- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07062458
- Original Trial
A Comparative Study of Nipple Sensation Preservation After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Conventional, Endoscopic, Robotic Techniques (NIPSENSE)
NIPSENSE - A Comparative Study of Nipple and Skin Sensation Preservation After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Conventional, Endoscopic, and Robotic Techniques
The goal of this comparative study is to learn how different surgical methods affect nipple and skin sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The study will compare three types of NSM: conventional, endoscopic, and robotic.
The main question it aims to answer is:
How much nipple sensation do participants keep after each type of surgery?
Researchers will also look at surgery-related complications, patient-reported outcomes like body image and quality of life, and tissue analysis to see if there is a link between nerve structures and sensation.
Participants will:
Have NSM using one of the three surgical approaches
Receive breast reconstruction with an implant during the same surgery
Complete nipple sensation tests before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery
Answer surveys about their quality of life and body image
Provide surgical tissue for analysis (as part of the planned procedure)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The NIPSENSE study is a prospective, single-center study comparing how well nipple sensation is preserved after three types of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM): Conventional NSM (C-NSM), Endoscopic NSM (E-NSM), and Robotic NSM (R-NSM). The goal is to better understand the sensory and quality-of-life outcomes associated with each technique.
A total of 90 female participants (30 in each group) will be recruited. All will undergo NSM with direct-to-implant reconstruction. Participants will be assessed for nipple and skin sensation before surgery, and again at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, using a standard medical tool called the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer.
The study will also evaluate:
Surgical complications (e.g., infection, bleeding, skin necrosis)
Patient-reported outcomes using validated tools like the Hopwood Body Image Scale and EORTC questionnaires
Tissue analysis to explore whether preserved nerve structures are related to the level of sensation after surgery
This study will provide important data about how surgical methods impact physical and emotional outcomes for people undergoing mastectomy. The findings may help improve patient care and inform future decisions about surgical approaches to breast cancer treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Giada Pozzi, MD
- Phone Number: +39 011 9933017
- Email: giada.pozzi@ircc.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Torino, Italy, 10060
- Recruiting
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS
-
Contact:
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS
- Phone Number: +39 0119933111
- Email: social@ircc.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients aged ≥18 years.
- Diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer or deemed at high risk for breast cancer (eg. BRCA1-2 mutations).
- Candidates for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM).
- Able to provide informed consent.
- No contraindications for surgery based on physical examination and preoperative assessment.
- Signed the consent forms and willing to participate in all scheduled follow-up assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous breast surgery.
- History of radiation therapy to the chest/breast area.
- Active or non-controlled diabetes mellitus.
- Neuropathies causing potentially altered skin sensation.
- Nipple involvement by cancer, clinical or reported intra-operatively via frozen section analysis (the procedure will be converted to SSM).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (C-NSM)
Participants in this group will undergo a standard open nipple-sparing mastectomy using traditional surgical instruments.
The procedure is performed through a visible incision on the breast, while preserving the nipple and surrounding skin.
An implant is placed for immediate reconstruction.
|
the measurement of nipple sensation preservation, will be conducted using the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. The clinician will use the device to touch the nipple and the surrounding quadrants of the skin, applying filaments of increasing calibers (0.07gr, 0.4gr, 2.0gr, 4.0gr, 300gr), and the lightest caliber perceived by the patient will be recorded. This assessment will be conducted at four different times:
|
|
Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM)
This group will receive a minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy using an endoscopic technique.
The breast tissue is removed through a small incision in the armpit using a camera and specialized instruments.
An implant is placed during the same surgery
|
the measurement of nipple sensation preservation, will be conducted using the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. The clinician will use the device to touch the nipple and the surrounding quadrants of the skin, applying filaments of increasing calibers (0.07gr, 0.4gr, 2.0gr, 4.0gr, 300gr), and the lightest caliber perceived by the patient will be recorded. This assessment will be conducted at four different times:
|
|
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (R-NSM)
Participants in this group will undergo a robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy.
The surgery is performed using a robotic surgical system through a small armpit incision, offering enhanced precision and visualization.
