- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06867757
Targeted Realtime Assessment of Chronic Pain in Youth (TRAC-Pain)
Targeted Realtime Assessment of Chronic Pain (TRAC-Pain) in Youth
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Up to 5% of adolescents (~3.5 million in the US alone) suffer from high-impact chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, affecting quality of life, school attendance, mood, and family function, and posing a significant economic burden of $19.5 billion annually in the US. A substantial proportion of these youths continue to suffer from pain into adulthood. Chronic MSK pain is characterized by a complex biological response, including physiological disturbances in cognition, sleep, and energy levels (fatigue), and is associated with impairments in both physical and emotional function. The chronic pain experience fluctuates over time with intra- and inter-daily variations and the occurrence of pain flares, contributing to unpredictability, uncertainty, and greater impairment.
Current gold standard self-report assessments are burdensome and fail to provide comprehensive, reliable measures of the pain experience due to inherent recall bias. A potential solution lies in the widespread adoption of digital health technologies, particularly wearable devices, which offer continuous monitoring of physiological, sleep, and physical activity data. This approach can yield unprecedented insights into individual health, informing diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, and treatment.
Through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), several groundbreaking digital biosignatures of human health have been developed by the research team, including those for glucose variability, preterm birth, panic attacks, fall risk, and surgical recovery. This real-time, personalized approach not only empowers patients but also enables healthcare providers to make more informed decisions, optimizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes. Despite these advancements, less than half of adolescents with chronic MSK pain who undergo pain treatment experience meaningful improvement.
The scientific rationale of this proposal is to overcome the limitations of self-report by integrating precise physiological, sleep, and physical activity measures from wearable devices with AI/ML to develop and validate a monitoring digital biosignature of the individual pain experience in youth with MSK pain. This biosignature will monitor the pain experience, track its progression, assess responses to interventions, and evaluate impacts on quality of life.
The research team is well positioned to execute these aims with: (1) a diverse, highly skilled team with expertise in digital technology, AI/ML, digital endpoint development, and clinical trials, alongside clinical expertise in chronic pain in youth and lived experience from patients, caregivers, and pain advocacy groups; (2) a secure, scalable, centralized, and standardized digital data collection, processing, and storage system; and (3) cutting-edge preliminary data supporting the capability to develop this digital health biosignature.
UG3/Discovery Phase: The research team will enroll up to 500 youth (ages 14-24) with chronic MSK pain, capturing continuous physiological (heart, respiratory), sleep, and physical (activity level, mobility, gait) activity metrics via wearables. Repeated intra-daily self-reports of the pain experience (pain interference, pain intensity, fatigue, mood, stress, pain flares) will be collected over 12 weeks. For a subset, data from physical and social stress tasks will also be gathered. The aim is to assess feasibility and relevance, develop a digital biosignature of the pain experience, and prepare for the UH3 phase through outreach and collaboration. Consultations with individuals with lived experience, those experiencing health disparities, and the FDA will ensure the relevance and acceptability of the biosignature and promote recruitment of underrepresented youth, coupled with scalability for clinical use.
UH3/Validation Phase: The research team will enroll up to 400 diverse youth with chronic MSK pain, capturing wearable and self-reported pain experience metrics over 12 weeks: a 4-week baseline followed by 8 weeks of abnormal reading-triggered alerts. The aim of this phase is to clinically validate the digital biosignature of the pain experience, and evaluate the accuracy and potential of an enhanced wellness alert system.
Significance and Clinical Impact: The successful development and validation of digital endpoints for the pain experience are crucial for advancing pain management. These endpoints promise to improve therapeutic development by providing robust, objective measures of treatment response. The outcomes of this study will be foundational for seeking regulatory approval for the commercialization of the associated software or for disseminating open-source analysis packages for future clinical trials.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jeremy Giberson, MAS
- Phone Number: 650-723-5814
- Email: jgiberso@stanford.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sahrish Masood, BHSc
- Email: sahrishm@stanford.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
- Recruiting
- Stanford University
-
Principal Investigator:
- Laura Simons, PhD
-
Contact:
- Jeremy Giberson, MAS
- Phone Number: 650-723-5814
- Email: jgiberso@stanford.edu
-
Contact:
- Sahrish Masood, BHSc
- Email: sahrishm@stanford.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient has musculoskeletal pain in 1 or more anatomic regions.
- Pain persists for > 3 months.
