Effects Of Posterior Oblique Sling Strengthening on Temporo-Spatial Gait Parameters in Young Adults

April 17, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of posterior oblique sling strengthening on gait parameters (speed, stride length, and cadence), gluteus maximus strength, latissimus dorsi flexibility, and trunk rotation in young adults. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Riphah Internal university, Rawal General & Dental Hospital and Rawal Institute of Rehabilitation & Health Sciences. Recruiting 48 participants aged 18-30 years with unilateral or bilateral posterior oblique sling tightness. Participants will be randomly assigned into two groups through the sealed envelope method. The intervention will be performed four times per week for three weeks, followed by a home-based program from weeks 4 to 6. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-1st session, weekly during intervention, and at week 6. Tools used include Inclinometer (for lumbar range of motion), Goniometer (to assess latissimus dorsi length), Waistband Pedometer (to measure gait parameters such as cadence, walking speed, and stride length), Hand-held Dynamometer (to assess gluteus maximus strength), Inches Tape (for Pectoralis Minor Length Test to evaluate muscle flexibility and scapular positioning) and demographic measures..

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The posterior oblique sling, consisting of the latissimus dorsi, gluteus maximus, and thoracolumbar fascia, is vital for lumbar-pelvic stability and efficient force transmission during movement. The gluteus maximus plays a key role in transferring force from the lower limb to the pelvis, stabilizing the lumbar region. Tightness in the POS can restrict hip extension by limiting the flexibility of the gluteus maximus and hamstrings, affecting gait efficiency and coordination. Increased gait speed improves arm swing, coordination, and trunk rotation, while limited arm swing reduces gait efficiency. Prolonged sitting in younger adults (ages 20-30) can tighten the POS, weakening the posterior chain and raising back pain risk. Targeted stability exercises are key to prevention.

Disruptions in the posterior oblique sling, such as gluteus maximus weakness or thoracolumbar fascia tightness, can lead to compensatory latissimus dorsi overactivation, reduced lumbar mobility, and altered scapular motion, worsening chronic low back pain. Enhanced arm swing improves coordination, gait speed, and stride length, highlighting upper body influence on lower body movement.

Intervention for posterior oblique sling tightness focuses on improving mobility and lumbar-pelvic control through a combination of techniques. Muscle Energy Techniques are applied to the latissimus dorsi and gluteus maximus to release tension and enhance flexibility. Dynamic stretching and myofascial release are incorporated to further improve muscle mobility and fascia flexibility. Functional exercises, such as resisted trunk rotation, engage the POS to enhance stability and coordination. Additionally, exercises like the abdominal drawing-in maneuver combined with prone hip extension target core strength and lumbar control, while the Prone Hip Extension with 125° of left shoulder abduction supports improved trunk and gait stability, addressing the interconnectedness of the posterior chain.

Collectively, these findings underscore the importance of addressing muscle imbalances in the POS through targeted strengthening exercises and gait training, which are essential for improving dynamic stability, alleviating CLBP symptoms, and restoring functional movement. Sedentary behaviors in young adults contribute significantly to posterior oblique sling (POS) dysfunction, manifesting as tightness and weakness in key muscle groups, which adversely affects gait mechanics, musculoskeletal health, and overall quality of life. The POS, comprising the gluteus maximus, latissimus dorsi, and thoracolumbar fascia, plays a critical role in trunk rotation, dynamic stability, and efficient gait patterns. Despite its importance, there is a noticeable gap in specialized interventions targeting POS dysfunction, leaving many young adults at risk of poor mobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and long-term health complications

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Capital
      • Islamabad, Capital, Pakistan, 45550
        • Rawal Institute of Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (RIRH) & Rawal General & Dental Hospital. (RG&DH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-30 years.
  • Both Genders: Male and Female.
  • Participants either unilateral or bilateral POS tightness.
  • Participants had latissimus dorsi tightness indicates:
  • Modified rotation test (10-degree rotation difference than contralateral side)
  • Participants had gluteal maximus weakness indicates:
  • Prone hip extension test (unable to lift leg more than 15 degrees or do compensatory mechanism)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have pectoralis minor tightness indicates:
  • Pectoralis Minor Length Test (assessing the ability to flatten the posterior shoulder with posterior force applied in a supine position distance greater than 2.6 cm (1 inch) by inches tape indicate Pectoralis Minor tightness).
  • Diagnosed Lumbar spondylosis.
  • Diagnosed disc prolapse.
  • Diagnosed neurological deficits.
  • Diagnosed cerebellar or vestibular lesions impacting balance and gait.
  • The presence of knee, ankle, or hip pathologies that impair lower limb function.
  • Spine surgery within the past 12 months
  • Unable to understand and follow the commands

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A Myofascial technique
Group A follows a six-week, five-day-per-week protocol (30-40 min) targeting posterior oblique sling activation.

