Low-Level Laser Therapy vs. Saline for Wound Healing After Primary Molar Extraction.

April 2, 2025 updated by: Hadeer Mostafa Kamel Sallem, Cairo University

Effect Of Low-Level Laser Therapy Versus Saline On Wound Healing Of Primary Molars Extraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

To evaluate the effect of low level laser therapy versus the saline on wound healing after extraction of primary Molars

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ● Children aged from 4 to 6 years.

    • Children of both genders.
    • Medically fit ASA I.
    • Children with badly decayed primary molars beyond repair and indicated for extraction.
    • Parents acceptance to participate in the study.
    • Cooperative children.
    • Antibiotics and painkillers have been stopped at least 12 hours prior to the procedure.(Özer et al., 2024)
    • Teeth with at least two-thirds of the root.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● Uncooperative children.

    • Lack of informed consent by the child patient's parent to be approved ethically.
    • Unable to attend follow-up visits to avoid attrition bias by decreasing the number of drop off cases.
    • Medical history includes conditions such as prolonged bleeding, platelet disorders, hypersensitivity, allergic reactions to pain relievers, contraindications to laser therapy, and acute pain.
    • Teeth with root lengths less than two-third of the normal root length or those who experienced extensive iatrogenic trauma during tooth extraction.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-level laser therapy
Effect of Low-level laser therapy in wound healing after primary molar extraction
Effect of Low-level laser therapy in wound healing after primary molar extraction
Active Comparator: Saline
Normal saline in wound healing after primary molar extraction
Following the extraction, a piece of gauze soaked in normal saline solution (NSS) will be placed over the socket. Both parents and children will be instructed to keep the gauze in place for 45 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of granulation tissue
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days and 7 days after extraction
binary outcome will be recorded by clinical examination as presence or absence of granulation tissue using Landry, Turnbull, Howley Index
Follow-up day of, 3 days and 7 days after extraction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of tissue color
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Binary (>50% gingiva red, >25% but < 50%gingiva red, <25% gingiva red, All tissue pink) will be recorded by Clinical examination using Landry, Turnbull, and Howley Index
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Rate of bleeding on palpation
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Presence of suppuration
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Clinical examination using Landry, Turnbull, and Howley Index. Unit of measurement is binary (present /absent)
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Assessment of gingival margin status
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Size of wound
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Rate of post operative pain
Time Frame: Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction
Score (0-10) will be recorded by Wong-Baker Pain Scale
Follow-up day of, 3 days, and 7 days after extraction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

April 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LLLT25

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound-healing

Clinical Trials on Low-level laser

Subscribe