- Pain is associated with significant distress or life interference.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant cognitive impairment (e.g., unable to communicate)
- Hospitalization in the past 30 days for something other than their pain condition
- Currently undergoing treatment for cancer
- Reports only headache, orofacial, or visceral pain
- Currently pregnant or think you might become pregnant in the next 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
TRAC-Pain Cohort
For 12 weeks, participants will wear a smartwatch for continuous physiological, sleep, and physical activity monitoring, and complete daily self-reported surveys on pain, mood, and stress.
At the end of the study, participants will complete a stress task (Trier Social Stress Task) and a functional task (Sit-to-Stand Test) along with a feedback interview.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) Scale
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The PEG scale, a subset of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), evaluates pain intensity and its impact on enjoyment of life and general activity using a ranked scale (score 0 = "no interference" to 10 = "highest level of interference") with a higher score reflecting greater disruption in daily functioning.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Present Pain
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Present pain assesses the intensity of current pain using a ranked scale (0 = "no pain" to 10 = "the worst possible pain") with a higher score reflecting greater pain severity.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Fatigue
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Fatigue measures the level of fatigue experienced using a ranked scale (0 = "no fatigue" to 10 = "the most extreme fatigue") with a higher score indicating greater exhaustion.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Stress Level
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Stress Level evaluates the severity of stress using a ranked scale (0 = "no stress" to 10 = "the highest level of stress") with a higher score reflecting increased stress intensity.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Activity Level
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for activity level assesses a person's level of physical activity using a ranked scale (0 = "no activity" to 10 = "the highest possible level of activity") with a higher score reflecting greater engagement in physical activity.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Sleep Quality evaluates the quality of sleep using a ranked scale (0 = "the worst possible sleep quality" to 10 = "the best possible sleep quality") with a higher score reflecting better sleep quality.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale - Short Form (ASWS-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale - Short Form (ASWS-SF) evaluates sleep patterns and quality in adolescents using a ranked scale (0 = "worst possible sleep quality" to 10 = "best possible sleep quality"), with a higher score reflecting better sleep quality.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Adverse Events scale monitors for any adverse effects related to the intervention, tracking their frequency and severity, with higher values indicating a greater number or severity of adverse events.
|
As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) evaluates pain severity and its interference with daily functioning using a 10-point Likert scale (0 = "no pain/interference" to 10 = "worst possible pain/interference"), with a higher score indicating greater pain severity and disruption.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Child Activity Limitations Interview-9 (CALI-9)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Child Activity Limitations Interview-9 (CALI-9) assesses activity limitations due to pain in children and adolescents using a ranked scale (0 = "no activity limitations" to 10 = "unable to engage in any activities"), with a higher score reflecting greater restrictions in daily activities.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2)
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2) screens for generalized anxiety symptoms using two questions, scored on a scale from 0 to 6 (0 = "no anxiety symptoms" to 6 = "severe anxiety symptoms"), with a higher score indicating greater anxiety severity.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Healthcare Use Diary
Time Frame: As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Healthcare Use Diary records the frequency and type of healthcare services used, with higher values indicating greater healthcare utilization.
|
As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2) measures the sensory, affective, and evaluative dimensions of pain using a ranked scale (0 = "no pain" to 10 = "worst possible pain"), with a higher score indicating more severe pain experiences.
|
Baseline
|
|
National Institute on Drug Abuse-2 (NIDA-2)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The National Institute on Drug Abuse-2 (NIDA-2) screens for substance use risk and behaviors using a 0 to 6 scale (0 = "no substance use risk" to 6 = "highest substance use risk"), with a higher score indicating increased risk.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Time Frame: Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) measures the likelihood of recommending the intervention to others using a scale from 0 to 10 (0 = "not at all likely to recommend" to 10 = "extremely likely to recommend"), with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction.
|
Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Children (PCS-C)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Children (PCS-C) assesses negative thoughts and feelings related to pain using six questions, scored from 0 to 24 (0 = "no catastrophizing" to 24 = "highest level of catastrophizing"), with a higher score indicating greater pain-related distress
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Pain Flare
Time Frame: As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Pain Flare scale tracks the occurrence and severity of pain flare-ups using a ranked scale (0 = "no pain flare" to 10 = "worst possible pain flare"), with a higher score reflecting more intense and frequent pain exacerbations
|
As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Pain Wellness Behaviors
Time Frame: As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Pain Wellness and Daily Events scale logs daily wellness activities and notable events that might affect pain levels, providing insight into patterns and triggers.
