Trust in AI and Digitalization in Healthcare Across Generational Groups: A Comparative Study of Barriers and Facilitators Toward Equitable Adoption. (TRUST-AI)

December 12, 2025 updated by: Prof. Dr. Sonia Lippke, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Acceptance and Perceived Benefits of Digitalization by Medical Assistants and Other Generational Groups (ANDI-MFA-2): "Trust in AI and Digitalization in Healthcare Across Generational Groups: A Comparative Study of Barriers and Facilitators Toward Equitable Adoption"

This study aims to investigate differences in perception of barriers and facilitators of digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage in healthcare across different generational groups (youth, working-age adults, and seniors). The results will help create practical recommendations for public health projects and consultants to support fair and inclusive use of new digital tools in healthcare. A cross-sectional online survey will be conducted among students at HAW, patients and employees in the rehabilitation center in Oldenburg, and seniors participating in the "Digital im Alter"(DIA) project.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This study will use an online questionnaire to collect data from respondents about their attitudes toward digital technologies and artificial intelligence in healthcare, as well as their opinions about barriers and facilitators for the equal adoption of modern technologies. The survey will be conducted in November to December 2025.

The survey will use validated scales, including the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Human-Computer Trust Scale (HCTS), combined with additional items assessing perceived barriers and facilitators. Open-ended questions will allow participants to express their views on barriers and facilitators in their own words and from their perspective.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bremen, Germany, 28759
        • Recruiting
        • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sonia Lippke, PhD
      • Hamburg, Germany, 21033
        • Active, not recruiting
        • HAW Hamburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is chosen in a way that the cohorts can cover all three generations required for the comparative study. Therefore, the cohorts in this study are:

  • Students at Hamburg University of Applied Sciences.
  • Seniors participating in "Digital in Old Age" training courses.
  • Patients and employees at a rehabilitation center in Oldenburg.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Belonging to one of the defined participant groups
  • Consent to participate in the online survey
  • Ability to participate in the survey (e.g., sufficient German or English language skills)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals under 18
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Illiteracy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Students
Students at HAW Hamburg
Rehabilitation Center Oldenburg patients and employees
Patients and employees at a rehabilitation center Oldenburg.
training course participants
Seniors participating in "Digital in Old Age" training courses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trust in digitalization and AI in healthcare
Time Frame: December 2025 - January 2026
  • Measured with the adapted Human-Computer Trust Scale (HCTS). Total scores are calculated by summing ten items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), resulting in a minimum possible score of 10 and a maximum of 50. Higher scores indicate a greater level of trust in the computer system or AI.
  • Comparison across generational groups (youth, working-age adults, seniors).
December 2025 - January 2026
Perceived barriers to adoption of AI and digitalization in healthcare
Time Frame: December 2025 - January 2026
  • Measured with 5 Likert-scale items (accuracy, privacy and security, lack of human contact, ethics, lack of knowledge). Each item is rated from 1 = no concern to 5 = very strong concern.
  • Open-ended question: "What is your biggest concern about AI and digital technologies in healthcare and why?"
  • Comparison across generational groups (youths, working-age adults, seniors). Analysis of universal and generation-specific barriers.
December 2025 - January 2026
Perceived facilitators to the adoption of AI and digitalization in healthcare
Time Frame: December 2025 - January 2026
  • Measured with 6 Likert-scale items (clear explanations, regulation, professional review, transparent data use, training, success stories). Each item is rated from 1 = not effective to 5 = very effective.
  • Open-ended question: "What would help you personally to trust in digital technologies and AI in healthcare?"
  • Comparison across generational groups (youths, working-age adults, seniors). Analysis of universal and generation-specific facilitators.
December 2025 - January 2026

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
eHealth literacy and digital skills
Time Frame: December 2025 - January 2026
  • Measured with the eHEALS (The eHealth Literacy Scale). Total scores are calculated by summing eight items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), resulting in a minimum possible score of 8 and a maximum of 40. Higher scores indicate better perceived eHealth literacy.
  • Descriptive analysis and role as a potential moderator of trust and acceptance across generational groups.
December 2025 - January 2026

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Digital Health

Subscribe