- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06948500
Effectiveness of an IVR-based Therapeutic Exercise Program With Altered Visual Feedback in Fibromyalgia Patients (IVR-F)
Effectiveness of an Immersive Virtual Reality-based Therapeutic Exercise Program With Altered Visual Feedback in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: JUAN FRANCISCO LISÓN PÁRRAGA, PhD
- Phone Number: 64540 606503108
- Email: JUANFRAN@UCHCEU.ES
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Juan J Amer, PhD
- Phone Number: 64642 96136900
- Email: juanjoamer@uchceu.es
Study Locations
-
-
Valencia-valència
-
Valencia, Valencia-valència, Spain, 46006
- Recruiting
- Juan Fco. Lisón
-
Contact:
- JUAN JOSÉ AMER-CUENCA, PhD
- Phone Number: 64642 961369000
- Email: juanjoamer@uchceu.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to any of the classification criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), including those from 1990, 2010, 2011, or 2016;
- Ability to communicate effectively with the research staff;
- A self-reported pain intensity score of ≥3 on a 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of comorbidities and/or symptoms that constitute a contraindication for immersive virtual reality or exercise-based interventions;
- Presence of medical conditions that may interfere with study outcomes, such as visual, auditory, perceptual, or sensory disorders;
- Use of medications that could potentially affect study results;
- Engagement in another therapeutic physical activity program during the intervention period, or any modifications to existing therapies (including medication or physical therapy) throughout the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Immersive Virtual Reality + Physical Activity
A set of ten therapeutic exercises using IVR will be implemented.
These exercises are designed to enhance strength, stability, mobility, and flexibility in the abdomino-lumbo-pelvic region and lower limbs.
During each exercise, participants will wear IVR goggles that modify visual proprioceptive feedback by altering the perceived range of movement.
Specifically, the visual input provided by the IVR system will create a discrepancy between actual physical movement and perceived motion, allowing participants to visually experience movements differently from reality.
|
Participants will undertake a 6-week therapeutic exercise program, consisting of two sessions per week (12 sessions total), with a primary objective of reducing fibromyalgia's impact on daily life.
Each session will involve ten exercises performed in one or two sets each, depending on the week of the protocol.
Exercise repetitions and intensity will be individualized using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (6-20), maintaining an intensity range of RPE 13-17.
Specifically, intensity will start at RPE 14 (moderate) in Weeks 1-2, increase to RPE 15 (moderate-high) in Weeks 3-4, and peak at RPE 16 (high) in Weeks 5-6.
No external load will be applied during the first three weeks to allow participants to adapt to the program, while progressive resistance will be introduced during the final three weeks according to individual capacity, ensuring a safe and gradual overload.
Participants will wear an HTC Vive Pro head-mounted display with waist, hand and foot trackers during 60-min sessions, 2 times/week for 6 weeks (12 sessions). A gender- and skin-tone-matched first-person avatar will be calibrated to the user's anthropometrics and will mirror all real-time movements. Standardised audio instructions will be played through the headset; a virtual mirror will provide visual feedback. To facilitate lumbar mobility, two sensorimotor illusions will be applied: (1) Flexion illusion: Avatar upper-limb length will be reduced by ≈20%, encouraging greater trunk flexion; (2) Extension illusion: A virtual bar will rise with lumbar extension but will under-represent real movement by ≈10%. Both manipulations will update continuously throughout each repetition. A physiotherapist will supervise every session and will record adverse events. |
|
Active Comparator: Physical Activity
Control-group participants will perform the same 6-week therapeutic-exercise program as the experimental group; the only difference will be the absence of the IVR.
Training methodology, load progression, assessment procedures, and physiotherapist supervision will remain identical, ensuring comparability between groups.
|
Participants will undertake a 6-week therapeutic exercise program, consisting of two sessions per week (12 sessions total), with a primary objective of reducing fibromyalgia's impact on daily life.
Each session will involve ten exercises performed in one or two sets each, depending on the week of the protocol.
Exercise repetitions and intensity will be individualized using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (6-20), maintaining an intensity range of RPE 13-17.
