Ask Questions About Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT)

January 6, 2026 updated by: Lauren Hamel, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Ask Questions About Clinical Trials (ASQ - CT): An Implementation Trial of a Communication Intervention to Improve Patient-Provider Communication About Clinical Trials and Provider Invitations to Clinical Trials

The overall goal of this study is to assess the implementation of the Ask Questions about Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT) brochure, a patient-focused communication tool previously demonstrated to improve patient-provider communication about clinical trials. Participants will be given the ASQ-CT brochure at Time 1 (baseline) and participants will complete a questionnaire at three timepoints, baseline (Time 1), Pre-Research Visit (Time 2), and Post-Research Visit (Time 3).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

293

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or equal to 18 years
  • Appointment to see a provider at a Karmanos Cancer Institute-McLaren or a medical encounter at McLaren Center for Research and Innovation (MCRI) site for medical/systemic treatment
  • Potentially eligible for a clinical trial
  • Speak and read English well enough to be able to understand consent documents and complete surveys

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to complete study documents on their own physically or cognitively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ask Questions about Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT) Brochure
Ask Questions about Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT), a clinical trial communication intervention brochure
Communication intervention called a question prompt list

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness - Self-Efficacy in managing patient-provider interactions - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Improvement of self-efficacy in managing patient-providers interactions between baseline (Time 1) and pre-clinic visit (Time 2). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome
From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach - Number and Proportion
Time Frame: At start of Participation
Proportion of individuals invited to participate who agree to participate. The denominator will be the absolute number of individuals who are identified and approached as potential participants; the numerator will be the number of people who agreed to participate. Investigators will track the number of people who were excluded from participation and why. Investigators anticipate that reach will vary by research site and patient baseline characteristic (i.e., sociodemographic, health literacy level). These variations between clinics will be based only on consented participants. Although the Investigators will track refusals, data will not be collected from patients who decline.
At start of Participation
Effectiveness - Self-Efficacy in managing patient-provider interactions - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Pre-Clinic (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months.
Improvement of self-efficacy in managing patient-providers interactions between baseline (Time 2) and pre-clinic visit (Time 3). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome
From Pre-Clinic (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months.
Effectiveness - Knowledge - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Improvement of knowledge between baseline (Time 1) and pre-clinic visit (Time 2). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome.
From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Effectiveness - Knowledge - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Improvement of knowledge between pre-clinic visit (Time 2) and post-clinic visit (Time 3). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome
From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Effectiveness - Trust - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Improvement in trust in providers between baseline (Time 1) and pre-clinic visit (Time 2). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome
From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Effectiveness - Trust - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Improvement in trust in providers between pre-clinic visit (Time 2) and post-clinic visit (Time 3). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a better outcome
From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Effectiveness - distress - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Improvement in distress between baseline (Time 1) and pre-clinic visit (Time 2). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a worse outcome.
From Baseline (Time 1) to end of Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2)
Effectiveness - distress - Quantitative Scale
Time Frame: From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Improvement in distress between pre-clinic visit (Time 2) and post-clinic visit (Time 3). Measured using scale of 1-5 where a higher score is equal to a worse outcome.
From Pre-Clinic Visit (Time 2) to end of Post-Clinic Visit (Time 3) up to 3 months
Adoption - Number and Proportion
Time Frame: At start of Participation
Adoption is defined by the number, proportion, and representativeness of the clinics willing to implement the Ask Questions about Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT) brochure. The denominator will be the absolute number of clinics who are invited to implement the ASQ-CT brochure; the numerator will be the number of clinics who agree to implement the ASQ-CT brochure.
At start of Participation
Implementation of the Intervention
Time Frame: From Baseline (Time 1) to up to 3 months
Implementation is defined as intervention agents' (e.g., research/clinic staff) fidelity to the adaptations of the intervention and associated implementation strategies. Patients will receive the Ask Questions about Clinical Trials (ASQ-CT) brochure in Time 1. In Time 2, patients will be asked to respond to two fidelity (yes/no) questions, including: 1. When the participant received the ASQ-CT brochure, did the participant receive instructions on how to use it from the clinic/research staff (yes/no)? Was the participant given the chance to discuss the ASQ-CT brochure with clinic/research staff (yes/no?)
From Baseline (Time 1) to up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren M Hamel, PhD, MBA, Wayne State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 5, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-082

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurologic Disorder

Clinical Trials on Ask Questions about Clinical Trials brochure

Subscribe