After-school Game-Based Physical Activity Program Improves Physical Fitness of 9-10-Year-Old Children (AGPAP)

April 7, 2025 updated by: Elvin Onarici Gungor

A 12-week Afterschool Game-Based Physical Activity Program Improves Physical Fitness of 9-10-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study investigates the effect of an afterschool game-based physical activity program (AGPAP) on children's PF. This study was randomized controlled trial involving 120 children from a state school in Eskisehir/Turkey. The CONSORT checklist was used in this study. The sample of 9-10 years children (n = 120) was divided into groups by randomization. The intervention consisted of AGPAP. For PF, handgrip strength, curl-ups, sit-and-reach, standing long jump, and 10-meter running speed tests were applied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Eski̇şehi̇r
      • Odunpazari, Eski̇şehi̇r, Turkey, 26160
        • Eskisehir Tecnical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. being 9-10-year-old,
  2. volunteering,
  3. permission from the child's parents,
  4. not having any amputations or permanent disabilities in their bodies,
  5. not having chronic or acute diseases,
  6. not using a support device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. any discomfort during measurements,
  2. the child does not want to participate in the measurement,
  3. the child does not participate in the practices due to any disability or discomfort,
  4. not reaching 80% participation in the program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
EG additionally participated in AGPAP (4:00 pm-5:00 pm) twice a week, every Wednesday and Friday, for a total of 60 minutes, for 12 weeks. AGPAP started the week after the pre-tests for EG. The intervention program consisted of 24 traditional street games, including running, hopping, galloping, leaping, jumping, sliding, striking, catching, ball catching, overhand throwing, balance, one-hand throwing, flexibility, coordination, shooting at the target, and hand-arm-leg strength and both outdoor and indoor facilities were utilized based on whether conditions. Each practice phase is 60 minutes long and includes three stages: instruction and warm-up (10 min.), AGPAP practice (45 min.), and cooling-down (5 min.). Two researchers who hold graduate degrees in physical education and sport led AGPAP and recorded children's participation. At the end of the intervention, the same testing procedures and testing materials were used for post-test measurements.
EG participated in AGPAP (4:00 pm-5:00 pm) twice a week, every Wednesday and Friday, for a total of 60 minutes, for 12 weeks. EG and CG did not participate in any additional physical activity programs after-school.
No Intervention: Control
Measurements were applied to the CG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Body weights were measured using a digital scale (SECA, Hamburg) with an accuracy of 0.1 kg while subjects were wearing as light clothing as possible and barefoot. Heights were measured using a portable stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg) with an accuracy of 0.1 cm while subjects were barefoot, with their feet together and their heads on a horizontal plane 47. The weight(kg)/height2(m) formula was used to calculate BMI.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Handgrip strength test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The hand grip strength test measures the explosive power of the upper body using an adjustable and calibrated hand dynamometer (Takei, Tokyo, Japan). Participants were asked to hold them in their right and left hands and squeeze it slowly and continuously until they reached the max. for at least 2 s. The best of 2 repetitions was recorded as the test score in kg.
12 weeks
Standing long jump test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Each participant attempted to jump as far as possible across a certain distance while standing, with their arms forward, their feet closed, and landing on the ground. The best of the 2 attempts was recorded in centimeters.
12 weeks
Curl-ups test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants were asked to lie with their arms crossed on their chest, their knees bent, and their feet flat on the floor. Afterward, they were asked to lift their upper bodies with their elbows facing forward, touch their knees, and then return to the lying position. The total number of complete curl-ups performed correctly in 30 seconds was recorded.
12 weeks
The sit and reach test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The sit and reach tests were applied using a specially constructed box that had a slide runner attached to the top. The accuracy of the instrument used was 0.1 cm, and the length it was able to measure was 80 cm (01285A, Lafayette, USA). Subjects sat on a flat surface with their back, shoulders, and the back of their head close to the wall for the sit-and-reach test. Their arms were straightened, their hands were placed on the tester board with palms facing down, and their legs were positioned straight. Each participant placed their hands side by side on the measurement starting line on the bench and gradually pushed the bar on the sit-and-reach bench forward to the furthest point they could while reaching with their hands without bending their knees. Each participant repeated the test two times, and the best of these two repetitions was taken into statistical evaluation.
12 weeks
10-meter running speed test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Photocells were placed at the beginning and end of the 10-meter track (Smart Speed, Fusion Sport, Brisbane, Australia). Participants waited in a standing starting position 50 cm behind the starting line and started sprinting upon receiving the command when they were ready. Two repetitions were conducted, and the best result was recorded at the end of the trials.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ELVİN ONARICI GÜNGÖR, dr, Eskisehir Tecnical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EskisehirTU-SBF-EOG-01
  • Eskisehir Technical University (Other Identifier: Education)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

only IPD used in the results publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2025-January 2026

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Subscribe