CsA vs MMC for Preventing Pterygium Recurrence (MMC)

April 17, 2025 updated by: Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad, Benha University

Adjunctive Use of Topical Cyclosporin A Versus Mitomycin C to Prevent Pterygium Recurrence

aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporin A (CsA) versus mitomycin C (MMC) as adjunctive therapies in preventing pterygium recurrence after surgical excision.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 40 eyes from 40 patients undergoing pterygium surgery were randomized into two groups: Group A received topical cyclosporin A, while Group B was treated with topical mitomycin C. Ocular surface inflammation scores, recurrence rates, patient-reported symptoms, and adverse effects were assessed at baseline and during follow-up at 6 months postoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 4450113
        • Ebsar Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosed with primary pterygium extending at least 1 mm onto the cornea.
  • No prior history of pterygium surgery in the affected eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular surface diseases such as dry eye or Sjögren's syndrome.
  • Active ocular infection.
  • Known hypersensitivity to CsA or MMC.
  • Systemic conditions requiring immunosuppressive therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (CsA Group)
Patients received topical cyclosporin A (0.05%) twice daily for three months postoperatively.
The surgical procedure involved excision of the pterygium, including the fibrovascular head and associated conjunctival tissue, followed by bare sclera closure using an autologous conjunctival graft harvested from the superior bulbar conjunctiva. The graft was secured in place using either fibrin glue or 8-0 absorbable sutures. In Group B, 0.02% mitomycin C (MMC) was applied to the bare sclera for two minutes using a soaked sponge, followed by thorough irrigation with balanced salt solution.
Patients received topical cyclosporin A (0.05%) twice daily for three months postoperatively.
Active Comparator: Group B (MMC Group)
Patients received a single intraoperative application of mitomycin C (0.02%) for two minutes during surgery
The surgical procedure involved excision of the pterygium, including the fibrovascular head and associated conjunctival tissue, followed by bare sclera closure using an autologous conjunctival graft harvested from the superior bulbar conjunctiva. The graft was secured in place using either fibrin glue or 8-0 absorbable sutures. In Group B, 0.02% mitomycin C (MMC) was applied to the bare sclera for two minutes using a soaked sponge, followed by thorough irrigation with balanced salt solution.
0.02% mitomycin C (MMC) was applied to the bare sclera for two minutes using a soaked sponge, followed by thorough irrigation with balanced salt solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence rate of pterygium
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
the recurrence rate of pterygium, defined as fibrovascular regrowth over the cornea of at least 1 mm
6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in parameter OSDI (ocular surface disease index) from 0 to 100 points.
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
OSDI (from 0 to 100 points) where patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time" a final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores and based on their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) ocular surface disease.
6 months after surgery
Change in clinical parameter Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
The Schirmer test score is determined by measuring the length of the strips' moistened area against fluid movement
6 months after surgery
Change in clinical parameter (TBUT)
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
Change in clinical parameter Tear breakup time (TBUT) from less than 5 to more than 10 seconds
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ehab Saad, Lecturer, Benha University, Ebsar Eye Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CsA vs MMC for pterygium
  • Benha University (Other Identifier: Al-Azhar University)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pterygium

Clinical Trials on Excision of the pterygium

Subscribe