Comparison of Liver Biopsy Versus Fibroscan With CAP ( Controlled Attenuation Parameter) in Donors Evaluation for Liver Transplant (DonorFibroScan)

March 4, 2026 updated by: Amira Mohammed Abdel Mowgod, Assiut University

Comparison of Liver Biopsy Versus Fibroscan With CAP (Controlled Attenuation Parameter) in Donors Evaluation for Liver Transplant

In our study we aiming that liver biopsy histological analysis as a reference standard, to examine the precision of fbroscan controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for quantitative evaluation of macrovesicular steatosis in living related liver donors.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

To reduce waitlist mortality in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) there are ongoing efforts to expand the living liver donor pool. Simultaneously, the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the general population has increased from 15% to 25% since 2005, which has significant implications on the pool of potential living liver donors.

Hepatic steatosis is one of the most frequent chronic parenchymatous liver changes in healthy people, and it can prevent a healthy donor from transplantation, because fatty changes that affect the graft's longevity can also affect the donor's own liver function.

The liver biopsy is the most crucial procedure for the identification and measurement of hepatic steatosis. Nevertheless, this approach is still invasive and exposes users to the danger of bleeding and infection, and is frequently only performed on carefully chosen donors and is not appropriate for screening or tracking.

The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) using fbroscan M or XL probe has been created for hepatic steatosis evaluation. In individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), moderate steatosis has been shown to respond favourably to CAP.

Due to the limitations of biopsy, many noninvasive methods, particularly radiological methods for the assessment of steatosis, have emerged. These methods include CAP, US assessment, CT, magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI), and liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) based on US signal.

Numerous benefits of the CAP determined by TE, such as its noninvasive, non ionizing, quantitative, quick, and repeatable characteristics, indicate that this parameter may be an effective method for identifying prospective living liver transplants.The CAP determined by TE has been used in numerous but small investigations to assess hepatic steatosis in living liver donations.

The efectiveness of CAP for identifying steatosis in 55 living liver donation prospects was assessed. They discovered that using US-guided liver biopsy as the reference standard, the AUROC ( Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) of CAP for detecting complete steatosis (>33%) was 0.88 with a cutoff value of 276 dB/m. Fifty-four living donors were evaluated using the CAP in a different research , and the outcomes were compared with those from intra-operative biopsy. With a cutoff value of 257 dB/m in that research, the CAP had an AUROC of 0.96 for identifying complete steatosis (>5%).

In a different study in 204 living donors were evaluated using CAP measurement and compared to the histological results for biopsy with only Mas being taken into account and MiS being excluded from the study. It was found that CAP had an AUROC of 0.938 for MaS 10% with a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specifcity of 92.4%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Amira M. Abdelmawgod, Lecturer, Tropical Medicine
  • Phone Number: +201012760437
  • Email: amiramohmad60@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • After obtaining the appropriate consents, data pertaining to clinical history (name, age, sex, residence, occupation, co-morbidities… diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, special habits; such as alcohol intake).
  • blood samples will be collected for CBC. ( Hb level , WBCs, Platelets), liver function tests (albumin, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin), lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL), CRP, serum uric acid, HbA1c, and Kidney function test(serum urea and creatinine).
  • Six measurements will be obtained (sex, age, height, weight, body mass index, and waist circumference).

Overweight is defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m² and obesity is defined as: BMI ≥30 kg/m².

  • Imaging for evaluation of donors with BMI ≥25 kg/m² such as abdominal US and FibroScan with CAP.
  • Donors with BMI ≥25 kg/m² will receive life style modification and medical treatment for improvement of steatosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All donors aged >18 years old
  • eligible for Liver Transplant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • -Subjects aged ≤18 years old.
  • Donors refused to do FibroScan with CAP

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) for Quantitative Assessment of Macrovesicular Steatosis in Living Liver Donors: A Comparative Study with Liver Biopsy
Time Frame: 24 month
This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) for the quantitative assessment of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living related liver donors, using liver biopsy histopathological analysis as the reference standard
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 04-2026-300794

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe