Evaluation of Balance and Physical Performance Under Dual Task Conditions in Individuals With and Without Generalized Joint Hypermobility

June 22, 2025 updated by: Busra Sirin, Beylikduzu State Hospital
This study aims to evaluate balance and physical performance under dual task conditions in individuals with and without Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH), as determined by the Beighton score. All participants will undergo the One-Leg Stance Test and 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test under both single-task (balance only) and dual-task (simultaneous cognitive task) conditions. The cognitive task will involve counting backward by sevens from a given number. Participants will also complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test under both single- and dual-task conditions. Additionally, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) will be used for comprehensive balance assessment. Balance confidence will be evaluated using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-16), and fear of falling will be assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Changes in performance under dual-task conditions will be expressed as a percentage using the Dual Task Cost (DTC) formula

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

hypermobile patients and healthy controls

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 40 years
  • A Beighton score of 4 or higher (indicative of Generalized Joint Hypermobility)
  • Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 or older than 40 years
  • Presence of neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy)
  • History of vestibular system disorders (e.g., benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, vestibular neuritis)
  • History of orthopedic conditions affecting the lower extremities (e.g., fracture, joint replacement, ligament injury)
  • Cognitive impairment preventing the execution of cognitive tasks
  • Diagnosis of systemic musculoskeletal diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in balance training or neurological/physiotherapy programs within the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control group
no intervention
patients with hypermobility
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance in the One-Leg Stance Test
Time Frame: 0 day
Assesses static balance capacity and the impact of a simultaneous cognitive task on postural control.
0 day
Performance in the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test
Time Frame: 0 day
Evaluates lower extremity muscle endurance and functional strength under cognitive load
0 day
Performance in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: 0 day
Measures dynamic balance, mobility, and the ability to maintain performance during divided attention.
0 day
Dual Task Cost (DTC) percentage
Time Frame: 0 day
Quantifies the percentage change in performance when a cognitive task is added, reflecting dual-task interference.
0 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS):
Time Frame: 0 day
Provides a comprehensive evaluation of functional balance through various static and dynamic tasks. The maximum score is 56. Higher scores indicate that good balance.
0 day
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-16)
Time Frame: 0 day
Reflects the individual's perceived confidence in performing daily activities without losing balance.The maximum score is 100, the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate that high confidence patient's balance.
0 day
Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I):
Time Frame: 0 day
Assesses fear of falling during daily life activities, indicating fall-related psychological concerns. Higher scores indicate that high degree fear of falling
0 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BeylikduzuStateH22

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypermobility Syndrome

Clinical Trials on no intervention

Subscribe