|
As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Pain Wellness and Daily Events
Time Frame: As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Pain Wellness Behaviors scale assesses engagement in behaviors that promote pain management and overall wellness using a ranked scale (0 = "no engagement in wellness behaviors" to 10 = "consistent engagement in wellness behaviors"), with a higher score reflecting greater adherence to positive health behaviors.
|
As needed, from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measures the patient's overall perception of improvement using a ranked scale (0 = "no improvement" to 10 = "greatest possible improvement"), with a higher score indicating greater perceived positive change.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) screens for depressive symptoms using two questions, scored from 0 to 6 (0 = "no depressive symptoms" to 6 = "severe depressive symptoms"), with a higher score indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue (PROMIS Fatigue)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue (PROMIS-Fatigue) evaluates the frequency and intensity of fatigue using a ranked scale (0 = "no fatigue" to 10 = "most severe fatigue"), with a higher score indicating greater fatigue severity.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 8c (PROMIS Physical Function)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 8c (PROMIS Physical Function) measures physical functioning capabilities and limitations using a ranked scale (0 = "severe limitations" to 10 = "no limitations"), with a higher score indicating better physical function.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Stress Experiences Short Form 4a (PROMIS Stress)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Stress Experiences Short Form 4a (PROMIS Stress) assesses perceived stress levels over the past seven days using a ranked scale (0 = "no stress" to 10 = "highest level of stress"), with a higher score indicating greater stress.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - 10 Item (PANAS-10)
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - 10 Item (PANAS-10) measures both positive and negative affect using ten items, scored separately from 0 to 50 (0 = "no affect" to 50 = "highest affect intensity"), with a higher score reflecting greater emotional intensity.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) scale assesses factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and environment that influence health outcomes, with a higher score indicating greater social risk factors.
|
Baseline
|
|
Theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA)
Time Frame: Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) scale evaluates participant perceptions of an intervention's acceptability using a ranked scale (0 = "not acceptable" to 10 = "highly acceptable"), with a higher score reflecting greater acceptance and perceived usefulness.
|
Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Usage metrics
Time Frame: Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
The Usage Metrics scale assesses participant engagement with the intervention by tracking hours of smartwatch wear, percentage of completed surveys, and check-ins, with higher values indicating greater adherence and participation.
|
Daily from baseline to discharge, for a duration of 12 weeks
|
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life 2 Item (WHOQOL-2)
Time Frame: Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The World Health Organization Quality of Life 2 Item (WHOQOL-2) measures overall quality of life and general health using a ranked scale (0 = "worst quality of life" to 10 = "best quality of life"), with a higher score indicating better quality of life and health perception.
|
Baseline and Discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Pediatric Pain Screening Tool (PPST)
Time Frame: Baseline and discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
The Pediatric Pain Screening Tool (PPST) is a 9-item self-report measure designed to assess both physical and psychosocial aspects of pain in youth
|
Baseline and discharge (at 12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 77005
- UG3NS139943 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain
-
Sykehuset i Vestfold HFCompletedBack Pain | Musculoskeletal Pain | Chronic Pain | Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions | Pain, Chronic | Musculoskeletal Disorder | Musculoskeletal Neck PainNorway
-
Atlas UniversityNot yet recruitingOccupational Diseases | Neck Pain | Endodontics | Dentistry | Neck Pain Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal Disorder of the Neck | Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders | Musculoskeletal Assessment | Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Uppsala UniversityDalarna County Council, Sweden; Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Sweden; REHSAM, SwedenTerminatedMusculoskeletal Neck Pain | Musculoskeletal Shoulder PainSweden
-
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre ASHelse Sor-Ost; Sykehuset i Vestfold HFCompletedNeck Pain Musculoskeletal | Back Pain Lower BackNorway
-
Massachusetts General HospitalMcMaster UniversityRecruitingPain | Pilot Study | Opioid | Orthopaedic Related Pain (Musculoskeletal Pain)United States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillYale University; Duke University; National Institute on Aging (NIA); Indiana University and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Acute Musculoskeletal PainUnited States
-
University of Missouri, Kansas CityTerminatedOrthopaedic Related Pain (Musculoskeletal Pain)United States
-
Istanbul Aydın UniversityNot yet recruitingNeck Pain | Myofascial Pain Syndrome | Work-Related Musculoskeletal DisordersTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Wayne State UniversityUniversity of MichiganCompleted
-
Wayne State UniversityBlue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan FoundationCompleted