Online Low-FODMAP Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Impact of an Online Service Offering Personalized Low-FODMAP Menus With Nutritional Support on Quality of Life and Control of Physical and Psychological Symptoms in People With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

This study aimed to assess the impact of implementing the low Fermentable Oligo-, Di- and Monosaccharides, And Polyols (FODMAP) diet, through an online educational service platform, on the quality of life of patients living with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A prospective single-group intervention pilot study involving patients with IBS from two hospitals was conducted. Participants followed the low FODMAP diet using a web-based platform for 6 months. The IBS quality of life questionnaire (IBS-QoL), the IBS symptom severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI) were completed at baseline, after the restriction phase and after reintroduction phase.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0A9
        • Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a diagnosis of IBS according to the Rome IV criteria by a gastroenterologist within the past three months
  • understand French
  • have an Internet access and a Facebook© account with a self-reported familiarity to use them

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients suffering from a known eating or mental health disorder
  • body mass index under 18.5 kg/m2
  • type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • pregnancy
  • other chronic gastrointestinal diseases, except gastroesophageal reflux

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online low-FODMAP diet
An innovative approach was developed by the SOSCuisine® platform, an online menu service adapted to different conditions, including IBS. It enables people living with IBS to follow the FODMAP protocol in a self-service context, using online resources of personalized weekly low-FODMAP menus, instructions for each phase and a peer support group moderated by a specialized registered dietitian.
Participants were invited to follow the online low-FODMAP diet offered by SOSCuisine®, characterized by three specific features. First, participants received customized weekly low-FODMAP menus based on the Monash University protocol. Second, a virtual assistant accompanied participants from the beginning to the end of the diet implementation, providing personalized recommendations tailored to individual's preferences and intensity of symptoms. For the reintroduction phase, the assistant guided individuals through the process of testing specific FODMAP subgroups, offering food suggestions based on individual preferences, and portion sizes. The last feature of the platform was the access to a peer support group on Facebook©, designed to foster communication among participants. This group allowed individuals to ask questions and receive valid answers, as the group was moderated by a FODMAP-specialized registered dietitian.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IBS-related quality of life
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months.
The primary outcome was the change in QoL from baseline to the end of study, assessed by the validated IBS-QoL questionnaire. This questionnaire assesses 8 domains, namely dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sexual concerns and relationships, from which a computed score is drawn. This score, ranging from 0 to 100, was developed to assess the self-reported QoL in IBS, a higher score indicating a better QoL.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of IBS symptoms
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months.
Secondary outcomes included changes in severity of IBS symptoms, measured by the validated IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS). This questionnaire evaluates 5 specific domains within the last ten days: abdominal pain severity, abdominal pain duration, abdominal distension, bowel habits dissatisfaction and interference with life. A composite score is calculated and varies from 0 to 500. Depending on the score, the severity can be classified in 4 categories: absence of symptoms severity or remission (score < 75), mild (score 75-174), moderate (score 175-299), and severe (score ≥ 300).
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months.
State and trait anxiety
Time Frame: From enrollement to the end of intervention at 6 months.
Anxiety was evaluated by the French-Canadian adaptation of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI), which specifically assesses state anxiety (STAI-S), the subjective and transient emotional state of anxiety, and trait anxiety (STAI-T), a more stable predisposition to anxiety. The STAI-S score can be classified in 5 categories: very low state anxiety (score < 36), low (score 36-45), moderate (score 46-55), high (score 56-65), and very high (score > 65). For the STAI-T score, a score inferior to 40 commonly indicates low trait anxiety while a score of 40 or more indicates high trait anxiety.
From enrollement to the end of intervention at 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe