Optimising Pacing Therapy, Integrated Medical Therapy, and Catheter AbLation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Trial (OPTIMAL AF-HF)

November 21, 2025 updated by: Jason Andrade, University of British Columbia
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF) are colliding global cardiovascular epidemics, individually impairing quality of life and cardiac performance, as well as increasing the risk of hospitalisation and mortality. When AF and HF co-exist, disease progression accelerates and the adverse outcomes are magnified, leading to incrementally higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. The management of AF has been dichotomised into the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm ("Rhythm control") or acceptance of AF with control of the ventricular response ("Rate control"). Previous studies suggested that pharmacologic rhythm control and pharmacologic rate control confer similar survival and morbidity outcomes in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Recognising the limitations of pharmacotherapy, more recent studies have examined the utility of catheter ablation procedures, either designed to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (e.g., catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation) or control the ventricular response (e.g., pacemaker implantation in combination with catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction). Compared to pharmacotherapy, these studies have suggested that catheter ablation may provide sustained improvements in quality of life, decreased hospitalisation and, potentially, improved survival for patients with co-existing AF and HF. However, these studies were performed prior to the modern era of quadruple LV enhancing therapy (beta-blocker, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor). The true impact of catheter-based interventions, and thus the optimal management of AF for patients with co-existing HF is not known. The investigators propose a randomised controlled trial to definitively answer the question regarding the optimal invasive treatment of AF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF - LVEF ≤ 40%).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1056

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 18 years or older on the date of Informed Consent,
  • Atrial fibrillation,
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less, measured within 6 months of enrollment,
  • Receiving stable foundational HF quadruple therapy at maximally tolerated dose,
  • BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL (NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/ml), measured within 1 month of randomisation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated life expectancy less than one year from the consent date,
  • Continuous atrial fibrillation of >1 year in duration,
  • Left atrial anteroposterior diameter > 6 cm, volume > 100 mL, or volume index > 60 mL/m2,
  • Previous left atrial ablation or left atrial surgery,
  • The presence of a percutaneous left atrial appendage closure device,
  • Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism,
  • Subject known to be pregnant or breast-feeding,
  • Contraindication to oral anticoagulation therapy,
  • Left atrial myxoma,
  • Myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention within 3-months of consent,
  • History of, or anticipated to undergo heart transplant, ventricular assist device insertion, or mitral or tricuspid valve repair or replacement within 3-months of the consent date.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Optimal Medical Therapy
Patients randomised to medical rate control will receive evidence-based beta-blockers (extended-release metoprolol succinate, bisoprolol, carvedilol), titrated to achieve a resting heart rate of <100 bpm during AF, in accordance with contemporary guidelines (Appendix B). In the event of patients not achieving satisfactory symptom or heart rate-control with monotherapy, then these agents may be combined with digoxin (trough target 0.5 and 0.9 ng/ml) or oral amiodarone.
Rate
Active Comparator: Catheter Ablation with The Goal of Sinus Rhythm Restoration (Pulmonary Vein Isolation)
Patients randomised to invasive rhythm control will undergo a percutaneous catheter ablation procedure using standardised techniques to achieve pulmonary vein isolation. The procedure will be performed with a combined radiofrequency + pulsed-field ablation energy catheter. Circumferential lesions around the veins will be considered complete when spontaneous, associated PV potentials are no longer recorded by the circular catheter (entrance block) and when exit block (dissociated spontaneous PV ectopy, and/or local PV capture without conduction from the pulmonary vein into the left atrium) has been demonstrated.
PVI
Active Comparator: Catheter Ablation with The Goal of Ventricular Rate Control and Regularization (AVJ Ablation)
Patients randomised to catheter ablation of the AV junction will undergo a percutaneous catheter ablation procedure using standardised techniques to achieve complete AV block. Patients randomised to AVJ ablation will receive a cardiac resynchronisation capable device owing to the risk of pacing induced cardiomyopathy (CRT-D if LVEF ≤35%, CRT-P or CSP with an FDA approved conduction system lead if LVEF 36-40%)
AVJ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and total number of heart failure events
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of ejection fraction, distance on the 6-minute walk test, and QOL score
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Time to death from any cause
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Time to death from cardiovascular cause
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with unplanned emergency department visit or all-cause hospitalisation
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with unplanned emergency department visit or hospitalisation for heart failure
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with unplanned emergency department visit or hospitalisation for atrial fibrillation or arrhythmia
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with heart failure event
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Change in Quality of Life from baseline
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with ischemic stroke or systemic arterial emboli
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of Participants with new onset cognitive dysfunction
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Change in left ventricular function (ejection fraction)
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Time to first appropriate and inappropriate ICD intervention (ATP or ICD shock)
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The decision to share IPD will be decided at a later dat by the academic steering committee.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on Pharmacological Rate Control

Subscribe