Progressive Resistance Training for Adults With External Snapping Hip (Snappy Hip)

July 4, 2025 updated by: Aarhus University Hospital

Snappy Hip Trial: A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Progressive Resistance Training Compared to Usual Care on Pain for Adults With External Snapping Hip

External snapping hip is characterised by an audible and painful snap during hip movement among physical active people around 15-40 years old. Progressive resistance training has been suggested as a new potential treatment path in treating patients with external snapping hip. The investigators conducted a feasibility study and found that patients reported less pain and improved their physical function, quality of life and muscle strength after 12 weeks of progressive resistance training. The overall aim of the project is to compare hip pain in patients with external snapping hip treated with progressive resistance training to a wait-and-see approach, in a randomised controlled trial. This study has the potential to establish a new and specific treatment option for patients with external snapping hip, to be used nationally and internationally.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This trial is an international multicentre randomised controlled assessor-blinded crossover trial, following the CONSORT guidelines. The intervention is a 12-week progressive resistance training programme, and the trial is designed with three follow-up time points. After the baseline test, the patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or the control group using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) source hosted at Aarhus University. For both groups, the first test will be the baseline test, conducted before the randomisation. The second test will be conducted 6 weeks after randomisation, the third test will be conducted 12 weeks after randomisation and the fourth and last test will be conducted 24 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline to the third follow-up, and the trial will be powered based on this period. The lasting effect of the intervention will be evaluated from baseline to the fourth follow-up test for the intervention group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Aalborg Universitetshospital
        • Contact:
          • Jens Kristinsson
          • Phone Number: 004597660000
          • Email: hjk@rn.dk
      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa U Tønning, MHSc
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2400
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
      • Herning, Denmark, 7400
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Regionshospitalet Gødstrup
        • Contact:
          • Christina F Frandsen
          • Phone Number: 004578430000
          • Email: chrifroe@rm.dk
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nordsjællands Hospital - Hillerød
        • Contact:
      • Horsens, Denmark, 8700
        • Recruiting
        • Regionshospitalet Horsens
        • Contact:
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hvidovre Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Køge, Denmark, 4600
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sjællands Universitetshospital - Køge
        • Contact:
      • Næstved, Denmark, 4700
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Næstved, Slagelse og Ringsted Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
      • Randers, Denmark, 8930
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Regionshospitalet Randers
        • Contact:
          • Daniel Wæver
          • Phone Number: 004578420000
          • Email: DANWAE@rm.dk
      • Vejle, Denmark, 7100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 18-40 years (10)
  • Experienced lateral hip joint "snapping" with pain discomfort within the last 14 days
  • Able to demonstrate the audible and/or visible lateral "snapping" during lateral hip joint movementor popping sound when the hip joint moves
  • Capable of commuting to the training facility
  • Proficient in reading and understanding Danish or English

Exclusion criteria:

  • Previous surgery on the affected hip
  • Planned surgery on lower extremities within the trial period
  • Anterior or medial hip discomfort that substantially exceeds the lateral hip discomfort
  • Any contraindication to exercise
  • Neurological, rheumatoid, or mental conditions affecting the hip function
  • Ongoing active cancer treatment
  • Planned vacation for more than 14 days within the intervention period
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group: Wait and see approach
The control group are randomized to 12 weeks of waiting time followed by 12 weeks of progressive resistance training.
The progressive resistance program consist of a five-minute aerobic warm-up on either an ergometer bike, treadmill or rowing machine followed by six resistance training exercises: landmine twist, walking lunges, leg press, hip abduction, hip adduction and hip flexion. All training sessions (three per week) will be supervised for the first two weeks. After that, there will be one weekly supervised training session and two self-directed sessions. The subjects will be scheduled for 36 training sessions over 12 weeks, of which 16 will be supervised. Each training session is designed based on the findings from the feasibility study and is expected to last approximately one hour. If a subject cannot perform all scheduled sessions in a week, additional sessions will be planned for the following week to obtain the 16 supervised sessions.
Other Names:
  • Exercise therapy
12 weeks of waiting time
Other Names:
  • Waitlist
  • Wait
Experimental: Intervention group: progressive resistance training
The intervention group are randomized to 12 weeks of progressive resistance training followed by 12 weeks of self guided exercise
The progressive resistance program consist of a five-minute aerobic warm-up on either an ergometer bike, treadmill or rowing machine followed by six resistance training exercises: landmine twist, walking lunges, leg press, hip abduction, hip adduction and hip flexion. All training sessions (three per week) will be supervised for the first two weeks. After that, there will be one weekly supervised training session and two self-directed sessions. The subjects will be scheduled for 36 training sessions over 12 weeks, of which 16 will be supervised. Each training session is designed based on the findings from the feasibility study and is expected to last approximately one hour. If a subject cannot perform all scheduled sessions in a week, additional sessions will be planned for the following week to obtain the 16 supervised sessions.
Other Names:
  • Exercise therapy
12 weeks of self guided exercise
Other Names:
  • Wait
  • Self training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HAGOS Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12 and week 24
The HAGOS is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of six different subscales. The pain subscale consists of 10 questions, which are all answered using standardised answer options following a 0-4-point Likert Scale. The scores are transformed into a subscale score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A minimal clinically relevant difference of the HAGOS pain subscale has been reported to be 9.7 points among a group of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.
Baseline, week 6, week 12 and week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UCLA-AS
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The patient-reported questionnaire: the University of California Los Angeles Activity Scale. There is only one question with 10 answers, ranging from 1 (worst) to 10 (best).
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
GPE
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The patient-reported questionnaire: the Global Perceived Effect, where the participant answers four questions about the effect of the treatment received. Each question has 7 possible answers, ranging from 1 (best) to 7 (worst).
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Single leg hop test
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The objective measures include the single-leg hop for a distance test to test hip function. The hop distance is measured in cm.
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
30 second unilateral sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The unilateral 30 second Sit to Stand test (unilateral 30STS) is a clinical test of lower extremity function. The unilateral 30STS tests how many correct repetitions of a sit to stand from a chair, a participant can complete in 30 seconds.
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Number of training sessions the participant participated in
Time Frame: Throughout the study, summed in week 24
Adherence to the exercise protocol will be evaluated based on information from the physiotherapists and a self-reported training diary. Good adherence will be defined as participation in more than ≥70% of all training sessions (both supervised and self-training).
Throughout the study, summed in week 24
Adverse events
Time Frame: Throughout the study, summed in week 24
The physiotherapist will record any adverse events occurring during the study period.
Throughout the study, summed in week 24
HAGOS
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12 and week 24
The remaining five subscales of HAGOS: symptoms, function in daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation (Sports/Rec), participation in physical activities (PA) and hip and/or groin-related quality of life (QOL). The scores are transformed into a subscale score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Baseline, week 6, week 12 and week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The patient-reported questionnaire: the European Quality of life 5 Dimensions with 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) where the participant answers six questions in relation to health-related quality of life
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
iPCQ
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The patient-reported questionnaire: the Productivity Costs Questionnaire, where information on productivity is collected .
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
HUQ
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Health Utilisation Questionnaire (HUQ) where information on healthcare and medicine is collected.
Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Usage of analgesics due to hip-related pain
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
The participants will be asked if they take any analgesics due to hip-related pain. If yes, they will be further asked what type of medicine (Paracetamol/NSAID/Morfin/Other) and how often (Never/Monthly/Weekly/Daily).
Baseline, week 12 and week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stig S Jakobsen, PhD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, DK
  • Principal Investigator: Lisa U Tønning, MHSc, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, DK
  • Study Director: Inger Mechlenburg, DMSc, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK
  • Study Director: Ulrik Dalgas, PhD, Department of Public Health, Sports, Aarhus University, DK
  • Study Director: Troels Kjeldsen, PhD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, DK
  • Study Director: Cara Lewis, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Boston University, Boston, US
  • Study Director: Martin Lamm, MSc, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, DK
  • Study Director: Joanne L Kemp, PhD, La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Snappy Hip Tirial
  • 4308-00012B (Other Grant/Funding Number: Independent Research Fund Denmark)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized patient-level data will be made available if required by the scientific journal, in which the results of the trial are published. Additionally, researchers presenting a justified cause for receiving the data can obtain it after a data access agreement has been signed.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after publication of the trial upon reasonably request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Applications for data access will be reviewed by the author group. The applicant will be required to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coxa Saltans External

Clinical Trials on Progressive resistance training

Subscribe