Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy

September 27, 2021 updated by: hany farouk, Aswan University Hospital

Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare the effectiveness of vaginal dinoprostone and vaginal Isonicotinic acid hydrazide in minimizing the pain experienced by postmenopausal patients during diagnostic office hysteroscopy and to assess the ease of insertion of hysteroscope as reported by the hysteroscopist.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

hysteroscopy is commonly used in the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine lesions such as polyps, fibroids, septa, and adhesions, and in the presence of abnormal bleeding and during the removal of an intrauterine device or foreign body. Cervical ripening is made possible by the use of medication through different routes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • Recruiting
        • Aswan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Menopausal patients with an indication for office hysteroscopy (postmenopausal bleeding or abnormal ultrasound findings)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nulliparous patients
  • patients with cervical pathology
  • retroverted uterus (detected by transvaginal ultrasound)
  • previous cervical surgery
  • patients with severe vaginal bleeding
  • allergy or contraindications to dinoprostone or INH therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: INH
3 tablet of INH 900 mg inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy.
3 tablet of INH inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy
Other Names:
  • Isonicotinic acid hydrazide
Active Comparator: dinoprostone
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy.
1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy.
Other Names:
  • prostin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of pain
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Pain intensity will be assessed by visual analogue scale during the procedure. Visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: 15 minutes
From the introduction of hysteroscope into the vagina till compilation of hysteroscopic examination
15 minutes
Pain intensity will be assessed by visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes after the procedure
Pain intensity will be assessed by visual analogue scale 30 minutes after the procedure. Visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10
30 minutes after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Bleeding

Clinical Trials on INH

Subscribe