Immediate implant reconstruction is also performed.
|
the measurement of nipple sensation preservation, will be conducted using the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. The clinician will use the device to touch the nipple and the surrounding quadrants of the skin, applying filaments of increasing calibers (0.07gr, 0.4gr, 2.0gr, 4.0gr, 300gr), and the lightest caliber perceived by the patient will be recorded. This assessment will be conducted at four different times:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
measurement of nipple sensation preservation
Time Frame: This assessment will be conducted at four different times: • Before surgery, to assess baseline sensation. • 1 month after surgery. • 3 months after surgery. • 6 months after surgery.
|
The primary objective, the measurement of nipple sensation preservation, will be conducted using the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer.
The clinician will use the device to touch the nipple and the surrounding quadrants of the skin, applying filaments of increasing calibers (0.07gr, 0.4gr, 2.0gr, 4.0gr, 300gr), and the lightest caliber perceived by the patient will be recorded.
|
This assessment will be conducted at four different times: • Before surgery, to assess baseline sensation. • 1 month after surgery. • 3 months after surgery. • 6 months after surgery.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
surgical outcomes
Time Frame: from enrollment to 3 months
|
nipple-areola complex necrosis, skin flaps necrosis, infection, bleeding, seroma, wound dehiscence,
|
from enrollment to 3 months
|
|
anatomopathological findings
Time Frame: 30-60 days post-surgery
|
the presence or absence of sensory cutaneous receptors in the subcutaneous layer of the specimen and their possible correlation to the degree of cutaneous sensation
|
30-60 days post-surgery
|
|
PROMs
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6 monts postoperatively
|
Questionnaires will be administered to the patients to assess patient-reported outcomes: Hopwood Body Image Scale (score 0 to 30, higher scores meaning a worst outcome), and EORTC - European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, BR-23 questionnaire (no total score, each question compared individually between groups)
|
From enrollment to 6 monts postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Giada Pozzi, MD, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;50(4):249-59. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91155-3.
- Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Nov;66(11):1521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.054. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
- Dossett LA, Lowe J, Sun W, Lee MC, Smith PD, Jacobsen PB, Laronga C. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;114(1):11-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.24264. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
- Moortgat P, Anthonissen M, Van Daele U, Meirte J, Vanhullebusch T, Maertens K. Objective Assessment Techniques: Physiological Parameters in Scar Assessment. 2020 Dec 8. In: Teot L, Mustoe TA, Middelkoop E, Gauglitz GG, editors. Textbook on Scar Management: State of the Art Management and Emerging Technologies [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. Chapter 18. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586121/
- Kostidou E, Schmelz M, Hasemaki N, Kokotis P. Objective Methods for Breast Sensibility Testing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):398-404. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005200.
- Tevlin R, Brazio P, Tran N, Nguyen D. Immediate targeted nipple-areolar complex re-innervation: Improving outcomes in immediate autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jul;74(7):1503-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
- Prado A, Andrades P, Benitez S, Parada F. Areola-nipple perception threshold to faradic electricity: a new measure of sensibility of the breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Sep;32(5):748-52. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9148-4. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
- Weinstein S. Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther. 1993 Jan-Mar;6(1):11-22; discussion 50.
- Santanelli F, Paolini G, Bittarelli D, Nofroni I. Computer-assisted evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensibility in macromastia and following superolateral pedicle reduction mammaplasty: a statistical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1679-1683. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258828.84107.59.
- van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, Vos EL, Verhoef C, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Koppert LB. Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;77(2):145-52. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000366.
- Kasielska-Trojan A, Szulia A, Zawadzki T, Antoszewski B. The Assessment of Nipple Areola Complex Sensation with Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments-Normative Values and Its Covariates. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;11(11):2145. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112145.
- Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Jun;30(3):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.12.006.
- Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Mar;105(3):905-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00012.
