Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment of Insomnia with Subjective Cognitive Decline

November 26, 2024 updated by: Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment of Insomnia with Subjective Cognitive Decline: a Randomized Controlled Trail

Insomnia is the most common form of sleep disorder, and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in patients with insomnia may be an ultra-early manifestation of AD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising tool for the treatment of insomnia by modulating neural excitability and inducing plasticity. However, there is a lack of studies on rTMS treatment of cognitive impairment associated with insomnia. The efficacy and safety of rTMS for cognitive impairment in insomnia patients with SCD will be assessed by a randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Aged 30-80 years old; (2) Diagnostic criteria for insomnia: DSM-V and ICSD-3; (3) Subjective cognitive decline. (4) Regular use of non-benzodiazepines for insomnia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Refuse participants; (2) Presence of cognitive dysfunction; (3) Combined with other diseases other than central nervous system non-neurodegenerative diseases; (4) Use drugs that may affect cognition, degree of awakening and sleep quality due to other diseases; (5) Contraindications to rTMS treatment: (6) Severe complications and immune diseases; (7) Inability to cooperate; (8) Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: rTMS
Stimulation coil Cool-B65 A CO, located right lingual gyrus, stimulation frequency 1Hz, stimulation intensity 80% of motor threshold, number of stimuli 3 pulses/train, train interval 1s, 500 trains in total, 1500 total stimulation pulses, total stimulation time 20 min, treatment application once a day, continuous application for two weeks, 5 days a week.
Sham Comparator: sham rTMS
Stimulation coil Cool-B65 P CO, located right lingual gyrus, stimulation frequency 1Hz, stimulation intensity 80% of motor threshold, number of stimuli 3 pulses/train, train interval 1s, 500 trains in total, 1500 total stimulation pulses, total stimulation time 20 min, treatment application once a day, continuous application for two weeks, 5 days a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline SCD-Q9 to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
9-item Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q9)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline MMSE to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline MoCA scores to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline CDR to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline RAVLT to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline HAMA to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Human Anti-Murine Antibodies (HAMA)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline HAMD to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline NPI to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline CDS to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Coding Digit Symbol subtest (CDS)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline DDS to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Direct Digit Span subtest (DDS)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline inflammatory factors and neuropathological markers to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Aβ, tau, GFAP, α-Synuclein, NFL, VEGF, AQP4, RNA sequencing, pre.Caspase1, cl.Caspase1, pre.IL-1β, cl.IL-1β, IL-18, GSDMD, ASC, NLRP1, Iba-1, GFAP, NeuN, CD86, CD206, iNOS, Arg1, TLR4, TLR2, MyD88, NFκB, tau, p-NFκB, NLRP3, β-actin, ect.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline PAF to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
The alpha-peak frequency (PAF) is the frequency with the highest power within the alpha-band.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline structural imaging indicators to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
The intra-cellular compartment (Vic) of the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) model represents diffusion within the axons and cells.And NODDI models the dispersion of axonal fibers with the use of an Orientation Dispersion Index (ODI).
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline adverse events to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Headache, tinnitus, pure tone hearing disorder, ect.
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Change from baseline TMS-EEG to 2 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment
Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG)
Baseline vs 2 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insomnia Chronic

Clinical Trials on rTMS

Subscribe