the standing phase (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline standing phase.
10 days
Turn time
Time Frame: 10 days
The difference between the turn time measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline turn time.
10 days
Patient's SUBJECTIVE assessment
Time Frame: 10 days
All subjects were asked about their subjective feelings using a uniform questionnaire, including the following questions: Did the patient's gait problems improve after 7 days of treatment? If there has been improvement, in what ways? (Step speed, stride length, symmetry, turn time, etc.)
10 days
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: 10 days
At baseline and on the third day after completion of the 7-day gait treatment, 3T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was performed to compare the changes of local neural activity, including amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and functional connectivity density (FCD).
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yicheng Zhu

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on rhythmic auditory stimulation

Subscribe