Evaluation of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected Urine and Vaginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding

May 12, 2026 updated by: University of Aarhus

The ENDOMETRIAL Study: EvaluatioN of DNA methylatiOn Markers for EndomeTrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected urIne and vAginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal bLeeding

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the clinical utility of DNA-methylation testing in urine and vaginal samples collected by patients and cervical samples collected by clinicians, to determine the risk of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women with postmenopausal bleeding. The study aims to answer the following research questions:

  • What is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in urine, vaginal and cervical samples compared to traditional TVUS for endometrial cancer detection?
  • What is the 2-year risk of EC among women testing negative on TVUS and/or DNA methylation tests or those testing positive on methylation only?

Researchers will compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples as well as in clinician-collected cervical samples, with the traditional diagnostic pathway for women with PMB, which includes TVUS evaluation, and when indicated by abnormal TVUS findings, endometrial biopsy according to clinical guidelines.

Participants will

  • take a urine and vaginal sample
  • have a cervical sample collected by a clinician
  • undergo TVUS evaluation according to clinical guidelines
  • If TVUS shows thickened endometrium (≥ 5 mm) and/or irregularity, an endometrial biopsy will be collected according to clinical guidelines
  • fill out a questionnaire regarding acceptability and preferences of sampling methods and complete a lifestyle questionnaire.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence is rising and is the fourth most common cancer type in women worldwide with about 417,000 new cases and 90,000 deaths annually. Moreover, EC is the most common gynaecological cancer in developed countries including Denmark with about 800 new cases and 90 deaths yearly. Early diagnosis is essential since the prognosis for women with an advanced-stage EC is poor. No screening exists for EC and the most commonly observed clinical symptom is post-menopausal bleeding (PMB), which is a common condition affecting about 11% of postmenopausal women. Because 90% of EC cases, are preceded by PMB, referral for specialized gynaecological care through cancer patient pathways is indicated for all Danish women with PMB, causing anxiety among women and high healthcare costs. However, only 5-10% of women presenting with PMB have EC. Worldwide, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) evaluation of the endometrium (cut-off: thickness ≥5mm and/or irregular lining of the uterine cavity) is used to identify women with PMB who have the highest cancer risk and therefore require an endometrial biopsy with or without hysteroscopy. While TVUS evaluation is highly sensitive (94.8%) it suffers from low specificity (51%) causing high numbers of unnecessary invasive procedures in healthy women. Moreover, the diagnostic program depends on skilled specialists for ultrasound evaluation, endometrial sampling as well as histopathological examination. This reinforces the clinical urgent and unmet need for a simpler, non-invasive, user-provided and more specific test to aid EC diagnosis.

This study aims to determine whether DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples is a clinically safe non-invasive alternative to determine EC risk. Testing for elevated DNA hypermethylation levels of cancer-specific genes has been demonstrated to provide a promising biomarker for detection of early-stage cancers, including cervical and endometrial cancer. DNA hypermethylation has been linked to silencing of tumour suppressor genes, thereby contributing to cancer development. Biologically, the ability to use vaginal and urine material for EC detection by DNA methylation testing is explained by local shedding of EC-derived DNA and cell fragments into the vaginal debris and urine as well as transrenal excretion of tumour-shed circulating DNA into the urine.

Mainly small proof-of-concept and case-control studies have shown feasibility for detecting EC using DNA methylation testing in plasma, self-collected vaginal samples, and clinician-collected cervical scrapes. However, the first paper reporting on the diagnostic value of DNA methylation analysis in vaginal samples and urine as a liquid biopsy for EC was just published by co-supervisor Prof. Steenbergen last year. Here, case-control data revealed excellent diagnostic performance of EC-specific DNA methylation markers in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples with sensitivities of 89-90% and specificities of 90-92% for EC detection using marker panels including: CDH13, GHSR, SST, CDO1, and ZIC1.

Only one prospective cohort study has compared the diagnostic performance of DNA methylation testing in clinician-collected cervicovaginal samples with the conventional TVUS evaluation in terms of detecting the presence or absence of EC in women aged 45+ with abnormal uterine bleeding. The results demonstrated the WID-qEC DNA methylation test (markers: ZSCAN12 and GYPC) to have equal sensitivity (90.9%) and superior specificity (92.1 vs 79.1%) as compared with TVUS evaluation.

