Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone for ICU Analgesia

This study is a prospective, single-center clinical study to evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an analgesic drug in ICU, and to compare it with remifentanil, a traditional sedative drug. These conclusions can guide us to understand the characteristics of analgesic drugs, carry out appropriate pain management, improve the status of ICU patients, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will be carried out in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. It is expected that 300 ICU patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation and needed analgesia and sedation will be included. The RASS and CPOT scores of 300 patients after using hydromorphone or remifentanil were collected and stored in the clinical trial sample database to evaluate and record the relevant indicators of the subjects. The relevant medical records in clinical treatment were analyzed and studied. Each subject will be numbered and a separate medical record established.

The purpose of this prospective single-center observational clinical study is to : 1 ) evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an ICU analgesic ; 2 ) Compared with the traditional sedative drug remifentanil. Including gastrointestinal dysfunction, respiratory depression, sedative use, mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, extubation failure rate, etc.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 226000
        • Emergency Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation requiring analgesia and sedation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years;
  • For patients requiring sedation and analgesia in ICU, invasive mechanical ventilation time is expected to be ≥24 hours;
  • Obtain informed consent from patients or family members.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age, or over 75 years of age;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Known or suspected allergy to opioids (e.g., fentanyl, remifentanil, hydromorphone), butorphanol, midazolam.
  • General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
  • Acute bronchial asthma.
  • Acute intestinal obstruction.
  • General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
  • ECG QT interval: male >450 mm seconds, female >470 ms.
  • Failure to obtain informed consent or authorization;
  • Participate in other exploratory clinical trials within 6 months prior to screening;
  • Severe hemodynamic instability (requires epinephrine greater than 0.5ug/kg/min to maintain MAP>65mmHg, or malignant arrhythmias frequently occur)
  • Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors.
  • Chronic pain requires long-term analgesics (>3 months).
  • Severe, pre-existing substantial liver disease with clinically significant portal hypertension, Child-Pugh grade C cirrhosis, or acute liver failure;
  • Patients with acute and chronic renal insufficiency requiring dialysis treatment;
  • Severe craniocerebral injury, brain tumor, increased intracranial pressure, cerebrovascular accident, coma, epileptic status, etc.
  • Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse;
  • Any condition that prevents the correct assessment of cognitive function, such as speech and sensory disorders or mental disorders (language difficulties or organic mental dysfunction);
  • any other conditions which the investigator considers inappropriate for registration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients treated with hydromorphone and midazolam
no-intervention
Patients treated with remifentanil and midazolam
no-intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RASS score
Time Frame: The RASS score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score was used to assess the patient's calm state.The maximum value of the score table is 5 and the minimum value is - 4, indicating that the patient 's sedation level changes from ' coma ' to ' aggressive '.The higher the score, the worse the patient 's sedation depth and sedation quality.
The RASS score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
CPOT score
Time Frame: The CPOT score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
Critical care Pain Observation Tool score is used to evaluate the degree of pain in critically ill patients.The maximum value of the score table is 10, and the minimum value is 0.The higher the score, the more serious the pain of the patient.
The CPOT score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Researchers hope to study data confidentiality.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on no-intervention

Subscribe