Specifically, intensity will start at RPE 14 (moderate) in Weeks 1-2, increase to RPE 15 (moderate-high) in Weeks 3-4, and peak at RPE 16 (high) in Weeks 5-6.
No external load will be applied during the first three weeks to allow participants to adapt to the program, while progressive resistance will be introduced during the final three weeks according to individual capacity, ensuring a safe and gradual overload.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fibromyalgia Impact
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured with Spanish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR).
This 21-item instrument evaluates physical function (0-30), overall impact (0-20), and symptom severity (0-50), yielding a total score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
|
At six weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fatigue
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Fatigue will be assessed using the Spanish version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), a validated 20-item self-report instrument measuring five dimensions: general and physical fatigue, reduced activity and motivation, and mental fatigue.
Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding total scores from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Sleep quality
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured using the validated Spanish version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19-item self-report measure evaluating sleep over the past month across seven components.
Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured using the Spanish EQ-5D-5L, a validated self-reported tool measuring five dimensions on five severity levels.
Responses yield an index score (-0.5 to 1.0), with lower values indicating worse health, calculated using the Spanish value set.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed using the Spanish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item self-report tool comprising two subscales, HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression, each scored 0-21.
Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), with higher scores indicating greater severity.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured using the Spanish version of the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), which evaluates the frequency of catastrophic thoughts and feelings related to pain across three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
Items are rated from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-52, where higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Fear-avoidance beliefs
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed using the Spanish version of the 16-item Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), scored on a 7-point Likert scale (0-6), where higher scores indicate stronger avoidance beliefs.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Pain distribution
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed with the Widespread Pain Index (WPI; 0 - 19), the 19 item body map component of the 2016 ACR Fibromyalgia criteria.
Participants mark each anatomical region in which they have experienced pain during the previous week; the total score corresponds to the number of painful sites, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 19 (pain in all sites), with higher scores indicating a wider pain distribution and greater disease burden.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Symptom severity
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured with the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS; 0 - 12), the second component of the 2016 ACR Fibromyalgia criteria.
Participants rate the severity of fatigue, non-restorative sleep, cognitive problems and extent of additional somatic symptoms on 0 to 3 Likert items (0 = none, 3 = severe).
Scores are summed to yield a total ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (maximal severity), with higher values reflecting a greater symptom severity.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Change in Fibromyalgia Survey Diagnostic Criteria (FSDC) total score
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
The FSDC total score will be calculated by summing the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) scores.
This yields an aggregate score ranging from 0 to 31, with higher values reflecting a greater overall fibromyalgia symptom burden.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed using the Spanish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), an 11-item self-report measure of fear of movement and reinjury.
Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1-4), with total scores ranging from 11 to 44.
Higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Central sensitization
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), a validated 25-item self-report measure assessing symptoms associated with central sensitization.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with scores of 40 or higher indicating the presence of a central sensitization syndrome.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed with a handheld digital algometer (Force One™, Wagner Instruments).
Measurements will be taken at two sites: (1) the dorsal surface of the right third finger, midway between the distal and middle interphalangeal joints; and (2) a point 5 cm lateral to the right of the spinous process of the third lumbar vertebra (L3).
A 1 cm² rubber tip will apply steadily increasing force until the participant first perceives pain; the force will be recorded in kilograms (kg).
Three trials will be performed at each site, with 30 seconds of rest between trials, and the mean of the three readings for each site will be used for analysis.
Lower pressure pain threshold (PPT) values (kg) indicate higher pain sensitivity.
Higher PPT values indicate lower pain sensitivity.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Temporal summation of pain
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured with a handheld digital algometer (Force One™, Wagner Instruments) applied to the dorsal surface of the right third finger.
Ten pressure pulses, each rising at 2 kg·s-¹ to the individual's mean pressure pain threshold, will be delivered at 1 Hz.
Participants will rate pain intensity on a 0-10 verbal Numeric Rating Scale after the first and tenth pulses.
The temporal summation (TS) score is calculated as NRS₁₀ - NRS₁ (range: -10 to +10), with positive values indicating temporal summation of pain, a marker of central sensitization.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Conditioned pain modulation
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed with a cuff-induced ischemic stimulus on the left upper arm.
