- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06956781
Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) for Treating Pediatric Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (MOST for PTSD)
Optimizing Behavioral Health Services Following Pediatric Trauma Exposure
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the extent to which different treatment components work to improve pediatric post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It will also provide evidence for how these components work. The main research questions are:
What are the effects of different components used to treat PTSD? What do these components change to produce benefits in PTSD?
Researchers will:
Compare components to a psychological placebo to estimate their effects and measure how they work
Examine how components work alone and in conjunction with other components
Participants will:
Receive different combinations of components and placebo
Attend weekly treatment sessions
Provide information to evaluate changes in PTSD
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chad E Shenk, PhD
- Phone Number: (585) 275-8704
- Email: chad.shenk@rochester.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14608
- Recruiting
- The Mt. Hope Family Center
-
Contact:
- Haley Trehern, BS
- Phone Number: 585-481-7609
- Email: haley_trehern@urmc.rochester.edu
-
Contact:
- Chad Shenk, PhD
- Phone Number: 585-273-3264
- Email: chad.shenk@rochester.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Chad Shenk, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
A child between the ages of 8-17 exposed to at least one DSM-defined trauma
Child assent for participation
The participation of a caregiver with custodial rights to provide parental permission
Willing to participate in treatment delivery and respond to surveys
Meet PTSD diagnostic criteria that is the result of exposure to at least one of the identified traumas
Ability to read and understand English
Willingness to be randomized to an experimental condition
Placement in a stable caregiving environment for two months without an impending transition
Children currently taking psychotropic medications must have taken the medicine without dose adjustment for two months prior to study entry.
Caregiver or child with a smartphone capable of downloading a freely available software application.
Exclusion Criteria:
Psychiatric concerns requiring a higher level of care (e.g. suicidal ideation with intent; current psychotic disorder)
An intelligence quotient (IQ) < 70
Currently receiving a behavioral health intervention for concerns related to PTSD or pediatric trauma
A participating caregiver who is a perpetrator of any identified trauma (e.g. sexual abuse)
MRI contraindicators (e.g. presence of metal in the body)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 1
Participants receive emotion regulation, exposure, cognitive processing, and bi-lateral stimulation
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 2
Participants receive emotion regulation, exposure, cognitive processing, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 3
Participants receive emotion regulation, exposure, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 4
Participants receive emotion regulation, exposure, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 5
Participants receive emotion regulation, cognitive processing, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 6
Participants receive emotion regulation, cognitive processing, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 7
Participants receive emotion regulation, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 8
Participants receive emotion regulation and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn to reduce acute subjective distress, stabilize negative mood, promote positive mood, and alter physiological responses to trauma
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 9
Participants receive exposure, cognitive processing, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 10
Participants receive exposure, cognitive processing, and psychological placebo
|
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 11
Participants receive exposure, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 12
Participants receive exposure and psychological placebo
|
Participants engage in written exercises to reduce avoidance of trauma reminders and reinforce approach behaviors consistent with personal goals
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 13
Participants receive cognitive processing, bi-lateral stimulation, and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 14
Participants receive cognitive processing and psychological placebo
|
Participants learn ways to identify, challenge, and overcome the influence of cognitive distortions resulting from trauma exposure
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 15
Participants receive bi-lateral stimulation and psychological placebo
|
Participants engage in horizontal eye movements while recalling a traumatic memory and describing their affective and physiological state
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Condition 16
Participants receive psychological placebo
|
Participants receive non-directive support therapy, where they will guide the treatment session but not be required to discuss prior trauma exposure
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in PTSD Symptoms - Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 - Child/Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CAPS-CA is a clinician-administered diagnostic interview measuring the severity of PTSD symptoms in the past month.
The interview assesses 20 PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria with each symptom rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 4. Ratings for each individual symptom are summed with higher scores indicating greater severities of PTSD symptoms (total scores range from 0-80).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in PTSD Symptoms - Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CPSS is a child-report survey measuring the severity of PTSD symptoms in the past month.
Survey items assess 20 PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria with severity ratings for each item ranging from 0-4.
Ratings for each individual symptom are summed with higher scores indicating greater severities of PTSD symptoms (total scores range from 0-80).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in PTSD Symptoms - Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CATS-2 is a caregiver-reported survey measuring the frequency of pediatric PTSD symptoms in the past four weeks.
Survey items assess 20 PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic criteria with frequency ratings for each item ranging from 0-3.
Ratings for each individual item are summed with higher scores indicating greater frequencies of PTSD symptoms (total scores range from 0-60).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Number of Participants with a PTSD Diagnosis - The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 - Child / Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CAPS-CA is a clinician-administered interview establishing the presence of a PTSD diagnosis according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria.
