Combined Effects of Dual-task and Perturbation Based Training on Balance and Cognition in Stroke Patients

December 29, 2025 updated by: Foundation University Islamabad
This study aims to evaluate the Combined Effects of Dual-task and Perturbation Baesd Training on Balance and Cognition in Stroke Patients. Stroke is an acute cerebrovascular disorder that can impair cognitive, motor, and balanace abilites. Stroke is the second largest cause of death and disability globally. According tp studies, people who have had a stroke are more likely to fall than others who are same age and gender. PBBT is known as artificially induced balance training technique that can mimics the loss of balance that can occur naturally in freal life. Reduction in falls has been reported broadly by the use of perturbation based balance training. Current study will be and RCT on 33 participants based on the inclusion critieria. Participants will be randomly and equally divided into two groups; group B receiving Perturbation Based Training Alone and Group A receiving Dual-task and Perturbation Based Balance Training. The treatment will be given for 40 minutes, 3 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks. The assessment will be conducted at baseline, for cognition by Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), for initial treadmill speed 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT), for balance by Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and for fall riak by Fall Efficacy Scale (FES). Final assessment will be conducted after 6 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is a multifaceted disease that can be caused by a variety of risk factors, disease processes and causes. Stroke results in the change of cognitive function, which effects resulting in minor impairment to the development of post-stroke dementia. The cognitive deficiencies in a stroke survivors have significant influence on their daily productivity. In addition, falls are a prevalent and potentially fatal issue for as many as 47% of all stroke patients admitted to the hospital.Some studies suggest that Dual-task training when paired with mechanical action of treadmill could maximize the constraint on the cognitive control processes for gait.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No limitation of genders.
  • Age between 25-80 years
  • Participants diagnosed with chronic stroke
  • Participants being able to walk with or without walking aid independently or under supervision
  • Participants with impaired balance as indicated by a score of <=41 on BBS
  • Participants with Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score <26

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with sinificant co morbidties or secondary complications including orthopedic or rheumatological disorders were excluded
  • Patients with severe cognitive impairment or dementia
  • Apraxia or hemi-neglect
  • Participants with body weight >100kg
  • Participants with significant visual or hearing impairments
  • Patients with epilepsy or pacemaker
  • Participants with peripheral or central neuropathies that could impair balance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dual-task and Perturbation Based Training
  1. Participants in the experimental group received combined perturbation and dual task training
  2. The intervention was conducted for 3 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks
  3. Each treatment session lasted approximately 40 minutes including 5 minute of warmup and 2 minutes of rest between 2 segments
  4. Primary training modality was treadmill
  5. Initial walking speed was determined individually for each participant by using 10MWT
  6. Perturbations were applied manually during treadmill walking
  7. The intensity of treadmill was progressively increased across sessions by change in directions of perturbations, unpredictability, walking speed and reducing hand support when safe
  8. Dual-task training is added after 3 session and will be performed concurrently with perturbation training.
  9. Cognitive tasks include counting backwards, naming animals, subtracting 3 from 100.
  10. The complexity of the task will progressively increased
  11. Safety should be ensured by using the harness

The intervention program spans six weeks and involves both supervised Perturbation sessions and Dual-Task training exercises. Participants will attend three supervised Perturbation based training per week, with each session consisting of two 8-minute segments of the training.

In addition, participants will perform Dual-Task training and perturbations on treadmill, with each cycle consisting of two segments. This combination of supervised practice will be increased progressively throughout all six weeks. Across the entire program, participants will complete a total of 18 supervised perturbation based balance training and 18 Dual-task training sessions.

Active Comparator: Perturbation Based Training
  1. Participants in control group received Perturbation Baesd Training Alone
  2. The intervention was conducted for 3 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks
  3. Each treatment session lasted 40 minutes including 5 minute of warm up and 2 minute of rest between segments
  4. Primary training modality was treadmill
  5. Initial walking speed was determined individually for each participant by using 10MWT
  6. Perturbations were appllied manually during treadmill walking
  7. The intensity of treadmill was progressively increased across sessions by chanfe in directions of perturbations, unpredictability, walking speed and reducing hand support when safe
  8. Safety should be ensured by using the harness, keeping emergency stop at reach, and use of handrails when necessary
The control group will participate in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of the Perturbation Based Balance Training. Participants will attend three supervised sessions per week, ensuring consistent oversight and proper technique throughout the program. Each session will began with a warm-up period, followed by two 8-minute segments of perturbation-based treadmill training, with participants allowed a rest period of 60 second to 2 minute between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. The frequency is maintained consistently, however, perturbations dosage was progressively increased across all six weeks to provide a standardized exposure, allowing for accurate comparison with other intervention groups. Over the entire six-week period, participants will complete a total of 18 supervised sessions, each with three repetitions, summing up to 108 bouts across the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Balance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used, Maximum Total=56 points (41-56=Low fall risk, 21-40= Medium fall risk, 0-20 High fall risk)
6 weeks
Cognition
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, Maximum score=30 (26-30= normal cognition, 18-25= mild cognitive impairment, 10-17 moderate cognitive Impairment, <10=severe cognitive impairment
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fall Risk
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Fall Efficacy Scale (FES), Total score=10-100 (higher score = greater fear of falling
6 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Perturbation + Dual-Task Training

Subscribe