Group A with MET (latissimus dorsi), myofascial release (thoracolumbar fascia) and posterior oblique sling strengthening it will be a six-week protocol, with sessions conducted five times a week for 30-40 minutes, focusing on posterior oblique sling activation. Week 1: Myofascial release (thoracolumbar fascia, 60-90 sec), MET (latissimus dorsi, 7-10 sec isometric + 30-sec stretch, 5 reps), glute max strengthening (prone hip extensions, 10-sec holds ×5; bilateral bridges, 5-sec holds ×5).

Week 2: Prone hip extension (3-kg resistance), arm extension (1-kg dumbbell, 5-sec holds ×5), bird-dog (5-sec holds ×10, 1 set).

Weeks 3-4: Prone hip extensions (5-sec holds ×10), single-leg bridges (5-sec holds ×10), twice daily.

Weeks 5-6: Increased intensity to 10-sec holds ×10 reps

Experimental: group B (posterior oblique sling strengthening protocol)
A six-week conservative protocol, conducted five times per week for 30-40 minutes, focusing on core stability exercises.
A six-week conservative protocol, was conducted five times weekly for 30-40 minutes, focuses on core stability exercises. Week 1 includes static stretching of the latissimus dorsi (30-second hold, 3 reps) and prone hip extensions with knee flexed at 90° (5-second hold, 10 reps). By Week 2, bird-dog exercises are introduced (5-second hold, 10 reps per side). In Weeks 3-6, these exercises are maintained to provide a stable baseline for comparison with Group A's more intensive protocol. The latissimus dorsi stretch is performed 2-3 times daily for improved flexibility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hand-held dynamometer for gluteal maximus strength:
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The hand-held dynamometer is used to assess gluteus maximus strength by measuring the force exerted during hip extension. The patient is positioned in the prone position with the knee flexed at 90°, and the dynamometer is placed just above the knee on the posterior side of the leg. The patient then extends the hip against the resistance provided by the dynamometer, with measurements recorded in kilograms or pounds. The test is repeated 2-3 times to ensure consistency, with adequate rest between repetitions.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Waist band Pedometer:
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The waistband pedometer is used to measure gait parameters the pedometer records the total steps taken over a set time, which is divided by time to calculate steps per minute.
Baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Goniometer ( Latissimus Dorsi length)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
To assess Latissimus Dorsi length in the supine position, the patient lies with their knees bent and feet flat on the table to maintain a neutral lumbar spine. The clinician stabilizes the pelvis to prevent compensatory movement while the patient extends both arms overhead to assess shoulder flexion. A goniometer is used to measure the angle of shoulder flexion, with the stationary arm aligned with the lateral aspect of the trunk and the moving arm aligned with the humerus. The test is performed on both sides, and the maximum range of shoulder flexion is recorded.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inches Tape (for Pectoralis Minor length Test)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The Pectoralis Minor Length Test is a clinical assessment used to evaluate the length and flexibility of the pectoralis minor muscle, which plays a crucial role in scapular positioning and shoulder function. In this test, the patient lies supine on a flat surface, and a posterior force is applied to the coracoid process to assess the ability of the pectoralis minor to allow for full shoulder extension. The patient's arm is positioned at 90° shoulder abduction and external rotation to evaluate the scapula's ability to flatten against the surface. The distance from the acromion to the table is measured using an inches tape to assess the flexibility of the pectoralis minor.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar flexion
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar extension
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar right lateral flexion
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae, both with and without radiologic control. The procedure involved assessing lumbar right lateral flexion with interrater reliability evaluated by a physiotherapist.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar left lateral flexion
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar right rotation
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae.
Baseline to 6 weeks
Inclinometer for lumbar left rotation
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks
The lumbar range of motion was measured using an inclinometer placed at the T12 and S1 vertebrae.
Baseline to 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aisha Razzaq, PHD*, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Tightness

Clinical Trials on Group A myofascial technique

Subscribe