- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07361250
Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) Targeted Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS) Treats Parkinson's Disease (TIS-STN-PD1)
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS) Targeting the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's Disease: A Single-Center, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor dysfunction.
Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS) is a non-invasive deep brain stimulation technique. Its core principle involves placing two pairs of transcranial stimulation electrodes on the scalp surface, each delivering high-frequency currents with slight differences. Since the human cerebral cortex does not respond to high-frequency currents, when these two currents intersect in the deep brain (i.e., the target area), they generate a low-frequency interference wave-similar to tACS-with a frequency equal to the difference between the two currents. This enables selective modulation of deep brain regions while minimizing activation of the superficial cortex. Additionally, a breakthrough aspect of TIS is its ability to flexibly adjust the stimulation target location by modifying electrode positions and current ratios. This makes it highly suitable for future clinical applications in regulating deep brain nuclei and developing personalized diagnosis and treatment plans for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The technology offers a non-invasive method to alter neuronal activity in deep brain nuclei and has shown promise in improving PD motor symptoms in prior proof-of-concept studies, thereby providing a potential treatment for PD motor symptoms.
In animal models, TIS has been demonstrated to have the potential to modulate the activity of brain regions closely associated with PD motor symptoms, such as the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that TIS stimulation of the unilateral STN in PD patients resulted in alleviation of motor symptoms such as tremor and bradykinesia before and after treatment . A recent exploratory study on TIS stimulation of the right GPi also confirmed that TIS is feasible and safe for alleviating mild PD motor symptoms, particularly bradykinesia and tremor. Compared to the right side, motor symptoms (especially bradykinesia) on the left side showed more significant improvement. PD patients with more severe bradykinesia and tremor before stimulation experienced greater improvement after TIS. Current research findings suggest that TIS has the potential to improve PD motor symptoms. However, in these two studies, some patients did not respond to TIS stimulation. Although preliminary data support the therapeutic potential of TIS for PD motor symptoms, there is still a lack of large-sample, randomized controlled, and systematic studies targeting different brain regions and parameter systems. Therefore, there is an urgent need to conduct standardized clinical trials to evaluate the optimal stimulation parameters, target selection, efficacy persistence, and safety of TIS, providing evidence-based support for its further promotion and application.
This study employs a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIS targeting the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease patients. The study protocol involves structural MRI scanning for all participants to establish individualized computational models, with neuronavigation techniques determining optimal electrode placement. Participants are randomized to either the active stimulation group (using 2000/2130 Hz dual-frequency configuration) or the sham control group (using 2000/2000 Hz configuration). All treatment sessions are conducted during patients' "ON" medication state, administered twice daily for 30 minutes over five consecutive days. Assessment is performed through blinded evaluation by raters unaware of group allocation using standardized scales at predetermined time points. The entire process follows structured data collection and safety monitoring protocols. This study aims to systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety profile of TIS for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease, providing an evidence base for the clinical application of this novel neuromodulation approach.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Zhouping Tang
- Phone Number: +86 13971616328
- Email: ddjtzp@163.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older, no gender restriction;
- Diagnosis of primary Parkinson's disease according to MDS criteria: specifically, the patient must (a) exhibit parkinsonism (bradykinesia + resting tremor/rigidity); (b) not meet any of the MDS absolute exclusion criteria; and (c) meet at least two MDS supportive criteria.
- Disease duration ≥1 year, stable condition;
- Hoehn-Yahr stage between 1.5 and 3, with a stable dose of levodopa or other dopaminergic medications for at least 4 weeks, responsive to levodopa-like medications, and no changes to the treatment regimen during the trial;
- Good compliance, with the patient and family willing to participate in the clinical trial, voluntarily sign the informed consent form, attend regular treatments and follow-ups, and accurately complete evaluation tasks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment, resulting in poor compliance due to dementia, and/or inability to sign the informed consent form;
- History of severe psychiatric disorders, patients with a Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score >24;
- History of taking antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, or other medications that may affect dopamine levels;
- History of seizures within the last year or a family history of epilepsy;
- Unable to complete MRI scanning (e.g., due to claustrophobia, or having metal implants in the body);
- Patients with severe heart, liver, or kidney diseases, severe hypertension, and severe orthostatic hypotension that affect their health condition;
- Patients with severe diabetes or severe cardio-cerebrovascular diseases that affect their health condition;
- Diagnosed with malignant tumors;
- Contraindications for non-invasive electrical stimulation, such as intracranial active implants (regardless of whether they are turned on) or passive implants that may affect electrical stimulation treatment, those who have undergone stereotactic deep brain stimulation or neurotomy, or have had any surgical procedures within the last six months that the investigator believes may affect this trial;
- History of traumatic brain injury;
- Pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant;
- Subjects currently participating in other clinical trials or have participated in other clinical research within the last three months without reaching primary endpoints;
- Patients deemed unsuitable to participate in this clinical study by the investigators.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active TIS stimulation
Participants in this group will receive transcranial temporal interference stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus using a frequency pair of 2000 Hz and 2130 Hz.
