A Randomized Controlled Trial to Address a Multimodal Intervention in the Elderly (CAMINN)

January 14, 2026 updated by: Guillermo Palacios, Universidad de Zaragoza

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Address a Multimodal Intervention in the Elderly: the Efficacy of the CAMINN Study

The study is a quantitative randomized control trial (RCT) with a longitudinal pre-test, mid-test and post-test within and between subject design. It was conducted between July 2023 and December 2024. This study has been developed under a multicenter basis, since the intervention has involved institutionalized participants in two different nursing homes/care facilities as well as participants in community-dwelling settings. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups (experimental and control). Randomization was performed by means of a computer-generated random number schedule. The trial began with 187 participants. The objective of the intervention was to determine if after the application of a multimodal intervention for 18 months, the subjects would obtain significant improvements in the scores of different clinically validated tests

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

187

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Teruel
      • Teruel, Teruel, Spain, 44003
        • University of Zaragoza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be over 60 years of age or over 55 years of age with a diagnosed pathology and preferably with a recognized physical and/or cognitive dependency; have the cognitive capacity to maintain fluid conversations and repeat movements through a video call with a professional; be able to acquire the ability to connect autonomously to sessions or have a reference person in charge of the connections; the person must have a television with an HDMI input port.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe cognitive impairment, situations of great physical dependence that lack help, or psychotropic substance abuse or dependence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Control group
Experimental: Experimental group
Experimental group receives treatment
To measure the effectiveness of the intervention, eight variables were assessed: cognitive impairment, quality of life, depression, perceived loneliness, functional capacity to perform basic activities and tasks of daily living (ADL), ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) and balance and gait. The following inventories were used as instruments to measure the aforementioned variables at baseline, mid intervention and after intervention: MMSE scale, FUMAT scale, the abbreviated version of the Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale, the revised ESTE scale, the Barthel's scale, the Lawton and Brody's test and the Tineti's scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life
Time Frame: up to 18 months

The FUMAT scale (Gómez et al., 2008) was used to assess quality of life by means of 8 different dimensions. The higher the score across its eight dimensions, the greater the individual's perceived and objective quality of life. It assesses areas such as emotional well-being, relationships, material well-being, personal well-being, physical well-being, self-determination, inclusion, and rights.

Gómez, L. E., M. A., V., Arias, B., & Navas, P. (2008). Evaluación de la calidad de vida en personas mayores y con discapacidad: La Escala Fumat. Intervención Psicosocial, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.4321/S1132-05592008000200007

up to 18 months
Cognitive impairment
Time Frame: up to 18 months

Cognitive impairment was assessed via the Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE) (Folstein et al., 1975). The MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) is a 5-10 minute screening test that assesses cognitive status (orientation, memory, attention, language) through 30 simple questions and tasks. It is scored out of 30, where 24 points suggest cognitive impairment. A higher score indicates better cognitive function.

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state." Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

up to 18 months
depression
Time Frame: up to 18 months

The abbreviated version of the Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale (Martínez de la Iglesia et al., 2002) was used to assess depression.

The 15-item Abbreviated Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), validated in Spanish by Martínez de la Iglesia et al. (2002), is a reliable, Yes/No questionnaire used to screen for depression in adults over 65. It offers similar diagnostic accuracy to the original 30-item version, typically using a cutoff score >= 5 to indicate depression

up to 18 months
perceived loneliness
Time Frame: up to 18 months

Loneliness was assessed using the revised ESTE scale (ESTE-R) (Rubio & Aleixandre, 1999). The ESTE scale is a psychometric tool designed to measure unwanted loneliness in older adults, assessing three key factors: social support, use of new technologies, and social participation. It uses a questionnaire that scores from 0 to 30, determining low, medium, or high levels of loneliness. The higher the total score, the greater the level of loneliness reported by the individual.

Rubio, R., & Aleixandre, M. (1999). La escala "Este", un indicador objetivo de soledad en la tercera edad. Geriatrika. Revista Iberoamericana de Geriatría y Gerontología, 15, 26-35.

up to 18 months
Activities of daily living (ADL)
Time Frame: up to 18 months

The Barthel's scale (F.I. Mahoney & Barthel, 1965) was used to measure the subjects' functional capacity to perform basic activities and tasks of daily living (ADL).The Barthel's scale is a functional assessment tool that measures a person's independence in 10 basic activities of daily living (ADLs) using a score from 0 to 100. It is based on observation or questioning about the ability to eat, bathe, dress, control bowel and bladder control, transfer, and ambulate. A higher score on the scale indicates a greater level of independence.

F.I. Mahoney, & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J., 14, 61-65.

up to 18 months
Instrumental activities of daily living (iADL)
Time Frame: up to 18 months

Lawton and Brody's test (Lawton & Brody, 1970) was used to measure the ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The Lawton and Brody Scale is a geriatric tool that measures the independence of older adults in performing Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). It assesses eight key areas, such as using the telephone, shopping, preparing food, household chores, laundry, transportation, medication management, and finances. Scores are assigned from 0 (dependent) to 1 (independent) per item, for a total of 0 to 8, indicating the degree of autonomy and allowing for early detection of functional decline. Higher scores on the scale indicate greater independence.

Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1970). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Nursing Research, 13(3), 278.

up to 18 months
Tinetti scale
Time Frame: up to 18 months

Tineti's scale (Tinetti, 1986) was used to assess the balance and gait of older adults and determine the risk of falls. The Tinetti scale is a geriatric assessment tool that measures the risk of falls in older adults by analyzing their balance and gait through direct observation. It scores everyday tasks (sitting, standing, turning, walking) on a scale of 0 to 28, where less than 19 points indicates high risk and more than 25 indicates low risk.

Tinetti, M. E. (1986). Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc., 34, 119-126.

up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Protocol 3243/2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on People 60 Years of Age or Over 55 Years of Age With a Diagnosed Pathology and Preferably With a Recognized Physical and/or Cognitive Dependency

Clinical Trials on Multimodal intervention in the elderly

Subscribe