Remote Clinical Monitoring After Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (TOTEM)

September 26, 2025 updated by: Stessel Björn, Jessa Hospital

Remote Clinical Monitoring After Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: a Pilot and Feasibility Study

This feasibility trial has three main objectives:

  • To investigate the impact of the transmural care pathway TOTeM on the Length of Stay (LOS) for patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy.
  • To investigate the feasibility of the implementation of TOTeM for patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatic surgery, we will measure the recruitment rate by tracking the number of eligible patients who are approached for participation, the percentage who consent to join the study over a specified time period, and the adherence rate which describes how well participants follow the study protocol including the prescribed interventions or follow-up assessments.
  • Assessment of the potential changes in medical costs and outcomes for the purpose of performing a cost-effectiveness analysis from a hospital and patient perspective.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Due to fast progress and improvements in robotic surgery, minimally invasive procedures for complex surgery have become increasingly feasible for the vast majority of patients. Over recent years, minimally distal pancreatectomy (MDP) has become the preferred approach for distal pancreatectomy. This minimally invasive alternative offers less postoperative pain, better cosmetic outcomes, a quicker recovery, a shorter hospital stay, decreased morbidity, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and reduced health care costs. This shift in care models has enabled patients to return home more quickly after surgery, while their recovery continues to be closely monitored.

Hospitals are increasingly confronted with high bed occupancy rates and the need to use staff more efficiently. This has emphasized the importance of optimizing the length of stay for patients undergoing pancreatectomy, ensuring they can be discharged sooner without compromising their recovery. Early discharge from the hospital, combined with remote monitoring, offers a promising solution to these challenges. Thanks to advances in technology, patients can be monitored remotely after discharge by healthcare professionals allowing for early detection of potential complications and timely intervention, all while the patient recovers in the comfort of their own home. This approach also facilitates the effective implementation of transmurally coordinated care pathways (care delivered across different levels of the healthcare system), ensuring seamless communication and care transitions between hospital and home.

The TOTeM (Transmurale Opvolging met TeleMonitoring na chirurgie) project, supported by the Federale Overheidsdienst Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, focuses on remote monitoring of patients with the help of wearable monitoring devices and a telemonitoring hub. Unlike the current approach where the patient is admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery, patients will be immediately transferred to the ward. The patient is sent home after surgery as early as medically possible (as defined by reaching all of the time to be fit criteria), with qualitative and specialized follow-up in the home setting. The time to be fit criteria include: oral pain medication only, independent walking, oral intake, hemodynamically (90% of baseline blood pressure, heart rate in 90% of normal range) and respiratory (no need for extra oxygen) stable, and no drains or urinary catheters. After discharge, the patient is contacted by the telemonitoring hub through a daily videocall. Parameters are assessed up to three times a day. Follow-up via the mobile application and videocall is foreseen up to ten days postoperatively. The telemonitoring hub screens all input from the questionnaires completed by the patient as well as the parameters that are obtained via wearable monitoring devices. If necessary, the patient is contacted or an escalation protocol is triggered. The project aims to enable a faster recovery of patients in a familiar home environment and a more active role of the patient in their recovery process. For the hospital, the faster discharge offers the opportunity to optimize bed occupancy. On a societal level, the social cost of care may decrease.

This pilot and feasibility study focuses on the application of remote clinical monitoring following robotic distal pancreatectomy. By evaluating the feasibility and effect of the implementation of such a care model, this research aims to contribute to optimizing care for patients undergoing these complex procedures, while also alleviating pressure on hospital resources and staff.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-75 years old
  • Competent to provide informed consent
  • Fluent in Dutch
  • Cognitively capable of understanding and engaging with the study
  • Undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy
  • Owing a smartphone or has a caregiver who can assist
  • Does not live alone
  • Have a valid national identification number

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extended left pancreatectomy
  • Spleen-preserving procedure
  • Residing in a nursing home
  • Patients who are deemed unsuitable for the study by the physician based on clinical evaluation
  • Absence of informed consent or request to not participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote clinical monitoring
The application of remote clinical monitoring after a distal robotic pancreatectomy
Patients after a distal pancreatectomy will be discharged faster from the hospital and will be remote monitored

