Safety and Performances of the LINEA Cardiac Pacing Lead Optimized for the Implantation in Interventricular Septum (STARLIGHT)

February 13, 2026 updated by: MicroPort CRM
The purpose of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and performances of the new LINEA cardiac pacing lead, intended for placement at the interventricular septum.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria (phase I and II):

  • Patient indicated for cardiac pacing according to the most recent guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
  • Patient planned for a de novo implantation of an ALIZEA, BOREA or CELEA Single Chamber (SR) or Dual Chamber (DR) pacemaker from MicroPort CRM
  • Patient planned for a catheter-guided ventricular pacing lead implantation in the interventricular septum area
  • Patient's pacemaker with the remote monitoring functions accepted by the patient and planned to be activated

Exclusion criteria (phase I and II):

  • Patient planned for a device upgrade, or a device or a lead replacement
  • Patient with a congenital heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or infiltrative cardiomyopathy
  • Patient with a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%
  • Patient already enrolled in another clinical investigation that could confound the results of this clinical investigation (e.g., clinical investigations involving intra-cardiac device)
  • Patient having a contraindication for cardiac pacing system implantation (i.e. patient implanted with a defibrillator, patient for whom a single dose of steroid eluted by the pacing lead (e.g., dexamethasone sodium phosphate) is contraindicated, patient implanted with a tricuspid replacement heart valve, with prior tricuspid valve intervention or with a significant tricuspid valve disease that may lead to future replacement heart valve surgery)
  • Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • Minor age patient (i.e. under 18 years of age)
  • Incapacitated patient, under guardianship, kept in detention, refusing to cooperate or not able to understand the purpose of this clinical investigation
  • Non-menopausal women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LINEA cardiac pacing lead
Use of LINEA cardiac pacing lead and delivery catheter for implantation of pacemaker

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LINEA lead complication free rate at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after implantation
Proportion of patients free from complication related to the LINEA lead. A complication is defined as a SADE with a probable or causal relationship to the LINEA lead which triggered an additional invasive intervention or resulted in patient death
3 months after implantation
LINEA lead pacing threshold amplitude at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after implantation
Mean ventricular pacing threshold amplitude
3 months after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of LINEA lead minimum sensed amplitude
Time Frame: 3 months after implantation
Proportion of patients with minimum sensed amplitude ≥ 5 mV
3 months after implantation
General performances of LINEA lead
Time Frame: Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
Pacing threshold amplitude, impedance and minimum sensed amplitude obtained with the LINEA lead at each patient's visit. LBB pacing threshold amplitude obtained with the LINEA lead during implantation, as well as the chronaxie measurement
Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
Safety of the LINEA lead
Time Frame: Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
LINEA lead complication free rate over time, calculated based on number of Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies related to the lead
Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
Safety of the FLEXIGO delivery catheter and the FLEXIGO slitter
Time Frame: Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
FLEXIGO catheter complication free rate, calculated based on number of Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies related to the catheter or the slitter
Implantation, 72 hours from implantation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months and 42 months after implantation
LINEA lead implantation success rates
Time Frame: Implantation
Proportion of LINEA leads implanted in the interventricular septum and meeting or not LBBAP criteria
Implantation
Lead and delivery catheter implantation time
Time Frame: Implantation
Total procedural time and total fluoroscopic time of each implantation
Implantation
LINEA lead and FLEXIGO delivery catheter and slitter implantation usability
Time Frame: Implantation
Handling scores based on a specific questionnaire (scale Very poor/Poor/Acceptable/Good/Very good)
Implantation
Right Ventricular Autothreshold performances
Time Frame: 3 months after implantation
- Accuracy - Comparison between the manual ventricular pacing threshold performed by a physician and the in-clinic ventricular pacing threshold provided by the RVAT function at the same pulse width and during the same on-site patient's visit
3 months after implantation
Evolution of LBBAP capture over time
Time Frame: 18 months after implantation
- LBBAP capture evolution with analyses of ECGs (i.e. V6 R-wave peak time and V6-V1 interpeak interval) and LBBAP criteria collected
18 months after implantation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early outcome - Absence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) related to LINEA lead
Time Frame: 1 month after implantation
Proportion of patients free from USADE. Any event caused by use of the LINEA lead or any accessory packaged with the lead, will be considered as an ADE related to the LINEA lead. The endpoint evaluation will be based on an independent safety events adjudication from a Clinical Events Committee (CEC), based on investigational site reporting
1 month after implantation
Early outcome - LINEA lead pacing threshold amplitude at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month after implantation
Mean ventricular pacing threshold amplitude
1 month after implantation
Early outcome - Other LINEA lead and FLEXIGO delivery catheter safety and performance
Time Frame: 1 month after implantation
- Implantation success rate - Proportion of LINEA lead successfully implanted at the interventricular septum and fulfilling or not LBBAP success criteria according to the operator's decision
1 month after implantation
Early outcome - Other LINEA lead and FLEXIGO delivery catheter safety and performance
Time Frame: 1 month after implantation
- Short term electrical performances variation - Pacing threshold variation between implantation and 1 month, and electrical performances of the LINEA lead (pacing threshold, impedance and minimum sensed amplitude)
1 month after implantation
Early outcome - Other LINEA lead and FLEXIGO delivery catheter safety and performance
Time Frame: 1 month after implantation
- Complication free rate - Proportion of patients free from complication related to the LINEA lead. A complication is defined as a SADE with a probable or causal relationship to the LINEA lead which triggered an additional invasive intervention or resulted in patient death
1 month after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bradycardia

Clinical Trials on Use of LINEA cardiac pacing lead

Subscribe