Multicomponent Breathlessness and Physical Activity Intervention in People With Asthma Using a Digital Platform (BRAID)

February 16, 2026 updated by: University of Newcastle, Australia

Multicomponent Breathlessness and Physical Activity Intervention in People With Moderate to Severe Asthma Using a Supported Digital Platform

Treating breathlessness could help people with asthma have fewer symptoms and be more physically active. People with asthma report that it is important to deal with breathlessness during physical activity programs, but past research hasn't focused on this need.

The investigators have developed a multicomponent digitally supported intervention targeting breathlessness and physical inactivity. This study will test whether the multicomponent digital supported intervention will help people with asthma. The main question the study aims to answer is:

Does the multicomponent digitally supported intervention improve quality of life?

Participants will:

  • Be allocated to the intervention or usual care. Allocation to either group will be random (like tossing a coin).
  • Attend study visits to complete an assessment involving questionnaires and measurements
  • Receive telephone calls to ask questions about health
  • Be invited to take part in an interview to have a conversation about thoughts on participating in the study
  • Be asked to provide consent to collect information from Services Australia regarding use of health care services and medications

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
    • Queensland
      • Chermside, Queensland, Australia, 4032

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Evidence of variable airflow limitation within the past 10-years to confirm asthma diagnosis
  • Meets diagnostic criteria for moderate, or severe asthma
  • Reports breathlessness impacting daily life physical activities (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] dyspnoea score ≥1) within the past 1-week
  • Owns a smart device with internet access, which they are willing and able to use for the study duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High dependence on medical care
  • Significant life-limiting comorbidity (<12 months life expectancy)
  • Cognitive impairment, poor English language skills or significant untreated hearing impairment that prevents completion of data collection forms or understanding of verbal instructions
  • Current participation in any other clinical trial, or participation in another clinical trial within the 4-weeks preceding study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital self-management platform and enhanced usual care
Attend an in-person session with an respiratory nurse, focused on breathlessness and physical activity self-management; and be provided access to a digital self-management platform
Enhanced usual asthma tertiary care
Other: Enhanced usual care
Enhanced usual asthma tertiary care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time Frame: 6-months
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A mean score across all items equally weighted is reported. The minimal clinically important difference has been estimated to be 0.5 units.
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
It asks 5 questions about asthma symptoms over the past week. Each question has a score from 0 to 6. The final score is the mean result of the 5 questions. A high ACQ-5 score indicates poorly controlled asthma. A change in ACQ-5 score of 0.5 or more is considered clinically significant.
6-months & 12-months
Shortness of Breathlessness with Daily Activities (SOBDA)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-month
The SOBDA is designed to be completed in the evening, recalling that day. Participants are invited to rate how breathlessness they were while performing 13 different daily activities. An average daily score is reported from 4-7 days, with greater scores indicating more severe shortness of breathlessness with daily activities. The minimal clinically important difference estimated to be 0.1-0.2.
6-months & 12-month
Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-month
The MDP comprises 11 items each rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, of which five pertain to physical sensory qualities and five emotional responses. The rating of sensory qualities is summed, along with a 0-10 rating of overall unpleasantness (A1), for an Immediate Perception (IP) sub-score. The five emotional response items are summed for an Emotional Response (ER) sub-score. The minimal clinically important difference has been estimated to be 1 for the A1 item, 3 for the Immediate Perception sub-score and 2 for the Emotional Response sub-score. Higher scores on any of the scales indicate greater intensity, unpleasantness, or emotional distress related to breathlessness.
6-months & 12-month
Dyspnoea-12 (D-12)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) has 12 breathlessness descriptors pertaining to the different qualitative dimensions of breathlessness, rated on a 0-4 Likert scale, where 0 = "none", 1= "mild", 2= "moderate" and 3= "severe". All items of the D-12 can be summed for a total score (0-36). A higher score signifies more severe breathlessness. The minimal clinically important difference has been estimated to be 3 units.
6-months & 12-months
Physical activity
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
Participants will be provided an accelerometer to wear for 10 continuous days, 24-hrs per day. The accelerometer will capture data on physical activity levels (intensity, frequency, and duration). Average time per day/week spent in light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity will be evaluated and recorded.
6-months & 12-months
Theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) questionnaire
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) is a generic questionnaire that assesses intervention acceptability from recipients' perspectives across seven constructs. Items are rated on a 0-5 likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and fewer barriers to use.
6-months & 12-months
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level ( EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 12-months
The EQ-5D-5L consists of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on a 5-level scale (1 = no problems to 5 = extreme problems), and a 0-100 visual analogue scale (0 = the worst health to 100 = the best health) for self-rated health. This self-report questionnaire will be used to generate health utility weights and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis.
12-months
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
The AIM is part of a systematically developed valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of three key implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility). AIM specifically measures the acceptability of the intervention which consists of four items rated on a 5-point likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the intervention.
6-months & 12-months
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
The IAM is part of a systematically developed valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of three key implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility). IAM specifically measures the appropriateness of the intervention which consists of four items rated on a 5-point likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness of the intervention.
6-months & 12-months
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: 6-months & 12-months
The FIM is part of a systematically developed valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of three key implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility). FIM specifically measures the feasibility of the intervention which consists of four items rated on a 5-point likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility of the intervention.
6-months & 12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data may be shared through mediated access, managed by the designated data custodian, subject to (1) Explicit participant consent for data sharing and re-use obtained during the consent process, (2) appropriate data sharing agreements with requesting parties, and (3) review of the proposed re-use to ensure alignment with the original consent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breathlessness

Clinical Trials on Multicomponent digital self-management platform

Subscribe