- Bijkerk E, Cornelissen AJM, Sommer M, Van Der Hulst RRWJ, Lataster A, Tuinder SMH. Intercostal nerve block of the anterior cutaneous branches and the sensibility of the female breast. Clin Anat. 2020 Oct;33(7):1025-1032. doi: 10.1002/ca.23532. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
- Riccio CA, Zeiderman MR, Chowdhry S, Brooks RM, Kelishadi SS, Tutela JP, Choo J, Yonick DV, Wilhelmi BJ. Plastic Surgery of the Breast: Keeping the Nipple Sensitive. Eplasty. 2015 Jul 2;15:e28. eCollection 2015.
- Sarhadi NS, Shaw-Dunn J, Soutar DS. Nerve supply of the breast with special reference to the nipple and areola: Sir Astley Cooper revisited. Clin Anat. 1997;10(4):283-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:43.0.CO;2-G.
- Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Stapleton SM, Basdag B, Seal SM, Rosson GD. Breast sensation after breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Jul;26(5):303-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249313. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- Rodriguez-Unda NA, Bello RJ, Clarke-Pearson EM, Sanyal A, Cooney CM, Manahan MA, Rosson GD. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Improves Long-Term Nipple But Not Skin Sensation After Breast Reconstruction: Quantification of Long-Term Sensation in Nipple Sparing Versus Non-nipple Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):697-703. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000900.
- Peled AW, Amara D, Piper ML, Klassen AF, Tsangaris E, Pusic AL. Development and Validation of a Nipple-Specific Scale for the BREAST-Q to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr;143(4):1010-1017. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005426.
- Howard MA, Sisco M, Yao K, Winchester DJ, Barrera E, Warner J, Jaffe J, Hulick P, Kuchta K, Pusic AL, Sener SF. Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;114(4):416-22. doi: 10.1002/jso.24364. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
- Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L, Geigant E, Solders G. Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Sep;50(6):443-9. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)90332-5.
- Hammond JB, Kandi LA, Armstrong VL, Kosiorek HE, Rebecca AM, Casey WJ 3rd, Kruger EA, Cronin PA, Pockaj BA, Teven CM. Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Sep;75(9):2914-2919. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.034. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
- Shaffer K, Danko M, DeLaere A, Chant E, Pople B, Grisby S, Dekhne N. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and assessment of nipple-areolar sensation. Breast J. 2019 May;25(3):542-544. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13274. Epub 2019 Apr 18. No abstract available.
- Akdeniz Dogan Z, Farhadi J. Evaluation of Sensation on Mastectomy Skin Flaps following Immediate Breast Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jul;36(6):420-425. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702157. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
- Khan A, Zhang J, Sollazzo V, Mohammed K, Gui G. Sensory change of the reconstructed breast envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;42(7):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
- Laverdet B, Danigo A, Girard D, Magy L, Demiot C, Desmouliere A. Skin innervation: important roles during normal and pathological cutaneous repair. Histol Histopathol. 2015 Aug;30(8):875-92. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-610. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
- Lai HW, Chang YL, Chandrachamnong K, See MH, Huang HI, Lin SL, Fang DY, Chen ST, Chen DR, Mok CW, Cheng FT. Factors associated with alteration of nipple or skin sensation and impact of duration of time following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM): an analysis of 460 cases with comparison of conventional versus endoscopic- or robotic-assisted NSM. World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 26;21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03107-5.
- Bueno JN, Haddad CAS, Rizzi SKLA, Giron PS, Facina G, Nazario ACP. Evaluation of body image, quality of life, tactile sensitivity and pain in women with breast cancer submitted to surgical intervention. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018 Jun;64(6):530-536. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.06.530.
- Barber R, Scheltens P, Gholkar A, Ballard C, McKeith I, Ince P, Perry R, O'Brien J. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and normal aging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;67(1):66-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.66.
- Lavery LA, Lavery DE, Lavery DC, Lafontaine J, Bharara M, Najafi B. Accuracy and durability of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: what is the useful service life? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 May 3.
- Longo B, Campanale A, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Nipple-areola complex cutaneous sensitivity: a systematic approach to classification and breast volume. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Dec;67(12):1630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
- Bell-Krotoski J. Advances in sensibility evaluation. Hand Clin. 1991 Aug;7(3):527-46.
- Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M. Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Sep;102(3):701-4. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199809030-00013.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NIPSENSE
- 00043/2025 (Registry Identifier: Comitato Etico Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.