The presence of a PTSD diagnosis (yes/no) will be established before and after receiving treatment.
Change in PTSD diagnostic status will be used to indicate treatment response.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Change in PTSD Symptom Trajectories - Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Weeks 1-18 (active treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CPSS is a child-report survey measuring the severity of PTSD symptoms that will be modified to assess these symptoms in the time since the last treatment session.
Survey items assess 20 PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria with severity ratings for each item ranging from 0-4.
Ratings for each individual symptom are summed with higher scores indicating greater severities of PTSD symptoms (total scores range from 0-80).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Weeks 1-18 (active treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Change in PTSD Symptom Trajectories - Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Weeks 1-18 (active treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CATS-2 is a caregiver-reported survey measuring the frequency of pediatric PTSD symptoms that will be modified to assess these symptoms in the time since the last treatment session.
Survey items assess 20 PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic criteria with frequency ratings for each item ranging from 0-3.
Ratings for each individual item are summed with higher scores indicating greater frequencies of PTSD symptoms (total scores range from 0-60).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Weeks 1-18 (active treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Mood Disorder Symptoms - Children's Depression Inventory-2 (CDI-2)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CDI-2 is a child-report survey assessing the severity of twenty-eight mood disorder symptoms in the past two weeks.
Responses are rated on a scale from 0-2 and summed.
Higher scores indicate greater severities of mood disorder symptoms (total raw scores range from 0-56).
Raw scores can be converted to T-scores.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety Disorder Symptoms - Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment, Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The SCARED is a child-report survey assessing symptoms of five pediatric anxiety disorders (panic/somatic, generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social phobia, and school phobia) in the past three months.
Responses assess the presence of 41 anxiety symptoms on a scale ranging from 0-2.
Item responses are summed with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms (total scores range from 0-82).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment, Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Disruptive Behavior Disorder Symptoms - Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CBCL is a caregiver-report survey measuring the frequency of child behavior problems in the past six months, including disruptive behavior disorder symptoms.
There are 112 items rated on a scale of 0-2 with individual item ratings summed to indicate greater symptom frequency (total scores range from 0-238).
Raw scores can be converted to T-scores.
The externalizing disorders broadband scale and the DSM-oriented scales will be used to measure disruptive behavior disorder symptoms.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Change in PTSD, Mood, Anxiety, and Disruptive Behavior Disorder Symptom Trajectories - Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
A 29-item, once-daily EMA will be administered to children via smartphone application for a period of two-weeks at pre-treatment, mid-treatment, and post-treatment.
Items assess the presence and duration of PTSD, mood, anxiety, and disruptive behavior disorder symptoms on a scale from 0-100.
Higher scores indicate a longer duration of symptoms experienced for the day the survey is completed.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Changes in Trajectories of C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The Tasso+ device will be used to obtain whole blood samples.
Tasso+ is an FDA 510(k)-approved, sterile, disposable blood lancing device approved for use by laypeople (e.g.
caregiver, research staff).
A sterile lancet punctures the skin with the press of a button that simultaneously creates a slight vacuum to help capillary blood flow into a compatible tube under gravity.
Depending on blood yield, CRP will be assayed.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Changes in Trajectories of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The Tasso+ device will be used to obtain whole blood samples.
Tasso+ is an FDA 510(k)-approved, sterile, disposable blood lancing device approved for use by laypeople (e.g.
caregiver, research staff).
A sterile lancet punctures the skin with the press of a button that simultaneously creates a slight vacuum to help capillary blood flow into a compatible tube under gravity.
Depending on blood yield, IL-6 will be assayed.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Changes in Trajectories of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The Tasso+ device will be used to obtain whole blood samples.
Tasso+ is an FDA 510(k)-approved, sterile, disposable blood lancing device approved for use by laypeople (e.g.
caregiver, research staff).
A sterile lancet punctures the skin with the press of a button that simultaneously creates a slight vacuum to help capillary blood flow into a compatible tube under gravity.
Depending on blood yield, tumor necrosis factor-alpha will be assayed.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Brain Aging - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
MRIs will be performed to measure changes in brain aging, the difference between a participant's chronological age and biological age estimated through several established neural markers.
Positive brain aging scores indicate faster brain aging.
Negative brain aging scores indicate slower brain aging.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Change in Neural Structure - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
MRIs will be performed to measure changes in neural structures (e.g.
hippocampal and amygdala volume) involved in memory retrieval as well as threat and fear processing associated with PTSD and treatment of PTSD.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Change in Network Connectivity - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
MRIs will be performed to measure changes in network connectivity (e.g.
default mode network) related to working memory performance, autobiographical recall, and fear processing.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), A randomly selected two-week period during active treatment (Weeks 5-18), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Experiential Avoidance - Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The AFQ-Y is a 17-item child report survey assessing experiential avoidance in the presence of aversive private stimuli.
Items are anchored on a 0-4 scale with responses summed to indicate greater levels of avoidance (total scores range from 0-68).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Trauma-Related Cognitions - Child Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The CPTCI is a 25-item measure assessing the presence of different cognitions that may occur following exposure to pediatric trauma.
Each item is ranked on a 1-4 scale with individual responses summed to indicate a greater number of trauma-related cognitions (total scores range from 25-100).
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change in Emotion Transitions - Affect Transition Task
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
Subjects rate the likelihood that a person would transition between two hypothetical affective states.
In each trial, subjects are presented with two states connected by an arrow (e.g.
happy - angry) and are informed that the state to the left of the arrow is the person's current state and the state on the right side of the arrow is a state the person might experience next.
The states included are: hate, love, happy, hurt, mad, sad, scared, and tired.
Subjects then rate the likelihood of that person making that transition on a continuous scale from 0-100% with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of that transition.
For a second set of tasks, subjects rate the similarity between each pair of states using a scale from 0-100% with higher ratings indicating greater similarity.
Variation in the likelihood ratings for each paired states are examined across participants.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change Subclinical Psychosis - Prodromal Questionnaire Brief Child Version Screener (PQ-BC)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The PQ-BC is a 21-item child-report survey assessing subclinical psychotic symptoms, including unusual beliefs and perceptual distortions in the past month.
Each item assesses the presence of a subclinical psychotic symptom in a yes/no response format.
A distress score, which weights the endorsed item by the level of distress experienced by that item on a scale of 0-6, is obtained for each of the 21 items.
Total scores range from 0-126 with higher scores indicating greater distress.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Symptoms - The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia - Cross Cutting Symptoms (K-SADS-CC)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The K-SADS-CC is a 21-item child-report survey assessing psychiatric symptoms common across different psychiatric disorders.
Each item assesses the severity of a psychiatric symptom during the past two weeks on a scale of 0-4.
Total scores range from 0-84 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of psychiatric symptoms.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
|
Mean Change Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Symptoms - The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia - Cross Cutting Symptoms (K-SADS-CC)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
The NIDA mASSIST is a 15-item child-report survey assessing the use of substances.
Each item assesses the frequency of use for a specified substance during the past two weeks on a scale of 0-4.
Change in the use of individual substances can be examined over time.
A polysubstance use severity score can also be generated by summing the frequencies of all individual items.
Total scores for the polysubstance use severity score range from 0-84 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of substance use.
|
Baseline (pre-treatment), Week 19 (post-treatment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chad E Shenk, PhD, University of Rochester
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
- Mental Disorders
- Neoplasms
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Hematologic Diseases
- Lymphatic Diseases
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Leukemia, Lymphoid
- Leukemia
- Stress Disorders, Traumatic
- Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00010448
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on PTSD
-
University of PittsburghCompletedPTSD | Non PTSDUnited States
-
COMPASS PathwaysNot yet recruitingPTSD | PTSD, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | PTSD Symptoms | PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
-
Valhalla Project NiagaraRecruiting
-
York UniversityRecruiting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Withdrawn
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of TexasCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; D...Completed
Clinical Trials on Emotion Regulation
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityUniversity of MichiganCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Distress, Emotional | Emotional DysfunctionUnited States
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityRecruitingDepression | Anxiety | Distress, Emotional | Rumination | Self-Criticism | WorryUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...CompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Executive Dysfunction | Emotion Dysregulation | Emotion DysfunctionUnited States
-
Douglas MenninWeill Medical College of Cornell University; Kent State UniversityCompletedGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Depression, Anxiety | Anxiety Disorders and Symptoms | Emotional DysfunctionUnited States
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityActive, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety | Distress, Emotional | Rumination | Self-Criticism | WorryUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetNot yet recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Intellectual Disabilities (F70-F79)
-
City University of Hong KongInternational Social Service Hong Kong BranchCompletedParent-Child Relations | Happiness | Emotion Regulation | Positive AffectChina
-
Tel Aviv UniversityRecruiting
-
Beijing Normal UniversityCompletedInternet Gaming Disorder | Emotion RegulationChina
-
Michal AssafRecruiting