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: during hospital stay, an average of 4 days
The primary outcome measurement for the TOTeM care pathway in patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy is the length of stay, which is the total time measured from day of surgery to the day of hospital discharge
during hospital stay, an average of 4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the recruitment rate
Time Frame: during whole study period, an average of 1 year
The feasibility of this pilot study is assessed by means of the recruitment rate, defined by the number of eligible patients who are approached for participation and the percentage who consent to join the study over a specified time period. The recruitment rate is defined as excellent if 20 patients can be enrolled in this study in one year.
during whole study period, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of the adherence rate
Time Frame: during whole study period, an average of 1 year
The feasibility of this pilot study is assessed by the adherence rate, which describes how well participants follow the study protocol including the prescribed interventions or follow-up assessments. The adherence rate is defined as excellent if ≥80% of the patients followed the study protocol including the prescribed interventions or follow-up assessments.
during whole study period, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of medical costs
Time Frame: during study time of patient, an average of 3 months
Evaluation of the potential changes in medical costs for the hospital and for the individual patient
during study time of patient, an average of 3 months
Assessment of surgical fear
Time Frame: At baseline
The short and long term surgical fear questionnaire will be evaluated at baseline, before the surgery. The short and long term questionnaire consist each of 4 questions, where 0 indicates no fear and 10 indicates extreme fear.
At baseline
Quality of Life: EQ5D Questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline (day of surgery), Day7, Day28, Month3
Questionnaire measuring patients' general health and quality of life: EQ5D = EuroQol-5 Dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. A score of 0 represent a very low quality of life, where score of 1 represents the maximum score.
at baseline (day of surgery), Day7, Day28, Month3
Quality of Life: SF-36 Questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline, Day 7, Day 28, Month 3
This questionnaire contains 36 questions and 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical limitations, mental functioning, emotional limitations, social functioning, pain, general health, vitality. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
at baseline, Day 7, Day 28, Month 3
Evaluation of the technology acceptance questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
Evaluation of the technology acceptance questionnaire, which contains 17 statements where patient can (completely) disagree, no opion or (completely) agree with.
baseline
Pain scores (numerical rating scales)
Time Frame: 3 times per day for 10 days after the surgery
Evaluation of different pain scores (abdominal pain, lower abdominal pain, pain at wound stitch hole, shoulder pain and pain after eating). These are numerical rating scales with 0 having no pain at all and 10 having extreme pain.
3 times per day for 10 days after the surgery
Satisfaction of patients
Time Frame: on day 10 after the surgery
  • Degree to which the patient is satisfied with the care pathway, felt safe during remote monitoring, and if they received sufficient information about the follow-up period.
  • Measured with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), with 0 not satisfied at all and 10 extremely satisfied
on day 10 after the surgery
Evaluation of pain medication
Time Frame: daily up to 10 days after surgery
Assessment of the number of pain medication taken every day after the surgery
daily up to 10 days after surgery
Evaluation of the acceptability of the remote care pathway
Time Frame: on postoperative day 10
This wil be evaluated with a validated questionnaire containing 8 statements which the patient need to score as (completely) agree, no opinion or (completely) disagree
on postoperative day 10
Evaluation of study patients admitted to the ICU
Time Frame: during study period, an average of 1 year
The number of patients admitted to the ICU after surgery will be assessed
during study period, an average of 1 year
Evaluation of unplanned medical consultations or visits
Time Frame: during study period of the patient, an average of 3 months
Assessment of unplanned readmission rate and/or unscheduled home visits from a general practitioner or other medical doctor and/or emergency consultations
during study period of the patient, an average of 3 months
Evaluation of post-operative complicatons
Time Frame: during study period of the patient, an average of 3 months
Assessment of post-operative complications associated with distal pancreatectomy
during study period of the patient, an average of 3 months
Evaluation of respiratory rate
Time Frame: during 10 days after surgery
Assessment of the respiratory rate, defined in breaths per minute.
during 10 days after surgery
Evaluation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Time Frame: on postoperative day 10
This wil be evaluated with a validated questionnaire containing 8 statements which the patient need to score as (completely) agree, no opinion or (completely) disagree
on postoperative day 10
Evaluation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: on postoperative day 10
This wil be evaluated with a validated questionnaire containing 8 statements which the patient need to score as (completely) agree, no opinion or (completely) disagree
on postoperative day 10
Evaluation of temperature
Time Frame: during 10 days after surgery
Assessment of the temperature of the patient, defined in °C.
during 10 days after surgery
Evaluation of oxygen saturation in blood
Time Frame: during 10 days after surgery
Assessment of oxygen saturation in blood, measured in %
during 10 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025/012

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Digital Health

Clinical Trials on Remote clinical monitoring

Subscribe