Exercise Training and Knee Joint Proprioception in Rheumatoid Arthritis

March 16, 2025 updated by: Aysima Barlak

The Effect of Exercise Training on Knee Joint Proprioception in Patients with Rheumatoid a Exercise Training on Knee Joint Proprioception in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritisrthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disorder that affects 0.5% to 1% of adults and is the result of an autoimmune attack against joint tissues. In recent years, advances in anti-rheumatoid drugs and treatment strategies have improved the health status of patients with RA. However, many patients do not achieve disease remission and experience progressive functional impairment. According to 2003 data from the National Health Interview Survey in the United States, by 2030, approximately 25% of adults aged 18 years and older are expected to have doctor-diagnosed arthritis, and 9.3% of adults are expected to have arthritis-related activity limitations.

In order for patients with RA to perform activities of daily living, it is very important for them to maintain their balance, i.e., their sense of proprioception. It is known that knee proprioception is decreased in RA. In addition, the presence of pain, decreased muscle strength, and functionality in patients with RA lead many of them to adopt a sedentary lifestyle.

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of exercise training on knee joint proprioception in individuals with RA. In addition, it also aims to examine how exercise training improves pain, functionality, performance, fear of falling, biopsychosocial status, and quality of life. The importance of this research is that it provides more scientific data for improving knee joint proprioception in individuals with RA and guides clinical practice. It is also expected to contribute to the development of a comprehensive approach to improving the quality of life of patients by demonstrating not only the physical but also the psychological and functional effects of exercise training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Altındağ
      • Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with RA
  • Being able to walk
  • Being between the ages of 40-65.
  • Accepting to participate in the study and approving the informed consent form.
  • Being literate and able to use technological devices.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having acute inflammatory pathology in the knee joint.
  • Knee arthroplasty surgery.
  • Intra-articular or systemic corticosteroid use in the last 3 months.
  • Having participated in an FTR program in the last 3 months.
  • Advanced musculoskeletal, cardiac or peripheral vascular disease.
  • Significant system or organ failure.
  • Having a disease that will affect cognitive functions such as Alzheimer's disease or dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training Group
The Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach (Bilişsel Egzersiz Terapi Yaklaşımı-BETY) is an innovative exercise approach developed based on the biopsychosocial model. The parameters that form the basis of BETY are function-oriented core stabilization exercises, information management in pain, information management in mood, and information management in sexuality. BETY was shaped by the feedback of individuals with rheumatism who participated in regular exercise sessions for years and was introduced to the literature as a treatment method aiming to create changes in the cognitive structures of patients through exercise.
No Intervention: Kontrol Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach (BETY)- Biopsychosocial Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 mounths
it is a 30-item Likert-type scale developed through repeated statistics of feedback from rheumatic individuals who have participated in exercise sessions for many years, expressing the healing characteristics. It evaluates the individual from a biopsychosocial perspective with the subheadings of pain, functionality-fatigue, mood, sociability, sexuality and sleep. It is scored between 0 and 120. BETY-BQ evaluates the individual from a holistic perspective with six subheadings: pain (5 items), functionality (9 items), mood (10 items), sociability (3 items), sexuality (2 items) and sleep (1 item). A high score indicates a low biopsychosocial status.
3 mounths

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proprioception of the knee joint
Time Frame: 3 mounths
Joint position sense was evaluated for proprioception measurement. All measurements were performed by a sports physician using a Biodex System III Isokinetic Dynamometer (Biodex Corp, Shirley, NY). For the reproduction test, which evaluates joint position sense, the passive method in the sitting position was used. The evaluation was performed for 30° and 60° knee flexion angles.
3 mounths
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: 3 mounths
It is a scale developed to question functional inadequacy in daily living activities. The scale questions a total of 8 activities, including dressing, sitting up, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching out, grasping and daily tasks, and consists of 20 questions. Each question is scored between 0 and 3. High scores indicate a decrease in the individual's functionality.
3 mounths
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 3 mounths
It is a scale consisting of 14 questions (7 questions about depression, 7 questions about anxiety) that the individual is asked to answer by thinking about the last few days, and is scored between 0 and 3. The cut-off values of the scale are 10 for the anxiety subscale and 7 for the depression subscale. High total scores indicate high levels of anxiety or depression
3 mounths
WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: 3 mounths
WOMAC assesses pain, endurance and physical functioning, functional status and stiffness. This scale has gained increasing acceptance in the assessment of OA since its introduction in 1986. The pain subscale includes five items asking about pain with activity, at rest and at night. The stiffness heading includes two questions. The functional status heading includes an assessment of difficulty in 17 different activities. The items are scored from 0 to 4 according to difficulty and the degree of pain and stiffness felt, with a higher total score indicating greater severity of the disease.
3 mounths
McGill pain scale short form (SF McGill)
Time Frame: 3 mounths
The form consists of three parts. In the first part, 11 of the 15 descriptive word groups evaluate the sensory and 4 evaluate the perceptual dimension of pain. These descriptive words are rated on an intensity scale from 0 to 3 (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Very). In the first part of the scale, a total of 3 pain scores are obtained: sensory pain score, perceptual pain score and total pain score. The second part of the form includes five word groups ranging from "mild pain" to "unbearable pain" to determine the severity of the patient's pain. In the third part, the patient's current pain intensity is assessed using a visual analogy scale (VAS).
3 mounths
Time Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 3 mounths
It is a test that evaluates fall risk and mobility in the elderly. With this test, the time (sec.) for individuals to get up from a chair, walk a distance of 3 meters and sit back on the chair was measured. A trial test was performed once. Then the test was performed twice and the average of the two measurements was taken.
3 mounths
10-step stair climbing test
Time Frame: 3 mounths

10-step stair climbing test:It is a test that evaluates the individual's stair climbing activity, lower extremity strength and dynamic balance.

On a staircase with a railing, the 9th step is marked and the individual is asked to climb up and down as fast as he/she can and this time (sec) is measured with a stopwatch.

3 mounths
6 min walk test
Time Frame: 3 mounths
This is a submaximal exercise test used to determine exercise capacity.
3 mounths
Fall efficacy scale
Time Frame: 3 mounths
Developed in 1990 by Tinetti et al., it assesses a person's perception of stability and fear of falling during daily activities indoors. It consists of 10 items, answers are scored between 1 and 10. A score above 70 indicates fear of falling
3 mounths
World health organization quality of life scale-short form (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 3 mounths
Developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the scale has two versions: long (WHOQOL-100) and short (WHOQOL-BREF). The WHOQOL-BREF scale consists of a total of 26 questions, 24 of which question perceived quality of life and 2 of which question perceived health status. It consists of 4 domains: physical, psychological, social relations and environmental domains. Since each domain independently expresses the quality of life in its own domain, domain scores are calculated between 4 and 20. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
3 mounths

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatic Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe