Evaluation of the WARIFA App and Its Impact on Healthy Lifestyle

Effect of the WARIFA App on User-defined Objectives, Healthy Lifestyles and Management of Type 1 Diabetes: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to assess the effect of the WARIFA app on the adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviours related to Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), as well as in the management of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). This is done using user-generated data analysis, artificial intelligence (AI) and risk estimation to provide personalised recommendations on lifestyle-related behaviours through a mobile app.

  • Primary objective: the objective of this study is to assess the impact of using the WARIFA app on a series of outcomes, related to the promotion of healthy lifestyles and prevention of NCDs, as well as on the management of T1D.
  • Secondary objectives: to assess the feasibility of implementation of a complex health app (WARIFA), and to explore which outcomes are more relevant in this context for users.

The study will evaluate the app in two different populations:

  • Population 1: Citizens living in Europe of either sex aged > 18 years diagnosed with no more than one NCD (of the following: CVD, any type of cancer, chronic respiratory disease and T2D) and current owners of a smartphone with internet access.
  • Population 2: European adult individuals of either sex aged >18 years with T1D currently using multiple daily insulin injections or an insulin pump and current owners of a smartphone with internet access.

The study will be carried out in three centres in three different countries: the Instituto Universitario de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias (iUIBS) in Spain, the Norwegian Centre for E-health Research (NSE) in Norway, and in Romania.

Participants in each population will be randomised to an intervention or control arm on a 1:1 ratio:

  • Intervention arm: the Warifa app will be used by the participants throughout the study. The app will provide personalised risk estimations and recommendations through user-generated data analysis and artificial intelligence.
  • Control arm: The control group will use a Warifa app with the same functionalities than the intervention arm, but without artificial intelligence.

At baseline, information will be collected by questionnaires and a physical examination, including anthropometry and a lipid profile. These measurements will be repeated in 12 weeks and will be compared between the treatment arms.

The study will last 3 months in total, start of recruitment on 10 February 2025, end of study after the last visit of the last participant, on 12 May 2025. Each user will participate in the study for 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Las Palmas
      • Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 35016
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto Universitario De Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias (IUIBS)
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ana Wägner, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Juan Carmelo Betancort Acosta, MD
        • Contact:
          • María Luisa Álvarez Malé, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Garlene Zamora Zamorano
        • Contact:
          • Kristina Reyes Suárez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Common for both population groups:
  • Adults over 18 years of age.
  • Owners of a smartphone operating with Android and with internet access.
  • Group 1: General population:
  • Healthy or diagnosed with no more than one NCD (CVD, any type of cancer, T2D or chronic respiratory disease).
  • Group 2: T1D:
  • Treatment with multiple subcutaneous insulin injections or an insulin pump.
  • Users of a continuous glucose monitor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Common for both groups:
  • Pregnancy.
  • Mobile device which is incompatible with the WARIFA app (E.g. Apple devices).
  • Unable to understand any of the app languages (Spanish, English, Norwegian or Romanian).
  • Any reason which precludes follow-up, based on the researcher's criteria.
  • Group 1: General population
  • People with two or more NCDs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Use of WARIFA app with artificial intelligence (AI)
Participants will use a version of WARIFA app with artificial intelligence and personalized messages.

Participants will be given access to the WARIFA app on their mobile phones during the study.

This app will collect activity data as well as questionnaires and diaries. Using this data and artificial intelligence, it will provide participants with personalised information and recommendations about their lifestyle and risk of chronic non-communicable diseases.

Placebo Comparator: Use of WARIFA app without artificial intelligence (AI)
Participants will use a version of WARIFA app with the same functionalities as the intervention group, but without artificial intelligence and personalized messages.

Participants will be given access to the WARIFA app on their cell phones during the study.

This app will collect activity data, as well as through questionnaires and diaries. With this data, it will give information and general recommendations to the participants related to their lifestyle habits and risks of chronic non-communicable diseases, following the WHO guidelines. This version will not use artificial intelligence or personalized messages.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-defined goal by the participants
Time Frame: At the end of intervention at 12 weeks

Degree of achievement of a self-defined goal by the participants (selected among: increase consumption on fruit and vegetables, increase physical activity, reduce alcohol consumption, stop smoking, reduce number of weekly hypoglycaemic episodes, or improve sun protective behaviours).

It will be measured on a Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 ('well below expectations') to 10 ('well above expectations').

At the end of intervention at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of app use
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Number of times users access the app (number of times per day). Direct adherence.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Time spent using the app
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Time spent using the app (number of hours per day). Direct adherence.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Consistency in data recording
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Assessment of the regularity with which users record information related to healthy habits, healthy eating and physical activity. Direct adherence.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
ABACUS scale
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
The validated App Behaviour Change Scale (ABACUS). Attitudinal/Behavioural Change. The ABACUS scale was designed to measure the potential behavior change of apps. It consists of 21 items grouped into 4 categories: knowledge and information (5 items), goals and planning (3 items), feedback and monitoring (7 items), and actions (6 items). Each item represents a behavior change technique, and its inclusion in the app is rated dichotomously (behavior change technique not included = 0 or included = 1). Higher score means more potential behavioural change of apps.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Changes in eating habits
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Assessment of changes in diet quality (changes in consumption of fruits, vegetables, processed foods…). Diary recording of fruit, vegetable, and processed meat consumption will be used. Attitudinal/Behavioural Change.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Changes in physical activity
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Data collected through a compatible smartwatch (number of steps) will be recorded. Attitudinal/Behavioural Change.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Reduction in tobacco consumption
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Diary records of tobacco consumption will be used (number of cigarettes per day). Attitudinal/Behavioural Change.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Reduction in alcohol consumption
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Diary records of alcohol consumption will be used (Number of units of alcoholic beverages per day). Attitudinal/Behavioural Change.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Changes in sun protection behaviour
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
sun habits questionnaire score wil be used. Attitudinal/Behavioural Change
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Changes in sun protection behaviour
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Daily record of sunscreen use. Attitudinal/Behavioural Change
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Hypoglycaemic events
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
The continuous glucose monitor data from participants will be used (number of hypoglycaemic events). Biomedical outcomes
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Hypoglycaemic events
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Diary records of manually recorded hypoglycaemic events (number of hypoglycaemic events). Biomedical outcomes.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Glycosylated haemoglobin
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Will be measured in venous blood. Unit of measurement: %. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Glucose Management Indicator
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Glucose Management Indicator in the last 14 days. Unit of measurement: %. Biomedical outcome
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Average glucose
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Average glucose in the last 14 days. Unit of measurement: mg/dl. Biomedical outcomes.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Time in ranges
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Times in glucose range for the last 14 days, measured by the participants' glucose sensor. Unit of measurement: %. Biomedical outcomes.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Total cholesterol
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Total cholesterol, measured through a venous blood sample. Unit of measurement: mg/dl. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
HDL cholesterol
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
HDL cholesterol, measured through a venous blood sample. Unit of measurement: mg/dl. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
LDL cholesterol
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
LDL cholesterol, measured through a venous blood sample. Unit of measurement: mg/dl. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Non-HDL cholesterol
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Non-HDL cholesterol, measured through a venous blood sample. Unit of measurement: mg/dl. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Muscle mass.
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Muscle mass. Measured by impedanciometry. Unit of measurement: Kg. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Fat mass
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Fat mass. Measured by impedanciometry. Unit of measurement: Kg. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Weight
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Weight of each participant. Unit of measurement: Kg. Biomedical outcomes
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Height
Time Frame: At the enrollment
Height of each participant. Unit of measurement: cm. Biomedical outcomes
At the enrollment
Circumference of abdomen.
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Circumference of abdomen. Unit of measurement: cm. Biomedical outcomes
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Circumference of the calf
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Circumference of the calf. Unit of measurement: cm. Biomedical outcomes
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Dynamometry
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Functional test, using a dynamometer in each participant's hand. Unit of measurement: Kg. Biomedical outcomes
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Body fat.
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Measured by plicometer in the posterior region of the upper arm (triceps area). Unit of measurement: mm. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Chair test 5 repetitions
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Functional test, which measures the time taken to stand up and sit down from a chair 5 times. Unit of measurement: seconds. Biomedical outcomes.
At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Perceived quality of life
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

The EQ-5D questionnaire will be used for the group from the general population. Quality of Life and Wellbeing. Questionnaire with two distinct parts. The first part contains five health dimensions (mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). For each dimension of the EQ-5D, severity levels are coded: 1 if the answer choice is 'no (I have) problems'; 2 if the answer choice is 'some or moderate problems'; and 3 if the answer choice is 'many problems'. The higher the score, the worse the health dimension.

The second part of the EQ-5D is a scale from 0 to 100. On this scale, the individual should mark the point that best reflects their assessment of their overall health status, with 0 being the lowest assessment of their health status and 100 being the best.

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Perceived quality of life
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

The "Vida con Diabetes tipo 1" (ViDa1) questionnaire will be used for the group of individuals with T1D. Quality of Life and Wellbeing.

The ViDa1 has 34 items that are grouped into 4 different dimensions: interference with life, self-care, well-being and worry about the disease. It is a questionnaire that can be self-administered with a Likert-type response format in which a total score per subscale is obtained.

Interference with life: (items 1 - 12), self-care (13 - 23), well-being (24 - 29) and worry about illness (30 - 34). Each item is scored from 1 'strongly disagree' to 5 'strongly agree'. For correction, the scores obtained in each subscale are added together. Items 12, 23 and 27 are reversed for correct interpretation.

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Acquired knowledge
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

Assessment of new knowledge about healthy habits. The European Health Literacy Survey will be used. Knowledge and Attitudes.

The questionnaire consists of 16 questions that classify the degree of difficulty perceived by the participant in each task or situation as: 1 'very easy', 2 'easy', 3 "difficult", 4 'very difficult' or 5 'don't know/no answer'.

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

For measuring diabetes self-management behaviours, we will use the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA). Knowledge and Attitudes.

Is a brief self-report questionnaire of diabetes self-management that includes items assessing the following aspects of the diabetes regimen. It consists of 11 items that addresses different areas of self-care present in people with Diabetes Mellitus, such as diet, physical activity, medication, self-testing of capillary glycaemia and smoking. It presents a response scale from 0 to 7, depending on the number of days that the person has carried out a certain behaviour in the last week. The smoking item has a dichotomous response scale.

The lower the score, the lower the adherence of the person with MD to favourable self-care behaviours. The questionnaire has no cut-off point, so each item must be assessed individually.

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Usability
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

Usability scale (SUS) will be used. Satisfaction and feedback.

The SUS scale is a 10-item questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). It is arranged to alternate between positive and negative statements to avoid habitual bias from the respondent. The score contribution for the odd items (the positive statements) is the scale position minus 1 and the contribution for the even items (the negative statements) is 5 minus the scale position. The overall score is calculated from the sum of all item scores multiplied by 2.5, with the overall score ranging from 0 to 100. A system with a score above 85 is considered to have excellent usability, whereas a system with a score between 68 and 84 is considered to have good usability.

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks
Usability
Time Frame: At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) will be used. Satisfaction and feedback.

It assesses the ease of use, interface, satisfaction and usefulness of mHealth applications for end users. Consists of 18 items, with 7 response options for each item, ranging from 1 "strongly disagree" to 7 "strongly agree".

At the enrollment and the end of intervention at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 29, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study will be conducted in three European countries, in compliance with both national and European data protection laws.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle Intervention

Clinical Trials on WARIFA app with AI

Subscribe