Medico-economic Impact of Screening Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis in Molecular Biology by "Point-of-care" During Pregnancy (AuTop)

Infection is the principal cause of preterm births. Most (90%) women with preterm deliveries have no abnormal history. It is widely agreed that preterm delivery is often associated with bacterial vaginosis. One of the major difficulties at this time is that the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is based on heterogeneous criteria. The technique currently used is the Nugent score, but it lacks the characteristics necessary for widespread use in the general population. It must be performed on a fresh swab, and any delay in transporting it can cause drying that makes the test difficult to perform.

The investigators have developed a rapid diagnostic tool for bacterial vaginosis using molecular biology based on a point of care model and obtained a patent (European Patent Office N° 2087134). In comparison with the reference techniques, our tool's performance has been excellent, in terms of specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values. In particular, our work showed that 57% of the flora samples rated as intermediate on the Nugent score were in reality true bacterial vaginosis. Molecular biology therefore identifies a homogeneous population of women with vaginal flora anomalies. The investigators recently showed that the carriage of Atopobium vaginae and/or Gardnerella vaginalis >105/mL shortens the time to delivery in a population at risk of preterm delivery (PHRC 2006). Vaginal flora anomalies are therefore an important target for preventing preterm delivery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The principal objective is to use a cost-effectiveness study to assess the medical and economic impact of a new strategy for the screening and subsequent treatment of vaginal flora anomalies before the 20th week of gestation- molecular biology techniques (PCR for A. vaginae and G. vaginalis by point-of-care testing) will test self-collected vaginal samples in a population of pregnant women at low risk of preterm delivery. There are multiple secondary objectives, including assessment of the effect of the strategy on the following indicators- delivery before 26, 32, and 37 weeks. Methods-An open-label prospective randomized study will compare 2 groups with different management of their pregnancies. Pregnant women at low risk, regardless of any symptoms, will be randomized into 2 groups. The study will not include women at high risk of preterm delivery. Innovative strategy (group A)- these women will undergo routine screening for bacterial vaginosis by analysis of their self-collected vaginal samples with this innovative technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6800

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
      • Marseille, France, 13915
        • Hôpital Nord Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 18 years with a pregnancy before 20 weeks are some parity and gravidity;
  • Woman who understood the process and the objectives of the study and who agreed to sign an informed consent;
  • Without a history of premature birth or late abortion (population at low risk of preterm birth);
  • Having no major risk factors for prematurity: insulin-dependent diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypertension, uterine malformation, cone biopsy, multiple pregnancy;
  • No pre-existing hypertension;
  • Asymptomatic or symptomatic regarding the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Woman withdrawing her consent during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Innovative strategy (group A):
these women will undergo routine screening for bacterial vaginosis by analysis of their self-collected vaginal samples with this innovative technique; if the test is found to be positive, an appropriate treatment will be prescribed. The POC (point-of-care) test will be considered positive if: A. vaginae is detected at a threshold > 105.copies per ml and/or G. vaginalis > 105 copies per ml. The women with vaginosis will be screened monthly for recurrences through 28 weeks, and recurrence will be treated.
Other Names:
  • azithromycine
Other: Standard strategy (group B):
This group will be followed according to the usual practices of the physicians seeing them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the incremental cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 30 months

the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between the two groups corresponding to the cost of preterm birth before 37 avoided.

  • average differential effect in terms of preterm birth before 37 weeks of 0.013. A preterm birth rate of 0.043 (+/- 0.043) is expected in the group B and 0.03 (+/- 0.03) in Group A;
  • Cost differential means € 230 +/- 35. This difference takes into account the estimated EFC (initial and recurrent) cost and estimated cost of treatments vaginosis cases (10% of patients);
  • Cost-effectiveness threshold of 22,500 euros corresponding to the average cost ratio that is could avoid caring for a child born prematurely before 37 weeks as documented in the international literature (Petrou 2012);
30 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the delivery rate before 26, 28, 32 and 37 weeks
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months
the rate of rupture of membranes
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months
the rate of intrauterine growth retardation
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months
the rate of endometritis
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months
the preterm birth rate adjusted
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months
he total duration of hospitalization and earlier for postpartum mother and newborn in number of days
Time Frame: 30 months
30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-001559-22
  • RCAPHM14_0085 (Other Identifier: AP HM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Risk of Preterm Delivery

Clinical Trials on -self-collected vaginal samples

Subscribe