Virtual Reality Adjunct for Procedural Pain and Anxiety Management in Burn Wound Care (VR-Burn)

March 30, 2025 updated by: Al Hayah University In Cairo

Efficacy of Virtual Reality as an Adjunct for Procedural Pain and Anxiety Management in Burn Wound Care: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy of immersive virtual reality (VR) as an adjunct to standard analgesia during dressing changes in adult burn patients. The study compares an intervention group receiving standard care combined with an immersive VR distraction (using a head-mounted display displaying an engaging virtual environment) versus a control group receiving standard care plus non-VR distraction (watching a nature video on a tablet). The primary outcomes include procedural pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and anxiety levels measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction and physiological parameters (heart rate and blood pressure) recorded during the procedure. This trial addresses the critical gap of heterogeneity and small sample sizes noted in previous VR studies for burn care pain management (Dascal et al., 2017).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Procedural pain during dressing changes for burn wound care remains a substantial clinical challenge affecting both patient comfort and treatment compliance. Immersive VR technology has been suggested as an effective distraction technique, potentially reducing pain and associated anxiety by providing a highly engaging alternative sensory input. However, previous studies have been limited by variable protocols and modest sample sizes.

In this single-center RCT, adult burn patients aged 18-65 years with partial-thickness burns scheduled for routine dressing changes will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either:

Intervention Group: Standard care (analgesia as per institutional protocol) plus immersive VR distraction (using a commercially available head-mounted display with interactive virtual environments) Control Group: Standard care plus non-VR distraction, operationalized as watching a nature video on a tablet device.

Randomization will be computer generated.

Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measures are procedural pain intensity (assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale immediately post-procedure) and anxiety (assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory immediately post-procedure). Secondary endpoints include patient-reported satisfaction with the distraction modality and objective physiological parameters (heart rate and blood pressure) monitored throughout the procedure.

Data will be collected at each dressing change session over the study period, and repeated measures analysis will be applied to assess between-group differences.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12111
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Al Hayah University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult burn patients (18-65 years) with confirmed partial-thickness burns. Scheduled for routine dressing changes. Able to provide informed consent. Baseline pain score of ≥4/10 during a dressing change session.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with cognitive impairment preventing comprehension of the intervention.

History of severe motion sickness or visual impairments that preclude the use of VR devices.

Patients with contraindications to standard analgesic care.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR Distraction
Participants in this arm will receive standard analgesic care according to institutional protocols plus an immersive virtual reality (VR) distraction intervention. During each burn dressing change, participants will wear a head-mounted display delivering an interactive, engaging virtual environment specifically designed for distraction. This arm aims to assess the efficacy of VR in reducing procedural pain intensity and anxiety compared to the control condition.

Intervention Description:

Participants assigned to this intervention will receive standard analgesic care per institutional protocol in addition to an immersive virtual reality (VR) distraction intervention. During each burn dressing change, participants will wear a head-mounted display (HMD) that delivers an interactive and engaging virtual environment designed specifically to distract from procedural pain and reduce anxiety. The VR session will last for the entire duration of the dressing change (approximately 10-15 minutes) and will be administered during every session. The VR system is calibrated to provide high levels of sensory immersion to effectively divert attention from painful stimuli.

Active Comparator: Nature Video Distraction
Participants in this arm will receive the same standard analgesic care as the experimental group and will be provided with a non-VR distraction intervention. They will watch a nature video displayed on a tablet device during each burn dressing change session. This comparator is designed to control for the effects of distraction, allowing assessment of whether immersive VR provides additional benefit beyond conventional video distraction.

Intervention Description:

Participants in this intervention will receive the same standard analgesic care provided to all subjects and, in addition, will watch a nature video on a tablet device during the burn dressing change. The video distraction serves as an active comparator to the immersive VR. The nature video is selected to be calming and engaging, and it will be played continuously during the dressing change session (approximately 10-15 minutes). This intervention allows evaluation of whether immersive VR provides additional benefit in reducing procedural pain and anxiety over a standard video distraction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Status via Burn Specific Health Scale - Brief (BSHS-B)
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and at follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.
The Burn Specific Health Scale - Brief (BSHS-B) is a validated questionnaire designed to assess physical, psychosocial, and functional outcomes in burn survivors. It evaluates domains such as physical functioning, pain, emotional health, and social reintegration. Changes in functional status over time will help determine the impact of the burn injury and the effect of the intervention on recovery.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and at follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Return-to-Work Rate
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months post-discharge.
This outcome measure evaluates the proportion of participants who have successfully returned to work at 12 months post-discharge. Return-to-work status will be verified by self-report and cross-referenced with available medical and employment records, serving as an indicator of long-term functional recovery and social reintegration.
Assessed at 12 months post-discharge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (QoL) via SF-36 Health Survey
Time Frame: Evaluations will occur at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.
The SF-36 Health Survey is a comprehensive, validated instrument designed to measure quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, and mental health. This will provide insight into the broader impact of burn injuries and recovery over time.
Evaluations will occur at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.
Range of Motion (ROM) Measurements
Time Frame: Measurements will be recorded at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Range of motion (ROM) in the affected areas will be assessed using standardized goniometry. This measurement quantifies physical mobility and joint function, providing objective data on the physical recovery and potential functional limitations post-burn injury.
Measurements will be recorded at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Psychological Well-Being via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: HADS assessments will be administered at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a validated self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms. Improving psychological well-being is a key aspect of overall recovery for burn survivors.
HADS assessments will be administered at baseline (within 2 weeks post-discharge) and then at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VRBURN2025-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on Immersive Virtual Reality Distraction (IVRD)

Subscribe