Clinical Utility of Early vs. Late Blood Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease (ADELAIDE)

December 9, 2025 updated by: C2N Diagnostics

A Study of the Clinical Effect of the Implementation of a Blood Biomarker Into Memory Clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs and Other Closed System Healthcare Memory and Dementia Sites in the United States

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether use of the PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker assay with early result disclosure along with discretionary Precivity-ApoE proteotype testing will shorten the time to Alzheimer's Disease or non-Alzheimer's diagnosis as compared to delayed result disclosure.

Participants will be randomized into the early PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test & disclosure group (Cohort A) or to the later PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test & disclosure group (Cohort B) where blood samples will be collected and tested using the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 90). Participants will attend study visits for one year after their enrollment. An optional sub-study will be offered to collect information through questionnaires at each visit regarding participant's and their care-giver's experiences through the AD diagnostic journey.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Healthcare providers engaged in memory care and Alzheimer's disease (AD) management have shown significant interest in the performance of plasma tests. A collaboration with Veteran's Affairs (VA) and other closed healthcare systems represents an opportunity to examine the clinical validity and utility of blood biomarkers (BBM). The ADELAIDE study is a prospective, randomized, clinical utility, economic impact and real-world study. The BBM test under study is the PrecivityAD2 blood test that uses high-resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure plasma Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 ratios. This study will assess and quantify the impact of BBM testing to overall time-to-diagnosis and time to prescription of an appropriate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or non-AD therapy. Additionally, this study will assess the impact of BBM testing to procedure utilization and overall costs of healthcare and will assess the diagnostic confidence of clinicians that order the test.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Minimum age: 50 years.
  2. Patients presenting with symptoms of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or other cognitive impairments in which the enrolling clinician clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary cause of symptomatic presentation
  3. Patients presenting with mixed brain pathologies including MCI/ cognitive impairments in which the investigator clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary or contributing cause of symptomatic presentation
  4. Patients are able to attend study visits and standard care visits over the period of 1 year from the date of enrollment
  5. Patients are able to undergo routine phlebotomy and provide up to six (6) 10 ml tube(s) of blood for study related tests plus any additional blood necessary for standard laboratory testing at each study timepoint
  6. Patients are able to undergo standard care diagnostic procedures to include MRI (or CT), amyloid PET and/or CSF biomarker testing for AD diagnosis if prescribed by investigator
  7. Patients are able to provide informed consent. Or, if in the opinion of the clinician, the patient is unable to adequately understand the nature of the trial and protocol requirements, a family member or appropriate representative of the patient is present to consent, with additional assent by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients younger than 50 years of age
  2. Patients being evaluated for cognitive impairment known to be predominantly the result of a disease or condition other than AD
  3. Patients previously diagnosed with AD, unless the ADELAIDE investigator has a strong clinical suspicion suggestive of an incorrect initial diagnosis upon referral
  4. Patients with no cognitive impairment or clinical symptoms of AD
  5. Patients desiring genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease markers without current cognitive impairment or other relevant clinical symptoms
  6. Patients who are not able or not willing to undergo standard care diagnostic procedures to include MRI (or CT), amyloid PET and/or CSF biomarker testing for AD diagnosis as prescribed by investigator
  7. Patients who are not able to understand the nature of the study nor the study requirements and not represented by a family member or other appropriate representative who is able to consent on behalf of the patient
  8. Patients who are not able to commit to attending the required study and/or standard care visits
  9. Patients who are not able to undergo routine phlebotomy or provide blood samples in the quantity required by the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Testing Group (Cohort A)
Participants in this group will have blood drawn from the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (Day 0). Physicians will use these results in clinical decision-making from that point forward.
Participants in Cohort A will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 1, with results disclosed shortly after testing.
Experimental: Delayed Testing Group (Cohort B)
Participants in this group will have blood drawn for the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 2 (Day 90). Until then, standard clinical decision-making will process without access to PrecivityAD2 results.
Participants in Cohort B will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 2, with results disclosed shortly after testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to achieve >=90% Diagnostic Confidence for AD or Non-AD
Time Frame: From enrollment until diagnosis, with primary assessment at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180).
Number of days from enrollment to achieving a diagnostic confidence score of >=90% for AD or non-AD diagnosis (based on physician survey).
From enrollment until diagnosis, with primary assessment at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180).
Proportion of Patients with AD of Non-AD Diagnosis
Time Frame: Assessed at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180)
Proportion of patients with a confirmed AD or non-AD diagnosis with a diagnostic confidence score of >=90%.
Assessed at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Initiation or Modification of AD or Non-AD Therapy
Time Frame: Measured from enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365).
Number of days from enrollment to the prescription, initiation, or modification of an AD or non-AD therapy. Data will be sourced from medical records and recorded in eCRF.
Measured from enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365).
Proportion of patients on AD or non-AD prescription
Time Frame: Assessed at Visit 3 (150-210)
Proportion of patients on AD or non-AD prescription (e.g., DMT, treatments for DLB/PDD or VaD, cholinesterase inhibitors, other) at Visit 3 (150-210).
Assessed at Visit 3 (150-210)
Number and Type of Diagnostic Tests Ordered
Time Frame: Evaluated cumulatively at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180), and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Total number and type of additional diagnostic tests ordered (e.g., amyloid PET, MRI, CSF biomarkers) from Visit 2 (Day 90) through the date of AD or non-AD diagnosis with physician confidence >=90%. Data will be collected via physician-reported case forms.
Evaluated cumulatively at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180), and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Change in Physician Diagnostic Confidence
Time Frame: Collected at Enrollment/Baseline (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Comparison of physician reported confidence of AD or non-AD diagnosis (0-100%) before and after receiving PrecivityAD2 results. Confidence scores will be collected by physician survey.
Collected at Enrollment/Baseline (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Experience with Diagnostic Process
Time Frame: Collected at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Patient-reported experience with the diagnostic journey, including perception of the clarity and utility of PrecivityAD2 results. Assessed using patient surveys.
Collected at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Caregiver-Reported Perception of Disease Burden
Time Frame: Collected at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Caregiver-reported assessment of disease burden, changes in the patient's condition, and perceived impact on daily life. Collected through structured caregiver surveys.
Collected at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Healthcare Utilization and Costs
Time Frame: Enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365)
Total healthcare costs associated with diagnostic evaluations, physician visits, and treatments. Healthcare utilization and cost data will be collected from medical records and analyzed retrospectively after Visit 4 (Day 365).
Enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Vice President, Neurology, C2N Diagnostics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimers Disease

Clinical Trials on PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing

Subscribe