Immunoadsorption in Autoimmune Long COVID (TURNLongCOVID)

December 18, 2025 updated by: W. J. Wiersinga, MD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Phase I-II With Immunoadsorption in Autoimmune Long COVID

Some people continue to have serious symptoms long after COVID-19, such as extreme fatigue and feeling worse after activity. In some patients, this may happen because the immune system is attacking the body by mistake.

This study will test a treatment called immunoadsorption, which filters the blood to remove harmful antibodies. People with long COVID who have these antibodies will be randomly assigned to receive either the real treatment or a placebo. The main goal is to see whether fatigue improves after one month, and whether other symptoms and daily functioning improve over six months.

This research will help us find out if this treatment can benefit the group of long COVID patients with immune-related disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Growing evidence indicates that autoantibodies may drive symptoms in a subset of people with long COVID, as demonstrated by symptom transfer to mice following administration of IgG from affected patients. This provides a strong rationale for targeted immunotherapy aimed at removing pathogenic antibodies. Immunoadsorption is a well-established method to reduce circulating IgG, but studies suggest that only a specific subgroup of patients benefits.

Using HuProt autoantibody microarray technology, we identified several autoantibodies uniquely present in long COVID patients compared with healthy controls. We subsequently developed and validated a disease-specific Luminex multiplex immunoassay to detect this autoimmune phenotype. This study will use these findings as a novel selection method of identifying long COVID patients with pathogenic IgG, thereby enriching the population most likely to benefit from immunoadsorption therapy.

This biomarker-guided personalized medicine approach could enhance treatment efficacy and advances long COVID therapeutic strategies. Additionally, the placebo-controlled and double blinded design will be needed to evaluate the true potential of autoantibodies adsorption therapy in long COVID. This study can add to our understanding on the role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of long COVID and could help in the development of precision-based immunotherapy for patients such as immunoadsorption.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Long COVID based on the WHO-criteria
  • PEM according to the DSQ-PEM
  • BELL's functionality score 20-70%
  • Good health prior to the long COVID diagnosis (WHO performance score 0)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical history of clinically significant respiratory- or cardiovascular disease
  • Prior interventional cardiac procedure within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Active immunosuppresive treatment for systemic autoimmune disorders
  • Diabetes type 1
  • Solid organ malignancy in the last 5 years
  • Active psychiatric disorder currently under treatment by a psychiatrist
  • BMI > 35
  • Pre-existing fatigue
  • Poor performance score prior to the long COVID diagnosis (WHO performance >0)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Placebo
Participants in the placebo group will receive six sessions of sham treament, each lasting 2.5 hours over two weeks. The procedure will be performed without an adsorption column, allowing the blood to circulate through the extracorporeal circuit and be returned to the patient without removal of immunoglobulins or other plasma components.
The immunoadsorption column will be removed from the device, so that the patient's blood passes through the system and is returned to the body without undergoing adsorption or removal of antibodies.
Active Comparator: Immunoadsorption
Participants in the intervention group will receive six sessions of immunoadsorption, each lasting 2.5 hours over two weeks. Immunoadsorption will be performed using tryptophan columns, which bind the Fc region of IgG via hydrophobic and aromatic interactions.
Immunoadsorption will be performed using tryptophan columns, which bind the Fc region of IgG via hydrophobic and aromatic interactions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue measured by the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)
Time Frame: At baseline and 28 days after start treatment
Score range 10-50 (10 items, Likert scale 1-5). Higher scores indicate more severe fatigue (worse). The difference in scores from baseline will be measured (MCID of 4 points) as the primary outcome.
At baseline and 28 days after start treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health related quality of life using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Eight domains scored from 0-100. Domain scores are commonly summarized into the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (norm-based, mean 50, SD 10). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life and functioning.
At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Change in cognitive functioning using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Cognitive Function Short Form 8a (PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 8a)
Time Frame: At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Raw scores are converted to T-scores (20-80), with a population mean of 50 (SD 10). Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. Change in score will be measured (MCID 3-5).
At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Change in autonomic symptoms using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31)
Time Frame: At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
0-100 weighted total score across six domains: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater autonomic symptom burden.
At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the intervention
Time Frame: From first study intervention through day 180
All AEs and SAEs will be recorded, graded according to CTCAE v5.0, and assessed for relatedness to the study treatment. Specific attention will be given to complications of extracorporeal procedures (e.g., hypotension, bleeding, allergic reactions, infection, and vascular access issues)
From first study intervention through day 180
Repeated Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Handgrip strength will be assessed using a calibrated handheld dynamometer at four standardized measurement points in accordance with the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) guidelines. Grip strength will be recorded in kilograms (kg). Higher grip strength reflects better muscle function.
At baseline and days 28, 60, 90, and 180
Orthostatic intolerance using the NASA lean test
Time Frame: At baseline and days 28 and 180
The NASA Lean Test is a standardized active standing test used to assess orthostatic intolerance. Participants rest in a supine position followed by an active standing phase while leaning against a wall to minimize skeletal muscle pumping. Heart rate and blood pressure are measured at predefined intervals during standing. Abnormal heart rate and/or blood pressure responses during the test indicate orthostatic intolerance.
At baseline and days 28 and 180
Efficacy treatment by measuring immunoglobuline titers
Time Frame: At baseline (prior to treatment initiation), during treatment, and at days 28 and 180 after treatment initiation.
Immunoglobulin G titers will be measured in blood samples using standardized laboratory assays and reported as concentrations (g/L).
At baseline (prior to treatment initiation), during treatment, and at days 28 and 180 after treatment initiation.
Autoantibody score using an in-house Luminex assay
Time Frame: At screening and on days 28, 60, 90, and 180
For this assay, IgG will be isolated from patient serum samples obtained during screening and analyzed using a Luminex-based multiplex immunoassay targeting a panel of 15 validated autoantigens. A weighted scoring system is applied to the resulting autoantibody signals.
At screening and on days 28, 60, 90, and 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 12, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 12, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

all request will be discussed within the study team

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Long COVID

Clinical Trials on Sham Comparator

Subscribe