However, this will be the first study to compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples with TVUS evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study, comparing diagnostic test methods at the time of diagnosis as well as the long-term safety after two years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The vaginal, urine and cervical samples will be stored in a biobank at the Dept. of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital (RHR) until shipment for DNA methylation testing analysis using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) in Prof. Steenbergen's laboratory at Amsterdam University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. All samples will be tested for methylation markers, three for vaginal samples (CDO1, GHSR, ZIC1), three for urine (GHSR, CDH13, SST) and three for cervical samples (CDH13 + CDO1 + ZIC1). Results on TVUS evaluation and endometrial biopsies will be retrieved from the nationwide Danish Pathology Databank and the electronic patient journal linked to the patient through the Civil Registration System in Denmark, where all residents have a unique 10-digit code (CPR number), to which all health data is linked.

AIMs:

1) To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in patient-collected full-void urine and vaginal samples, as well as clinician-collected cervical samples to detect EC among women with postmenopausal bleeding, and 2) to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of DNA methylation with the current diagnostic evaluation with TVUS.

HYPOTHESES:

  1. DNA methylation testing in urine samples can detect EC with comparable sensitivity and superior specificity compared with TVUS and with higher accuracy than DNA methylation testing in vaginal and cervical samples.
  2. DNA methylation analysis in urine samples will have a long-term negative EC risk after 2 years equivalent to TVUS, but better than vaginal and cervical samples.

RESEARCH PLAN AND FEASIBILITY The study will be conducted in collaboration between University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Department of Pathology, RHR and with gynaecological departments in Central Denmark (Randers and Aarhus) and Southern Denmark Region (Odense) working as inclusion sites. State-of-the-art laboratory facilities are in place at Prof. Steenbergen's laboratory at Amsterdam UMC, supporting the feasibility of the study.

PERSPECTIVES AND COMMUNICATION If successful, the research will have international impact and result in a novel diagnostic tool that will differentiate between women with PMB who do or do not need specialist referral through cancer patients' pathways to have invasive endometrial biopsies. This will facilitate timely diagnosis, lower the anxiety among patients, and reduce the pressure on the healthcare system. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and will be concluded with a PhD dissertation. The results will be distributed to relevant clinical fora and implemented in national as well as international guidelines.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Mette Tranberg, PhD
  • Phone Number: +4578420264
  • Email: mettrani@rm.dk

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Karen O. Binderup
  • Phone Number: +4524656562
  • Email: kabind@rm.dk

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Randers, Denmark, 8930
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Randers Regional Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Isa Niemann, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +4521141753
          • Email: isaniema@rm.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with postmenopausal bleeding undergoing diagnostic evaluation for endometrial cancer will be recruited from Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, and Odense University Hospital, Southern Denmark Region, Denmark.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal bleeding (defined as vaginal bleeding after absence of periods for ≥ 12 months) undergoing diagnostic evaluation for EC at gynaecological departments
  • Treated in Central Denmark Region or Southern Denmark Region, Denmark
  • Able to provide written consent for participation
  • Able to read and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other concurrent cancer diagnosis besides diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding
  • Withdrawal of consent
  • Hysterectomized

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Women with postmenopausal bleeding
Women referred for diagnostic evaluation to gynaecological departments for endometrial cancer due to postmenopausal bleeding
DNA-methylation testing of methylation markers CDO1, GHSR and ZIC1 for patient-collected vaginal samples, GHSR, CDH13 and SST for patient-collected urine samples and CDH13 + CDO1 + ZIC1 for clinician-collected cervical samples.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: At the time of enrollment and to the time of diagnosis
The performance of each methylation marker panels in urine, vaginal and cervical samples and the TVUS will be evaluated by area Under the Curve with 95% CIs.
At the time of enrollment and to the time of diagnosis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mette Tranberg, PhD, University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 24, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 24, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Bleeding

Clinical Trials on DNA-methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples and clinician-collected cervical samples

Subscribe