Optimization of the Isolation Protocol for Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) From Human Follicular Fluid

June 1, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vesicles found in all biological fluids, containing various regulatory molecules, including microRNAs (miRNAs). It has been suggested that the EVs in human follicular fluid (the fluid surrounding the oocyte within the ovary) play a crucial role in oocyte development through these miRNAs. However, several methods exist for isolating these EVs from follicular fluid. Before further research can be conducted on the pathophysiology and potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications of these EVs and their content, the optimal isolation technique must be determined for future studies.

Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the purity and efficiency may vary between species and different biological fluids. There are only a limited number of studies comparing the various techniques for application in human follicular fluid.

Objective: This study will compare the three most commonly used techniques for isolating EVs: size-based, sedimentation-based (differential ultracentrifugation), and buoyancy-based isolation techniques.

Methodology:

In this prospective study, follicular fluid will be collected from four patients undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval following ovarian stimulation at Ghent University Hospital. Patients over 40 years of age or with endometriosis, adenomyosis, or PCOS (polycystic ovarian syndrome) will not be included in this study. During the oocyte retrieval procedure, follicular fluid will be collected from 2-4 oocytes per patient. Since follicular fluid is not used in the patient's treatment (residual material), it does not affect the treatment.

After collection, the three isolation techniques will be applied to each sample. The techniques will be compared in terms of purity (absence of contamination) and efficiency (EV concentration) using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and western blotting.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients planned for an oocyte retrieval at Ghent University Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of endometriosis/adenomyosis
  • Diagnosis of PCOS (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome)
  • Macroscopic blood contamination at oocyte retrieval

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Differential ultracentrifugation
OptiPrep™ density gradient ultracentrifugation
Size-exclusion chromatography
Combined techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Purety
Time Frame: 3 months
Purety of EV isolation
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency
Time Frame: 3 months
Efficiency in terms of number of particles
3 months
RNA efficiency
Time Frame: 6 months
Efficiency in terms of RIN scoring
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extracellular Vesicles

Clinical Trials on Differential ultracentrifugation

Subscribe