The cuff is inflated at 20 mm Hg·s-¹ until the first pain sensation, held for 30 seconds, then adjusted to maintain a pain intensity of 3/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and kept inflated.
While the cuff remains on, a digital algometer delivers 10 pressure pulses to the dorsal surface of the right third finger: rising at 2 kg·s-¹ to the site-specific mean pressure pain threshold (PPT), held for 1 second, with 1 second of rest between pulses.
Pain intensity is rated (0-10 NRS) after the first and tenth pulses.
The conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effect is expressed as NRS₁₀ - NRS₁ (range -10 to +10).
Lower or more negative values denote weaker endogenous pain inhibition.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Lower limb strength and endurance
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed using the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (STS-30), a functional test that evaluates lower limb strength and endurance by measuring an individual's ability to repeatedly rise from a chair without upper limb support over a 30-second period.
The total number of repetitions performed during the 30-second period serves as an indicator of functional capacity, with higher scores reflecting better performance.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Functional mobility
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test, a widely used clinical tool that evaluates gait speed, dynamic balance, and overall functional capacity.
Participants are timed while rising from a chair, walking three meters, turning around, walking back, and sitting down.
Shorter times indicate better functional performance.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Isometric quadriceps strength
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured using a handheld dynamometer, a widely applied tool for quantifying neuromuscular function in individuals with fibromyalgia.
The portable device will be placed just above the ankle while the participant is seated with the knee flexed at 90°, in order to measure maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps muscle.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Measured with a Jamar hydraulic dynamometer, according to the protocol described by Hamilton et al.
Participants will sit with feet flat on the floor, shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed at 90°, and wrist and forearm in a neutral position.
Three maximal trials will be performed with verbal encouragement, with at least 4-minute rest intervals between attempts.
The average of the three trials will be used for analysis.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Behavioral regulations in exercise
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Motivational regulation was assessed using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3), a 24-item self-report instrument grounded in Self-Determination Theory.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = "not true for me" to 4 = "very true for me"), producing six subscale scores-Amotivation, External Regulation, Introjected Regulation, Identified Regulation, Integrated Regulation, and Intrinsic Regulation-each ranging from 0 to 16.
The total raw score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher values reflecting stronger endorsement of the statements.
Depending on the pattern of subscale scores, elevated Intrinsic and Integrated Regulation scores indicate more autonomous motivation, whereas higher External Regulation and Amotivation scores denote more controlled or amotivated regulation.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Dizziness provoked by immersive virtual-reality
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Dizziness will be monitored at every session using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "no dizziness" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable dizziness."
Dizziness will be captured as a continuous safety outcome, as it is expected to be the most frequent adverse effect of VR.
Documenting its intensity will allow for timely adjustments to the intervention protocol.
Higher scores will indicate greater levels of dizziness experienced during VR use.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Change in total physical activity (MET-minutes/week)
Time Frame: At six weeks
|
Total weekly physical activity will be estimated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF), a 7-item self-report tool validated in Spanish and recommended by the World Health Organization.
Participants report the frequency and duration of walking, moderate, and vigorous physical activities over the previous seven days.
Minutes of walking are weighted by 3.3 METs, moderate activity by 4.0 METs, and vigorous activity by 8.0 METs.
These values are summed to yield a total MET-minutes-per-week score.
The possible range is from 0 to no upper limit; higher values indicate greater energy expenditure.
|
At six weeks
|
|
Change in pain intensity from pre- to post-exercise session (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10)
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each exercise session over the 6-week intervention period (two sessions per week).
|
Pain intensity will be recorded immediately before and after each exercise session using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain").
Participants will be asked: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how intense is your pain right now?".
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
The outcome will be calculated as the within-session change in pain (post-exercise minus pre-exercise score).
|
Immediately before and after each exercise session over the 6-week intervention period (two sessions per week).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Juan F Lisón, PhD, Cardenal Herrera University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain
- Fibromyalgia
- Motor Activity
- Motor Activity
- Movement
- Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena
- Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena
- Exercise
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNIVERSITY CARDENAL HERRERA-80
- CEEI25/643 (Other Identifier: Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.