Dynamic Gait Index as a Functional Gait Assessment Measure in Children With JIA

June 1, 2026 updated by: Gokce Leblebici, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Investigation of Validity and Reliability of Dynamic Walking Index in Childhood Rheumatic Diseases

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common chronic rheumatic diseases seen in childhood. Pain, joint swelling and loss of function caused by inflammation significantly reduce the patients' quality of life and lead to muscle weakness, limited range of motion and gait disorders. Although there are various clinical assessment methods, there is no functional test in the current literature that evaluates walking in children with JIA.

The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a functional walking scale that evaluates walking on level ground, walking while changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking by jumping over obstacles, going around obstacles and climbing stairs. While the DGA is widely used in the clinical assessment of walking in older adults and other pediatric patient groups, it has not yet been investigated for the assessment of walking difficulties in children with JIA. This study aimed to determine whether the DYI is a usable tool for assessing walking in children with JIA.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Study Group;
  • Having a JIA diagnosis according to ILAR criteria between the ages of 8-16,
  • Having unilateral knee joint involvement that will affect walking
  • Being compatible, volunteer and cooperative in the study Control Group;

    1. Not having any neurological or orthopedic diagnosis
    2. Being between the ages of 8-16
    3. Being at a mental level that can understand the commands of the person performing the evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study Group;
  • Having an additional neurological or orthopedic diagnosis accompanying JIA and affecting treatment results,
  • Having lower extremity asymmetry or active lower extremity involvement other than the knee joint that will affect walking.

Control Group;

-Having any health problem that may affect the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient group
This group will be created with children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
The physical examination will included Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Walking speed, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, Pediatric balance scale and CHAQ (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire).
The DGI, whose validity and reliability will be investigated, consists of 8 items: walking on level ground, walking with changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking over obstacles, going around obstacles, and climbing stairs. Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal walking ability without a walking aid). The total score is 24. Scores below 19 indicate a risk of falling, while scores above 22 define safe ambulation.
Healthy control group
This group will be created with age matched healthy volunteers.
The DGI, whose validity and reliability will be investigated, consists of 8 items: walking on level ground, walking with changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking over obstacles, going around obstacles, and climbing stairs. Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal walking ability without a walking aid). The total score is 24. Scores below 19 indicate a risk of falling, while scores above 22 define safe ambulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dynamic Gait Index
Time Frame: Baseline and after 2 weeks from the baseline evaluation
The DGI consists of 8 items: walking on level ground, walking with changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking over obstacles, going around obstacles, and climbing stairs. Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal ability to walk without a walking aid). The total score is 24. Scores below 19 indicate a risk of falling, while scores above 22 describe safe ambulation.
Baseline and after 2 weeks from the baseline evaluation
Walking speed
Time Frame: Baseline
For the walking speed assessment, participants will be asked to walk along a 10-meter walkway at their preferred speed. Before the test, participants will be asked to walk 5 laps on the walkway and will be allowed to get used to the environment. During the walk, a video recording will be made in order to calculate the walking speed. For each participant, a video recording will be made with a camera fixed on a tripod placed laterally. During the walk, the participant's walking speed will be evaluated with the Kinovea 2D motion analysis program (Kinovea 0.8.15., GPLv2 license, 2019). Participants will be asked to walk 7 laps along the walkway, and the average data of these laps and the time taken to walk the 10-meter walkway in each lap will be recorded.
Baseline
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: Baseline
The TUG test measures the time it takes for a person to get up from an arm-supported chair, walk 3 m, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person walks at the preferred speed in their usual shoes with or without a walking aid. The tester remains with the participants at all times to ensure safety. Before starting the movement, the movement is demonstrated and explained to the child. The time it takes to get up from the chair and sit back in it is recorded. The test is repeated twice and the fastest score is recorded. Times less than 10 seconds are considered normal, while times greater than 14 seconds are recorded as a high risk of falling.
Baseline
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale is a pain rating scale used to show children their pain intensity levels. On this scale, a person who feels happy indicates that they feel no pain (no pain), while a person who feels sad indicates that they feel a little or a lot of pain, Face 0 is very happy because they feel no pain. Face 10 visually represents severe pain that leads to crying. Participants will be asked to choose the face that best describes their pain from the scale before and after taping to assess pain.
Baseline
Pediatric Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
To detect balance loss in children, the Pediatric Balance Scale, which is a modified version of the Berg balance scale and is used to assess functional balance skills in school-aged children, will be applied. The scale consists of 14 items, scored from 0 (lowest function) to 4 (highest function), with a maximum score of 56. The Pediatric Balance Scale is designed for use in school-aged children with mild to moderate motor impairments. Pilot testing was conducted on children aged 5 to 15 years.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Childhood Health Assessment Questionnarie
Time Frame: Baseline
The questionnaire consists of two different sections, the disability index and the discomfort index. The disability index consists of 8 parameters including dressing and personal care, standing up, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching out, holding and activities. All of these areas were assessed in 3 components. 1) How much difficulty they had in performing which daily functions 2) Whether they used special devices for daily functions 3) Whether they needed help from someone else in these activities were asked from each patient. There are 4 different possibilities for answers: 0 = no difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with great difficulty, 3 = unable. Discomfort was assessed by measuring pain with a 15 cm visual analog scale. The parents of the patients were asked to rate how much pain their child had in the past week and to give a score between 0 and 100. Similarly, they are asked to score between 0 and 100 on how much they have been affected by the disease since its onset
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Physical examination

Subscribe