Motor Learning of Fall Resistant Skills Through Slip and Trip Exposure in Multiple Sclerosis (STRES-MS)

December 10, 2025 updated by: Feng Yang, PhD, Georgia State University
The primary purpose of this interventional study is to examine the overall motor learning capacity from exposure to repeated perturbations among ambulatory people with multiple sclerosis (MS). This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Falls present a significant health risk for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Perturbation training has emerged as a promising strategy to prevent falls. This type of training, which is based on sensorimotor adaptation and motor learning, capitalizes on the central nervous system's (CNS) ability to develop new motor skills. With repeated exposure to large-scale slip or trip perturbations, participants can quickly learn how to better respond to falls. The primary benefits of this training include improved dynamic stability control, both proactively and reactively, by adjusting the body's center of mass (COM) relative to its base of support (BOS).

Sixty-four individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A (training) and Group B (control). Both groups will first participate in an acquisition session. Group A will undergo a training procedure blending slips, trips, and unperturbed walking on a treadmill. In contrast, Group B will walk on the treadmill for the same duration without any perturbations. Immediately following the acquisition session, both groups will experience an unexpected slip and trip while walking over ground (with the order of the slip and trip randomized). Three and six months later, both groups will complete two retention sessions. Each retention session will involve experiencing a treadmill slip and trip (treadmill reslip and retrip) and an overground slip and trip (overground reslip and retrip), with the order randomized. Responses to these perturbations will be measured using the outcomes of fall or non-fall, dynamic stability, leg muscle reaction times, and recovery step length. Additionally, real-life prospective falls and near falls will be monitored for both groups over the six months following the acquisition session.

This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Feng Yang, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 404-413-8357
  • Email: fyang@gsu.edu

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • Recruiting
        • Georgia State University Biomechanics Lab
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically confirmed multiple sclerosis
  2. At least 45 years old
  3. Able to walk independently at least 25 feet
  4. Able to stand independently for at least 30 seconds
  5. Patient Determined Disability Steps score between 0 and 4
  6. Free from pregnancy
  7. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 23 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous experience with perturbation training
  2. T-score from the dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of less than -2.5
  3. Coexisting psychiatric disorders or other neurological conditions, severe medical illness, or cardiovascular diseases
  4. Participants have had a relapse in the past 8 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training Group
During the acquisition session, this group will undergo perturbation training on the treadmill while wearing a safety harness. Then, they will experience an unexpected slip and trip while wearing a safety harness and walking overground. During the 3-month and 6-month retention sessions, they will experience a slip and trip during treadmill walking and a slip and trip during overground walking.
Unexpected slips blended with trips and unperturbed walking trials on a treadmill. A safety harness will be worn at all times.
Active Comparator: Control Group
During the acquisition session, this group will walk on the treadmill without perturbations for the same amount of time as the training group. Then, they will experience an unexpected slip and trip while wearing a safety harness and walking overground. During the 3-month and 6-month retention sessions, they will experience a slip and trip during treadmill walking and a slip and trip during overground walking.
Treadmill walking for the same amount of time as the training group without perturbation. A safety harness will be worn at all times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perturbation Outcome (Fall or Non-Fall) on the Treadmill or Overground
Time Frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
A loadcell will be connected to the safety harness (above the participant's head) and will measure the force exerted on the safety harness during each perturbation trial. Perturbation outcomes will be classified as falls if the peak loadcell force exceeds 30% of the body weight. Otherwise, perturbation outcomes will be classified as non-falls.
Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dynamic Gait Stability as defined by the Feasible Stability Region (FSR) Theory
Time Frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
FSR-based dynamic gait stability considers both the center of mass position and velocity during the slip or trip recovery process. Dynamic stability will be calculated at the foot touchdown before and after the perturbation onset. For slip-falls (or trip-falls), the larger (or smaller) the stability value, the more stable one is in resisting slip-related backward (or trip-induced forward) falling.
Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Leg Muscle Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
The reaction times will be determined as the duration from the perturbation onset to the instant when the respective muscle is activated.
Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Recovery Step Length
Time Frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Recovery step length will be calculated as the distance between the heels at recovery foot touchdown and normalized to body height.
Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.
Prospective Real-Life Falls and Near Falls
Time Frame: 6 month period after the acquisition session
Both groups will report their fall or near-fall incidents through an online survey weekly.
6 month period after the acquisition session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis (Relapsing Remitting)

Clinical Trials on Perturbation Training

Subscribe