Stimulation will be delivered twice daily at the same time for 30 minutes per session over five consecutive days(only once on the 5th day).
Stimulation intensity will be individually titrated starting from a low level and gradually increased to the maximum tolerable level.
All treatments will be administered during the participant's medication "on" state.
|
All participants will receive individualized T1-weighted MRI scans for computational modeling to determine optimized electrode placement and stimulation parameters for transcranial temporal interference stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus.
The stimulation protocol is designed to generate a focal 130 Hz interference field in the target region while minimizing cortical activation.
Parameters including electrode positions and current intensity are customized based on each participant's unique neuroanatomy to ensure precise and tailored neuromodulation.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Participants in this group will receive sham stimulation using a frequency pair of 2000 Hz and 2000 Hz.
Stimulation will be administered twice daily for 30 minutes per session over five consecutive days(only once on the 5th day) during the participant's medication "on" state, with current intensity individually titrated in the same manner as the active group.
The sham protocol includes cutaneous sensation simulation during a 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down phase to maintain participant blinding, but does not generate an effective interference field in the deep brain target.
|
All participants will receive individualized T1-weighted MRI scans for computational modeling to determine optimized electrode placement and stimulation parameters for transcranial temporal interference stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus.
The stimulation protocol is designed to generate a focal 130 Hz interference field in the target region while minimizing cortical activation.
Parameters including electrode positions and current intensity are customized based on each participant's unique neuroanatomy to ensure precise and tailored neuromodulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Score on Part III (Motor Examination) of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 1st(day1), 5th(day3), and 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The motor function of patients was assessed using Part III of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS-III), which has a total score range of 0 to 132.
In this scale, a higher score indicates greater severity of motor symptoms and therefore a worse outcome, with 0 representing no impairment and 132 representing the most severe impairment.
Changes in the score reflect the degree of improvement in motor function.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 1st(day1), 5th(day3), and 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MDS-UPDRS Scale Part I Non-Motor Function Score Changes
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The MDS-UPDRS Scale Part I Non-Motor Function score was used to assess the patient's Cognitive impairment, hallucinations and psychiatric symptoms, depression, apathy, impulse control disorders/dopamine dysregulation syndrome, sleep disorders, pain and other sensory symptoms, and urinary symptoms, with changes in the score reflecting the degree of improvement in those functions.
The score for Part I ranges from 0 to 52 points.
A higher score indicates greater impairment or more severe non-motor symptoms.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
MDS-UPDRS Scale Part II: Activities of Daily Living Score Changes
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The MDS-UPDRS Scale Part II score was used to assess the patient's Activities of Daily Living, with changes in the score reflecting the degree of improvement in daily functions.
The score for Part II ranges from 0 to 52 points.
A higher score indicates greater impairment in daily activities.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
MDS-UPDRS Scale Part IV: Motor Fluctuations, Dyskinesias, and Dystonia Score Changes
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The MDS-UPDRS Scale Part IV score was used to assess the patient's Motor Fluctuations, Dyskinesias, and Dystonia.
The score for Part IV ranges from 0 to 24 points.
A higher score indicates more severe motor complications caused by long-term levodopa therapy.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Change in Score on the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is used to assess the disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.
The summary index score ranges from 0 to 100 points.
A higher score indicates a poorer quality of life.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Change in Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
Change in Score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is used to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms.
This assessment consists of 17 items with a total score range from 0 to 54 points; a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
With common clinical thresholds (e.g., 0-7 = Normal, 8-16 = Mild Depression, 17-23 = Moderate Depression, ≥24 = Severe Depression).
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Change in Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) is a 14-item scale to evaluate the severity of anxiety symptoms, where each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 4. The HAMA total score ranges from 0 to 56, with lower scores indicating fewer anxiety symptoms.
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Change in Score on the Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue (VAS-Fatigue)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is used to quantify the subjective intensity of fatigue.
