Algo K Specific Manual Therapy for Sub Acute Low Back Pain With Radicular Symptoms (ALGO-K)

August 5, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of the Specificity of a Manual Therapy Based on a Decision Algorithm (Algo-K) in the Physiotherapy Treatment of Sub Acute Low Back Pain With Radiating Pain

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy approach based on the Algo-K decision algorithm in patients with subacute low back pain radiating to the lower limb. Algo-K helps select the most suitable lumbar mobilization technique according to the patient's pain response. The experimental group will receive a five-minute targeted manual therapy in addition to standard physiotherapy, while the control group will receive a non-specific mobilization. The study aims to determine whether this algorithm-guided intervention leads to faster and greater improvement in pain and disability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subacute low back pain (LBP) with radiating symptoms is a common musculoskeletal disorder with a risk of chronicization. Manual therapy is often used in physiotherapy to treat LBP, but its effectiveness varies widely due to heterogeneous practices and lack of specificity. The Algo-K algorithm was developed to guide therapists in selecting the most appropriate mobilization technique based on patients' symptomatic responses during movement tests.

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy guided by the Algo-K algorithm versus a non-specific manual therapy added to a standardized exercise-based physiotherapy program. Sixty adult patients with subacute LBP and radiating pain will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to either:

  • Experimental group: 5 minutes of specific lumbar mobilizations based on the Algo-K decision tree;
  • Control group: 5 minutes of non-specific mobilization at a distant thoracic level.

Both groups will receive the same standard physiotherapy care based on exercise and education, delivered over 12 sessions within a 60-day period.

The primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 26-30 days. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), pain distribution (body diagram), and long-term disability (ODI at 52-60 days). The hypothesis is that the specific, patient-tailored manual therapy will improve functional outcomes and reduce pain more effectively than non-specific mobilization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Romain ARTICO, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18 65 y o
  • Sub acute low back pain (7 days - 3 months) with irradiation to one lower limb, pain 3 10/10
  • Mechanically responsive pain
  • ODI > 20 % and < 80 %
  • Prescription ≥ 12 physiotherapy sessions (or un specified)
  • Able to complete 12 sessions in ≤ 60 days
  • Affiliated to French social security
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicion or history of serious pathology (cancer, systemic inflammatory disease, etc.)
  • Main complaint other than low back pain with irradiation
  • Prior spine or hip surgery (no time limit) / thoraco abdominal surgery < 3 y
  • Central Sensitization Inventory ≥ 37
  • HAD anxiety or depression sub score ≥ 8
  • Planned lumbar infiltration during follow up
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Legal protection (guardianship, custody, imprisonment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Specific manual therapy
Usual exercise based physiotherapy + 5 min lumbar PA mobilisations chosen with Algo K algorithm based on symptom response
Participants in this group receive a standardized physiotherapy program (exercise and education) plus 5 minutes of targeted lumbar postero anterior mobilizations. These mobilizations are selected using the Algo K decision algorithm, which guides the therapist to choose the most appropriate technique based on the patient's pain response during preliminary movement tests.
Sham Comparator: Non specific manual therapy
Same physiotherapy + 5 min PA mobilisations in upper thoracic spine, distant from symptoms
Participants in this group receive the same physiotherapy program, but the additional 5 minutes of mobilization are applied to the upper thoracic spine (T4-T7), away from the symptomatic lumbar region. This sham mobilization mimics the manual therapy without targeting the affected area or following the algorithm's logic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, %)
Time Frame: Baseline day to 26-30
Patient-reported disability (ODI French version)
Baseline day to 26-30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, %)
Time Frame: day 52-60 /or visit 12
Disability at end of follow-up
day 52-60 /or visit 12
Pain intensity (numeric rating scale, 0-10)
Time Frame: Baseline day 26-30 ; day 52-60 /or visit 12
Average pain last 24h
Baseline day 26-30 ; day 52-60 /or visit 12
Pain topography (body diagram score)
Time Frame: Baseline day 26-30 ; day 52-60 /or visit 12
Distal extension of symptoms
Baseline day 26-30 ; day 52-60 /or visit 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: valerie VACHER, DRCI-AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP230858
  • 2024-A01892-45 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sub Acute Low Back Pain With Radiating Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Specific Manual Therapy

Subscribe