Assessment of Gastric Motility on Funtional Dyspepsia and Joint Hypermobility Syndrome

February 18, 2020 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as the presence of gastroduodenal symptoms in the absence of organic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Joint hypermobility (JH) refers to the increased passive or active movement of a joint beyond its normal range. Recent reports have highlighted the co-existence of FD with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type III or hypermobility type (EDSIII). The association between FD and EDS III, and the underlying pathophysiological alterations, are poorly understood. We hypothesised that EDS III might influence gastroduodenal sensorimotor function, resulting in dyspeptic symptoms. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the impact of EDS III on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance and dyspeptic symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia.Our aim is to study the prevalence of EDSIII in FD compared to healthy subjects (HS) and to study the impact of co-existing EDSIII on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance and dyspeptic symptoms in FD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with PDS diagnosis as per Rome III by Rome III questionnaire and healthy subjects with out gastrointestinal symptoms

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with PDS diagnosis as per Rome III by Rome III questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are met:

  • Females who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Patients who are H. Pylori positive
  • Patients with confirmed gastro-intestinal disease, with former digestive surgery affecting upper gut motility, a concomitant disease responsible for digestive symptoms
  • Patients presenting with predominant symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), CIN or GERD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Functional dyspepsia patients with JHS
Patients with functional dyspepsia as defined by the Rome III criteria and joint hypermobility syndrome as defined by the Beighton Hypermobility criteria.

Gastrointestinal function is assessed by the intragastric pressure measurement by a high resolution manometry. This is an examination test considered standard of care for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in the university hospital of leuven.

The joint hypermobility syndrome is assess by means of the Brighton criteria.

Other Names:
  • No intervention: assessment of JHS
Functional dyspepsia patients without JHS
Patients with functional dyspepsia as defined by the Rome III criteria and WITHOUT joint hypermobility syndrome as defined by the Beighton Hypermobility criteria.

Gastrointestinal function is assessed by the intragastric pressure measurement by a high resolution manometry. This is an examination test considered standard of care for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in the university hospital of leuven.

The joint hypermobility syndrome is assess by means of the Brighton criteria.

Other Names:
  • No intervention: assessment of JHS
Healthy subjects
Healthy subjects with no gastrointestinal diseases including no functional dyspepsia

Gastrointestinal function is assessed by the intragastric pressure measurement by a high resolution manometry. This is an examination test considered standard of care for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in the university hospital of leuven.

The joint hypermobility syndrome is assess by means of the Brighton criteria.

Other Names:
  • No intervention: assessment of JHS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastric motility in JHS and non-JHS
Time Frame: 2 years
This is a physiological parameter. Intragastric pressure measurement (mmHg) in JHS and non-JHS are compared to the Intragastric pressure measurement (mmHg) of healthy subjects. During the intragastric pressure measurement, the pressure drop (mmHg) from baseline during the intragastric infussion of a liquid meal will be assessed and compared in both groups (patients vs. controls).
2 years
Prevalence of JHS in functional dyspepsia
Time Frame: 2 years
The number of patients with JHS and without JHS will be assessed. Based on the number of patients in each group, propotions (in %) can be calculated of the presence of JHS in a functional dyspepsia cohort.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of dyspepsia symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years
prevalence of dyspepsia symptoms in FD patients with JHS compared to patients without JHS.
2 years
Level of nutrient tolerance during the intragastric pressure measurement in JHS
Time Frame: 2 years
During the intragastric pressure assessment, a liquid nutrient drink is intragastrically infussed until the subjects experience and repport maximal satiation. Maximal satiation is assessed every minute during the intragastric infussion of the nutrient drink by means of questionnaires (VAS score: 0, no sensation; 5, maximal satiation). For this outcome, the quantity of nutrient drink tolerated during the test will be measured (ml) in patients with and without JHS and compared.
2 years
Level of nutrient tolerance during the intragastric pressure measurement in patients vs controls
Time Frame: 2 years
During the intragastric pressure assessment, a liquid nutrient drink is intragastrically infussed until the subjects experience and repport maximal satiation. Maximal satiation is assessed every minute during the intragastric infussion of the nutrient drink by means of questionnaires (VAS score: 0, no sensation; 5, maximal satiation). For this outcome, the quantity of nutrient drink tolerated during the test will be measured (ml) in patients with and without JHS and will be compared with the amount of volume (ml) assessed in healthy subjects.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 4, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Dyspepsia

Clinical Trials on No intervention: assessment of GI function

3
Subscribe