The score typically ranges from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 represents "no fatigue" and 10 represents "the worst imaginable fatigue.
A higher score indicates greater fatigue severity
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Change in Score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is used to assess sleep quality and disturbances over the past month.
With changes in the score reflecting the multiple factors of daily function.
Each component is scored from 0 to 3. The global PSQI score is the sum of the 7 component scores, ranging from 0 to 21 points.
A higher total score indicates poorer sleep quality
|
Baseline (before treatment), immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min), and at the two-week and four-week follow-ups after the completion of treatment.
|
|
Changes in Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment) and immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min).
|
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a non-invasive, functional neuroimaging technique that measures the magnetic fields generated by the electrical activity of neurons in the brain.
It provides direct, real-time (millisecond resolution) information about brain function.
With changes in MEG reflecting the brain functional connectivity before and after treatment
|
Baseline (before treatment) and immediately after the 9th(day5) stimulation sessions (each session lasts for 30 min).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The incidence of SAE
Time Frame: From the first stimulation session until the end of the study follow-up period (each stimulation session lasts for 30 minutes; total study duration including follow-up is 5 weeks). SAEs will be monitored and recorded continuously throughout this period.
|
The incidence of SAE
|
From the first stimulation session until the end of the study follow-up period (each stimulation session lasts for 30 minutes; total study duration including follow-up is 5 weeks). SAEs will be monitored and recorded continuously throughout this period.
|
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1month after randomization
|
1month after randomization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zhouping Tang, PhD MD, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 450001
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Violante IR, Alania K, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Acerbo E, Carron R, Williamson A, Kurtin DL, Rhodes E, Hampshire A, Kuster N, Boyden ES, Pascual-Leone A, Grossman N. Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):1994-2004. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01456-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
- Grossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, Kodandaramaiah SB, Rudenko A, Suk HJ, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Tsai LH, Pascual-Leone A, Boyden ES. Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields. Cell. 2017 Jun 1;169(6):1029-1041.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.024.
- Yang C, Xu Y, Du Y, Shen X, Li T, Chen N, Zhu Y, Li L, Huang L, Lu J, Qian Z, Wang Z, Zhou J, Ziemann U, Zhang C, Liu Y. Transcranial temporal interference subthalamic stimulation for treating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2024 Nov-Dec;17(6):1250-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Oct 30. No abstract available.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202511129
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
CND Life SciencesDigestive Disease Associates of CTRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Neuron23 Inc.Roche Diagnostic Ltd.; Qiagen Manchester LimitedRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | Early Parkinson Disease (Early PD)United States, Spain, Israel, Poland, Italy, United Kingdom
-
San Francisco Neurology and Sleep CenterNot yet recruitingPARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalUniversity of Bergen; SPARK NSRecruitingParkinson Disease (PD) | Parkinson s DiseaseNorway
-
CND Life SciencesOregon Health and Science UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)United States
-
Università degli Studi dell'InsubriaUniversidade Nova de Lisboa; Associazione Parkinson Insubria (AsPI), Section... and other collaboratorsRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)Italy
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedParkinson Disease 6, Early-Onset | Parkinson Disease (Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset) 7, Human | Parkinson Disease Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset | Parkinson Disease, Autosomal Recessive Early-Onset, Digenic, Pink1/Dj1United States
-
Duke UniversityMedical University of South Carolina; Massachusetts General Hospital; Mayo Clinic and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingGut Microbiota | Gut Microbiome | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Prodromal Parkinsons DiseaseUnited States
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnParkinson Disease | Parkinsons Disease With Dementia | Parkinson-Dementia Syndrome | Parkinson Disease 2 | Parkinson Disease 3 | Parkinson Disease 4United States
Clinical Trials on NervioX-1000
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterRecruitingObsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)China
-
Ruijin HospitalEnrolling by invitation
-
Ruijin HospitalEnrolling by invitation
-
Vyaire MedicalCompletedVentilation Therapy; Complications
-
University of California, IrvineCompletedCerebral IschemiaUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownErectile DysfunctionIsrael
-
NeuroEM Therapeutics, Inc.University of South Florida Health / Byrd Alzheimer's InstituteCompletedAlzheimer Disease | Alzheimer Disease, Late OnsetUnited States
-
HeadSense MedicalRigshospitalet, DenmarkUnknownIntracranial HypertensionDenmark, Germany, Netherlands
-
HeadSense MedicalState Medical Center, Republic of ArmeniaCompleted
-
Pharmacosmos A/SCompleted