DV 100 as a Framework for the Hospital Incident Command System (OrAKEL)

July 10, 2025 updated by: Maik von der Forst, University Hospital Heidelberg

The Service Regulation DV 100 as an Organizational Structure for Establishing the Hospital Incident Command System

There is limited scientific research on the organizational structure of the Hospital Incident Command System. The Hospital Alarm and Emergency Planning manual by the German Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance (BBK) recommends a continental staff system-based organization, as outlined in the Service Regulation DV 100, similar to military, fire, and police structures. This approach is frequently discussed at professional conferences, but evidence on its functionality in hospitals is lacking. This study aims to generate new insights into the use of a continental staff system-based Hospital Incident Command System and qualitatively analyze transition and communication processes within the command structure.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population comprises all Heidelberg University Hospital staff potentially involved in the hospital incident command system

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in at least one hospital incident command system (ICS) training and, if applicable, in a ICS exercise.

Written informed consent from the employee for participation in the second part of the study (semi-structured interview)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decline of study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
University Hospital Heidelberg staff eligible for deployment in the hospital incident command system
Only adult employees capable of giving informed consent are included. The study population comprises all University Hospital Heidelberg staff potentially involved in the hospital incident command system.
This is an observational study with no interventions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploration of leadership communication and dynamics during the transition from routine clinical operations to an emergency situation
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessment of training and exercise effects within a structured (according to DV-100) hospital incident command system, including challenges, resistance, benefits, subjective participant experiences, potential improvements, and alternatives
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examination of the applicability of the traditional incident command concept in hospitals, considering a workforce largely inexperienced in continental staff system-based work.
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Evaluation of participants' operational confidence
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Analysis of communication behaviors within the command functions
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of a structured hospital incident command system
Time Frame: During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.
Assessed through semi-structured interviews based on Grounded Theory, a systematic method for developing theories through the analysis of qualitative data
During the table-top exercise on May 26 and May 27, 2025.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 29, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe