Feasibility and Acceptability of Peer Intervention for Improving Mental Health Among People Accessing Hormone Care

February 18, 2026 updated by: Daphna Stroumsa, University of Michigan
The purpose of this study is to test whether the peer support program is acceptable, possible, and can improve mental health among individuals accessing hormone care. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomized to the support program or enhanced usual care arm. Participants will take part in this study for 6 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daphna Stroumsa, MD, MPH, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hormone condition aged 18 years or older and English speaking
  • Initiating or receiving hormone care in Michigan
  • Report mild depression or anxiety symptoms, as determined by:

    1. A Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) score ≥ 5 AND/OR
    2. A Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) score ≥ 5.
  • Interest or willingness to participate in peer support group meetings either in-person or virtually

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent for any reason
  • Not fluent in English
  • Determination by patient's attending healthcare provider that peer mentorship is not appropriate due to unstable psychosis, cognitive disorder, or severe personality disorder, or other issue
  • At imminent risk of suicide, as determined by active suicide ideation with intent and/or a specific plan (endorsed Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale number 4 or number 5 in the past month, number 6 in the past 3 months, or spontaneous report)
  • Already receiving or intending to receive formalized individual peer specialist services through another community mental health program or organization
  • Residing outside of the state of Michigan, or planning to move out of the state of Michigan in the next 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer support group
Participants in the peer support group will be contacted by the peer coordinator to be connected with a peer mentor and will have access to peer support options, namely, one-one one meetings with a peer mentor, group meetings with mentors and other participants, and medical appointment buddy.
A peer mentor will be matched to mentees with participant input. The first meeting is intended to establish contact and expectations. Sessions will be scheduled according to the participant's preferences, with a suggested frequency of once a month with more as necessary and feasible. Participants in the peer support group will have access to peer support options that include: one-one one meetings with a peer mentor; group meetings with mentors and other participants; and medical appointment buddy. Participants are not required to use every option each month. Study visits will be completed baseline-6 months.
Other: Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
EUC Documents will be disseminated with hormone care information and resources to share with patients relevant to the participants specific hormone condition or type of hormone care.
Participants randomized to the usual care group will not have access to the peer support options but will complete the study visits (baseline-6 months). All participants will be given a resource document with community resources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility assessed by Acceptability based on the average total Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile (AARP) score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
The 9-item AARP is adapted to specifically address this peer support intervention for individuals seeking hormone care. Participants will respond to a 6-point Likert scale rating participants agreement with each acceptability statement. Total scores range from 9-54 with a higher score indicating greater acceptability.
6 months
Feasibility based on the number of participants that agreed to participate on the study out of total number of individuals approached for study participation.
Time Frame: Up to 6 months (recruitment period)
Up to 6 months (recruitment period)
Feasibility assessed by Practicality based on the total number of one-on-one in-person sessions vs one-on-one virtual sessions
Time Frame: 6 months
This is defined as the total number of one-on-one in-person sessions vs one-on-one virtual sessions.
6 months
Feasibility assessed by Practicality based on the total the number participants engaged with group sessions in-person vs. number of participants engaged virtually
Time Frame: 6 months
This is defined as the total number of participants engaged with group sessions in-person vs. number of participants engaged virtually.
6 months
Safety based on the number of related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months

Related events included will be definitely, probably, and possibly related events (defined per protocol).

The grading scale that will be used for these events include:

  1. - Mild adverse event (AE) - No treatment needed
  2. - Moderate AE - Resolved with treatment
  3. - Severe AE - Inability to carry on normal activities, required professional medical attention
  4. - Life-threatening or disabling AE
  5. - Fatal AE
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daphna Stroumsa, MD, MPH, MSc, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00279649
  • 5K23MD016950-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Peer support group

Subscribe